Creator Forum - Racial Loyalty News Online

Racial Loyalty News => General News => Downunder News => Topic started by: Rev.Cambeul on Fri 22 Nov 2013

Title: Jewish Supremacists Lead Minorities Blocking Repeal of Hate Laws
Post by: Rev.Cambeul on Fri 22 Nov 2013
Google Search: Racial Discrimination Act 18C Changes ...
https://www.google.com.au/search?q=Racial+Discrimination+Act+18C+changes




Australian Jews Brace for Fight Against Repeal of Hate Laws
Haaretz (Israel)
http://www.i24news.tv/en/news/international/asia-pacific/131117-australian-jews-brace-for-fight-against-repeal-of-hate-laws (http://www.i24news.tv/en/news/international/asia-pacific/131117-australian-jews-brace-for-fight-against-repeal-of-hate-laws)
Jewish leaders in Australia are bracing for a potential showdown with the new Liberal government over its pre-election pledge to repeal sections of the nation's race hate laws, which make Holocaust denial and the promotion of anti-Semitism unlawful. Tony Abbott's government, which entered federal parliament for its first sitting Tuesday following its landslide victory in September, is preparing to scrap sections of the Racial Discrimination Act that have been successfully used by the Executive Council of Australian Jewry to litigate against Holocaust deniers, anti-Semites, far-right groups and religious extremists.

In Australia, Jewish Leaders Warn Against Lifting Restrictions on Free Speech
The Guardian (Britain)
http://www.theguardian.com/law/2013/nov/08/jewish-leaders-warn-against-changing-racial-discrimination-act (http://www.theguardian.com/law/2013/nov/08/jewish-leaders-warn-against-changing-racial-discrimination-act)
Jewish community leaders have warned that an immediate amendment to sections of the Racial Discrimination Act in response to the 2011 conviction of the columnist Andrew Bolt could "give succour to racists". The executive director of the Australia/ Israel Jewish Affairs Council, Dr Colin Rubenstein, conceded that the government had made clear before the election its concerns that aspects of the law infringed freedom of speech, but said he had understood there would first be consultations and a full review of the act's effectiveness.
Title: Re: Jewish Supremacists Lead Minorities Blocking Repeal of Hate Laws
Post by: Br.IanVonTurpie on Fri 22 Nov 2013
It is surprising really coming from somebody like "Phoney Tony" he is so pro Israel, while people like Rudd were so Pro Chinese.

Well The racial and religious discrimination rules cancelled out free speech. People like Brenden O'Connell was Gaoled in Perth for saying something anti-Jew.
Title: Re: Jewish Supremacists Lead Minorities Blocking Repeal of Hate Laws
Post by: Br.IanVonTurpie on Fri 29 Nov 2013
http://www.ntnews.com.au/news/northern-territory/shop-bans-for-booze-crimes/story-fnk0b1zt-1226771665509 (http://www.ntnews.com.au/news/northern-territory/shop-bans-for-booze-crimes/story-fnk0b1zt-1226771665509)


NEW grog laws that would ban drink-drivers from entering supermarkets, restaurants and other licensed premises have been passed by the Territory Parliament. 
 

Alcohol Protection Orders can be issued to anyone charged with a drinking offence that would attract a potential jail term of six months - including things like loitering and singing obscene songs - and could be implemented before they're found guilty at law.
Chief Minister Adam Giles said yesterday he made "no apologies" for the new laws.

"There's a simple way of avoiding these restrictions: don't drink and then commit crimes, don't drink and then bash your wife, don't drink and then punch someone at the pub, don't drink and then drive home," Mr Giles said.

So If you say something "offensive" or have a concert with some naughty or racist words involved and you've consumed liquor you could be charged?


Title: Re: Jewish Supremacists Lead Minorities Blocking Repeal of Hate Laws
Post by: Rev.Cambeul on Sat 21 Dec 2013
Holocaust denialists back calls for reform of Australia's race hate laws

Noel Towell (http://www.smh.com.au/national/by/Noel-Towell) | Sydney Morning Herald (http://www.smh.com.au/) | December 21, 2013

http://www.smh.com.au/national/holocaust-denialists-back-calls-for-reform-of-australias-race-hate-laws-20131220-2zr0u.html (http://www.smh.com.au/national/holocaust-denialists-back-calls-for-reform-of-australias-race-hate-laws-20131220-2zr0u.html)

Australia's leading Holocaust denial group has backed the Abbott government's intention to water down the nation's race-hate laws.

The Adelaide Institute http://www.adelaideinstitute.org (http://www.adelaideinstitute.org), founded by convicted Holocaust denier Fredrick Toben, says section 18C of the Racial Discrimination Act and other laws on racial vilification stifle ''legitimate'' historical debate.

Attorney-General George Brandis and newly appointed Human Rights Commissioner Tim Wilson have both publicly called for the abolition of laws, last used against News Corp columnist Andrew Bolt over articles about light-skinned Aborigines.

Mr Wilson described the views of Dr Toben and his institute as ''repugnant'' and ''fantasyland rubbish'' but said he believed the courts were not the way to confront them.

Adelaide Institute director Peter Hartung said he did not have a view on Mr Wilson's appointment to the commission but that the denialist group supported the repeal of section 18C. "These laws stop discussion of things that can be proved with facts and figures so it cannot be debated,'' he said.

''These laws were brought in to shut people up when they have no rational argument against what they're saying.''

Critics have branded 18C the ''Bolt laws'' after the News Corp columnist's prosecution in 2011 for his ''inaccurate and offensive'' attack on a group of Aborigines. However, Section 18C has mostly been used by Australian Jewish groups against Holocaust deniers and Nazi sympathisers.

Mr Hartung said the Adelaide Institute was sympathetic to Mr Bolt's cause. ''What Andrew Bolt said was basically true and factual.''

Mr Wilson said that free and untrammelled public debate was a better way to confront Holocaust denial than anti-hate speech laws.

''Rather than hide in their caverns of hate, these people should be exposed for the stupidity and absurdity of their commentary in public debate so their names can be dragged through the dirt for all time,''
the newly appointed commissioner said. ''I disagree with people having recourse to the law to shut down public debate because there is a big difference between recourse to the law to protect yourself from physical violence, and protecting yourself from stupid and childish ideas.''

Dr Toben went to jail in 2009 for defying Federal Court orders to remove material from his website that claimed there were no gas chambers at Auschwitz, and describing the murder of millions of European Jews during World War II as the ''Holocaust myth''. He was convicted and jailed in 1999 in Germany for the specific crime of Holocaust denial.

Australia/Israel and Jewish Affairs Council spokesman Jeremy Jones, who has prosecuted Dr Toben using 18C , said he was ''not surprised'' the denialists wanted the laws scrapped. ''The minimum you would expect in a country like Australia is that people who are vilified by this material have some recourse to the law,'' Mr Jones said. ''The recourse that we're talking about is asking people to stop what they're doing; nobody was suggesting that people have any sort of onerous penalties.

''Under 18C you do not have an untrammelled right to destroy the quality of life of any other Australian with your words.''

A spokesman for Senator Brandis said he wanted to stop section 18C being used to stifle ''freedoms of speech''. ''The government wants to ensure that laws which are designed to prohibit racial vilification are not used as a vehicle to attack legitimate freedoms of speech,'' the spokesman said.

''The two values - protecting people against racial vilification and defending freedoms of speech - are not inconsistent.''
Title: Re: Jewish Supremacists Lead Minorities Blocking Repeal of Hate Laws
Post by: Edwin on Sat 21 Dec 2013
Not actually sure where this repeal will actually lead. I doubt it will be beneficial for us, if anything it's just an encouragement for us to speak out so we can be identified and vilified and hence unemployed for life.
Title: Re: Jewish Supremacists Lead Minorities Blocking Repeal of Hate Laws
Post by: Rev.Cambeul on Sat 21 Dec 2013
It's akin to the so-called anti-bikie laws. The JOG does not need additional and special laws to lock us away as Australia's leading Jewish Supremacist, Jeremy Jones claims. Those laws just make things a whole lot easier for the Jewish Supremacists to make their accusations with impunity. However, in the old days, you'd be 100% correct, in that as soon as the additional laws were repealed, many who've been in hiding would suddenly be out there enjoying themselves with a bit of old fashioned Jew Baiting - and I expect to see as much on Facebook and other worthless social networks we are forced to make use of these days. But for the majority of us, we tend to fall into step with a little self discipline, look at the bigger picture and recognise that nothing has really changed except for that fact that it is the government this time that is drawing the line between violence and calls for violence, and valid debate.

I look forward to the day when rather than being able to hide in their caverns of hate, these people - be they politicians, Marxist students or Jewish or other brands of Supremacists with the same hatred for freedom and a particular loathing for White people - are exposed for the stupidity and absurdity of their commentary in public debate so their names can be dragged through the dirt for all time.

@Cailen.
Title: Re: Jewish Supremacists Lead Minorities Blocking Repeal of Hate Laws
Post by: VanDamme on Mon 23 Dec 2013
The Jew is the master of hate. Their entire religious history is filled with hatred of none jews-i.e  Egyptians, Philistines, Canaanites, Amonnites, Assyrians, Persians, Sumerians, Babylonians. All White peoples, incidentally,  that they subsequently went on to genocide, mongrelise and enslave according to their own fictitious history. Their god Yahweh is the god of hatred who favours the Jews above all other peoples and who he exhorts to kill, enslave, genocide and mongrelise.
All races need to recognise the Jew for what he is- psychotic. Ultimately the Jews would even genocide peoples such as the Chinese, Indonesians, Muslims etc.
What is needed is a United Nations mandate to quarantine them from the rest of the world to protect everyone from their insanity.
Title: Re: Jewish Supremacists Lead Minorities Blocking Repeal of Hate Laws
Post by: PaulW on Mon 23 Dec 2013
Well its not nice being in quarantine , so how about bringing some older solutions back. But this time get it right. Just a thought.
;) ;)
Title: Re: Jewish Supremacists Lead Minorities Blocking Repeal of Hate Laws
Post by: Grimm on Thu 26 Dec 2013
It would be nice if there were some kind of emailing list, or phone number list or something developed for AU that would allow you to bring this attention to many others, of all kinda, so they could maybe voice their support of these kinds of repeals to their elected officials.


Maybe a simple mailing list/ calling list with the mission statement of "To contact community members to voice their concern about legislation that is restrictive of social freedoms." would be enough to get people on board.

Then using phone broadcasting equipment to contact these folks with the message of "This is a social calling for the blah blah contact list you signed up for. There is legislation  (input legislation citation) that is attempting to repeal restrictions related to social freedoms. Please contact your representative and tell them that you would appreciate their support to (input action) (input legislation citation)


http://www.evs7.com/voice-broadcasting.php (http://www.evs7.com/voice-broadcasting.php)

Title: Re: Jewish Supremacists Lead Minorities Blocking Repeal of Hate Laws
Post by: Rev.Cambeul on Thu 26 Dec 2013
Good suggestion Brother, but will not work here.

Just as it is everywhere, anyone found to be on the mailing list that doesn't immediately denounce it as anti-Semitism will be denounced as anti-Semites by the local chapters of the ADL. There will be calls for an investigation and there will be guaranteed arrests under Australia's federal anti-spam laws ... if not additional Hate Crime charges for offending Jews under the current - (let's be honest about it) but soon to be strengthened - laws.

@Cailen.
Title: Re: Jewish Supremacists Lead Minorities Blocking Repeal of Hate Laws
Post by: Grimm on Thu 26 Dec 2013
Rev. Cambeul, are you a member of any online legal forums? Maybe they would be a good place to kind of troubleshoot the possible legal pathways to make sure things are legal to do, instead of constantly running into the brick wall of "now you need to hire a lawyer".


It's just very distressing to hear that all of this stuff is going on "Downunder" and other places of the world, and that pretty much every suggestion to "fight the stranglehold" comes back with a response consisting of "there is no legal way to combat this".


I don't know how much more "watered down" and "politically correct" any group could get with a mission statement so vague and easily digestible to the masses as "for more social freedom".
Title: Re: Jewish Supremacists Lead Minorities Blocking Repeal of Hate Laws
Post by: Rev.Cambeul on Thu 26 Dec 2013
Those legal online forums are not what they profess to be. They consist of mere do-gooder, amateurish, student  lawyers who take information from people like us, process it and ship it off to the media and JOG with their own presumptuous recommendations for charges and sentencing. Right and wrong, legal and illegal - your rights to freedom of thought, freedom of speech and freedom of association mean nothing to these people. All that matters to them is being seen to be politically correct. Finding methods to circumvent the law in the name of political correctness is the name of their game. If you fit into their politically correct categories, they'll bend over backwards to help you - but if you don't ... then you are putting your job, home, family and your very life into their hands. And if you are a Creator or anyone that they can comfortably label as "Nazi," "Racist" or "White Supremacist" ... then you're screwed.

We have our own methods to educate and fight back. We have no need to risk dealing with politically correct pseudo lawyers. The laws will change time and again for both better and worse - but by the time the bloody racial war breaks out in earnest, we and our allies will know precisely where certain elements stand; and we will know precisely how to deal with them.

Leave them to their petty lawfare, we have a Racial Holy War to win; and win it, we will. RaHoWa!

@Cailen.
Title: Re: Jewish Supremacists Lead Minorities Blocking Repeal of Hate Laws
Post by: Grimm on Thu 26 Dec 2013
I some what agree with you about the legal forums not being dependable enough to sink too much merit into but I think it is a better start to find the proper legal pathways than hiring a lawyer.


Maybe some of those people in the legal forums would like to be invited to some other kind of forum where the general theme is dedicated towards solving legal hypothetical as opposed to what I see a lot of them being used for, which is people freaking out about immediate legal problems trying to figure out just how much trouble they got themselves into.

I know I've been on a "councils, associations, committee" obsession lately so right now I really wish there was some kind of "Association For Hypothetical Legal Exploration"

Sure, we could all just waste out on student learning material:

https://www.waikato.ac.nz/students/student-learning/academic/law_hypos/hypo1.shtml (https://www.waikato.ac.nz/students/student-learning/academic/law_hypos/hypo1.shtml)


but it would have to consist of people with more desire for legal knowledge and application than what I posses.
Title: Re: Jewish Supremacists Lead Minorities Blocking Repeal of Hate Laws
Post by: Rev.Cambeul on Wed 26 Mar 2014
Mundine urges PM to drop racial change

News.com.au (http://www.news.com.au/) | March 26, 2014

http://www.news.com.au/national/breaking-news/mundine-urges-pm-to-drop-racial-change/story-e6frfku9-1226864934756 (http://www.news.com.au/national/breaking-news/mundine-urges-pm-to-drop-racial-change/story-e6frfku9-1226864934756)

THE head of [Prime Minister] Tony Abbott's indigenous advisory council Warren Mundine says he has urged the prime minister to drop controversial plans to amend the Racial Discrimination Act.

{SNIP}

Mr Mundine, an indigenous leader and former national Labor president, said he copped racial abuse nearly every day. [So do I, but being White, racial abuse directed at me doesn't matter ~ Cailen.]

(https://lh3.ggpht.com/-sxpDlLHjX7Q/UrQ0Y4ywzSI/AAAAAAAA-Vg/fFmKnByaRbs/s1600/A%20KILL%20WHITEY%202.jpg)(https://images.encyclopediadramatica.es/thumb/9/95/Eng-hates-whitey.jpg/250px-Eng-hates-whitey.jpg)
(https://lh3.ggpht.com/-ioVlJuf4egA/Uol53Fqk5XI/AAAAAAAAKmc/z49ImvOzlls/s640/MpHB0c8.gif)(http://www.anunews.net/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/blackOnWhiteViolence.jpg)

"When you let people off the chain in regard to bigotry then you start having problems," he told ABC radio on Wednesday.

Mr Mundine said society made it quite clear that racism and bigotry were unacceptable. [... When directed at minorities ~ Cailen.]

{SNIP}

Labor, the Greens and some human rights groups fear amending the act will open the floodgates of racism and bigotry.

Mr Abbott says the government will maintain a "red light" against bigotry in a way that doesn't curb free speech.

Deputy Labor leader Tanya Plibersek said no one in Australia agreed with the government on this issue.

"It is a sad thing that one of the first priorities of this new government is to make it easier to racially abuse people," she told ABC radio. [It's already perfectly acceptable and therefore quite easy to racially abuse White people in Australia ~ Cailen.]

Ms Plibersek said numerous community organisations had been contacting her and her colleagues to express their concerns.

Attorney-General George Brandis said this was at heart a free speech issue and limitations needed to be crafted as narrowly as possible.

He said racist abuse would not fall within the exemption and racial vilification would always capture the concept of Holocaust denial, as featured the case of Fredrick Toben. [Again the Jew gets its own way and truth in history fails once again. Anyone caught publicly expressing a desire to partake in legitimate historical debate on any "minority" related subject runs the risk of running afoul of the law and finding themself locked in the Gulag ~ Cailen.]

"We want to protect racial minorities from the core concept of racism. The core concept of racism is the incitement of racial hatred or the causing of fear because of a person's race," he told ABC radio. [But the AG does not have any intention of protecting White people from the core concept of racism - just the racial minorities - Cailen.]




Comment:

There are two factors to consider here:
1. The changes in law will protect Left-Wing Neo-Cons (i.e. the Andrew Bolts of the world) from spurious claims of racism by racial minorities that seek to profit at the White man's expense.
2. Nothing will change for the White man, woman and child on the street. We - the ordinary White Australians - will continue to be subject to racial discrimination, racial abuse and racial violence from the ever increasing racial minorities. And the various Australian governments and media will continue to step in and persecute any White Australian who chooses to buck the system that has been put in place specifically for the benefit and advancement of racial minorities to the detriment of White Australians.

As I said earlier:
Quote from: Rev.Cambeul.PM on Thu 26 Dec 2013
We have our own methods to educate and fight back. ... The laws will change time and again for both better and worse - but by the time the bloody racial war breaks out in earnest, we and our allies will know precisely where certain elements stand; and we will know precisely how to deal with them.

Leave them to their petty lawfare, we have a Racial Holy War to win; and win it, we will. RaHoWa!

@Cailen.
Title: Re: Jewish Supremacists Lead Minorities Blocking Repeal of Hate Laws
Post by: Br.IanVonTurpie on Wed 26 Mar 2014
The racial vilification rules are nonsense rules! How can you have free speech rules if the racial vilification rules stymie debate?

So you can't say "The Koran encourages Muslims to be hot headed" as that is hate.

You can't tell your young child that Australia kicked all the Asians out during the gold rush because they came to trick us and undermine our colony and rip us off as that is "hate."

However they go around preaching how whitey is evil and how he duped the Abbos out of their land and now we owe them everything. This is not hate apparently.

Why can't you make racial jokes and have an opinion on other races and their culture? I miss the good old days!

Two Ronnies: Greedy Kike insurance against Catholicism! (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OBRiWcqMX6M#)
The Two Ronnies - Slant Eyed Arts (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VXok6R45lGg#)
The Two Ronnies - The Sand Nigger In The Grocery Store (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BcsMDgfyV6I#)

The Two Racists (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gdsTTsZVORE#)
Title: Re: Jewish Supremacists Lead Minorities Blocking Repeal of Hate Laws
Post by: Rev.Cambeul on Sat 29 Mar 2014
This has to be the biggest crock of * I've read from a holohoaxing Hebe in quite a while.




Holocaust survivor's plea to PM: don't change race laws

The New Daily (http://thenewdaily.com.au) | Moshe Fiszman (http://thenewdaily.com.au/author/moshe-fiszman/) | March 26, 2014

http://thenewdaily.com.au/news/2014/03/26/holocaust-survivors-plea-dont-change-race-laws-mr-abbott (http://thenewdaily.com.au/news/2014/03/26/holocaust-survivors-plea-dont-change-race-laws-mr-abbott)

Moshe Fiszman, 92, spent the Second World War in a series of Nazi concentration camps, including Auschwitz-Birkenau and Dachau. He was the only member of his family to survive. He has strong opinions on the proposed changes to race laws.

Dear Mr Abbott,

I beg you to abandon your plans to change the Racial Discrimination Act.

You might think you are increasing freedom, but let me assure you that you will be taking away the freedom of communities such as mine. The freedom to live without hatred and without lies being told about us.

That is why every single ethnic community is against this change. Some 39 communities have protested against it. Australia is a beautiful country because, like the United States, we are all migrants – not minorities. But if this law gets up, we will be made to feel like minorities.

You might think you are increasing freedom, but this change will hurt disadvantaged, underprivileged groups, like the Aborigines who regularly visit the Jewish Holocaust Museum. Most people are unaware that the Aborigines were one of the first groups to protest against the treatment of the Jews in Europe.

Like the Jews, Aborigines know what it is like to be discriminated against. I remember protesting in my broken English when they took the children away, and people asked me what I knew about it. I told them that I had seen children taken away from their mothers and that Australia would be sorry for it – and we are.

I came to this country because it was the furthest away from Europe I could get. Also, I had four years behind bars as a refugee after the war because nobody wanted me, so I had plenty of time to check out what Australia was made of. I researched its constitution and so forth, and I liked it.

We are quite happy with the freedom we have got at the moment. There is nothing wrong with it. For God's sake, you can do whatever you like in this country. We are even freer than in the United States.

What do they want to change this law for? If you start playing around with it, where will it end up? Who is it giving the freedom to? They want the right-wing loonies to have a free rein so they can write and say whatever they like and get away with it scot-free. Holocaust deniers like the Adelaide Institute.

They are talking about freedom of speech. I am free to speak. You are free to speak. People are free to speak. Who needs the improvement?

What they are trying to do, under the cover of free speech, is to give a free hand to people who should not speak in the first place. It is madness.

I tell students every day that freedom and liberty were given to you by God and no politician should have the right to take it away from you.

This is my opinion as a survivor, the opinion of a man who went through living hell for five-and-a-half years, on death row for 24 hours a day. I am dead against it. Don't let them touch the freedom of the people in the country.

At the moment I am an Australian. I am not defined as being a Jew or a Catholic or a Protestant. But if these laws go through, we will end up as members of minority groups. Then Gold help us.

I love this country. There is no other country in the world as free as ours. Please don't change the law, Mr Abbott.

Yours sincerely,

Moshe Fiszman.


Title: Re: Jewish Supremacists Lead Minorities Blocking Repeal of Hate Laws
Post by: Br.IanVonTurpie on Sun 30 Mar 2014
We are quite happy with the freedom we have got at the moment. There is nothing wrong with it. For God's sake, you can do whatever you like in this country. We are even freer than in the United States.



That's why people live Rev Cambeul have the thought police come over and confiscate his computers, and give him a hard time for being a White Nationalist.
Title: Re: Jewish Supremacists Lead Minorities Blocking Repeal of Hate Laws
Post by: Rev.Cambeul on Sat 05 Apr 2014
Proposed Discrimination Law is 'Deeply Flawed,' Says Jewish Group
The Australian Jewish News
http://www.jewishnews.net.au/new-legislation-deeply-flawed/34495 (http://www.jewishnews.net.au/new-legislation-deeply-flawed/34495)
Holocaust denier Fredrick Toben, who was successfully prosecuted persecuted in 2009 under Section 18C of the Racial Discrimination Act, would have been protected under a new sub-section in the government's proposed race law amendments, according to the Executive Council of Australian Jewry (ECAJ). A clause in Attorney-General George Brandis's draft legislation ... would have made it almost impossible to successfully sue Toben, ECAJ executive director Peter Wertheim said.

Proposed Changes to Racial Vilification Laws a 'Colossal Mistake,' Australian Politician Tells Jewish Group
The Sydney Morning Herald (Australia)
http://www.smh.com.au/federal-politics/political-news/changes-to-racial-vilification-laws-a-colossal-mistake-shorten-20140330-35reg.html (http://www.smh.com.au/federal-politics/political-news/changes-to-racial-vilification-laws-a-colossal-mistake-shorten-20140330-35reg.html)
Opposition leader Bill Shorten says growing fears that Holocaust deniers could avoid prosecution under proposed changes to the racial vilification laws is proof enough the government is making a "colossal mistake". In a Sunday speech in Melbourne to Jewish community leaders, Mr Shorten argued how any watering down of protections under the Racial Discrimination Act would be a giant step backwards.
Title: Re: Jewish Supremacists Lead Minorities Blocking Repeal of Hate Laws
Post by: Br.IanVonTurpie on Sat 31 May 2014
http://www.skynews.com.au/news/top-stories/2014/05/31/racial-discrimination-act-plans.html?cid=BP_RSS_SN-TOPSTORIES_1_RacialDiscriminationActplans_310514 (http://www.skynews.com.au/news/top-stories/2014/05/31/racial-discrimination-act-plans.html?cid=BP_RSS_SN-TOPSTORIES_1_RacialDiscriminationActplans_310514)

The Chief Indigenous Affairs advisor to the Prime Minister has given the strongest indication yet that the government will move away from proposed changes to the Racial Discrimination Act.

The plan was to remove section 18C which makes vilification illegal, but Warren Mundine (Muddy)has told Sky News his advice is to drop it.Federal Indigenous affairs minister Nigel Scullion has welcomed calls by Warren Mundine to walk away from the proposed changes to the racial discrimination act.

He's called on the PM and Attorney General to make a decision and announce it swiftly.Former test cricketer Adam Gilchrist has joined AFL legend, Michael Long, for speedy recognition of Australia's first people.

They say constitutional recognition of indigenous Australians is long overdue, and it is now time for the nation to come together to right the wrongs of the past.Gilchrist has called on the Prime minister and the Attorney General to make a decision and announce it swiftly.
Title: Re: Jewish Supremacists Lead Minorities Blocking Repeal of Hate Laws
Post by: Rev.Cambeul on Thu 10 Jul 2014
The whining black bitch that is the African community of South Australia has now jumped on the band wagon, claiming themselves to be the eternal victims of evil Whitey.

And the story is brought to you by the Marxist whore of Australian journalism herself, Tory Shepherd.


South Australia's African community tells Prime Minister Tony Abbott about culture of racial vilification in community they face daily

Tory Shepherd | The Adelaide Advertiser | 09 July 2014

http://www.adelaidenow.com.au/news/south-australia/south-australias-african-community-tells-prime-minister-tony-abbott-about-culture-of-racial-vilification-in-community-they-face-daily/story-fni6uo1m-1226983601954?from=public_rss (http://www.adelaidenow.com.au/news/south-australia/south-australias-african-community-tells-prime-minister-tony-abbott-about-culture-of-racial-vilification-in-community-they-face-daily/story-fni6uo1m-1226983601954?from=public_rss)

RACISM is an everyday experience for Africans in South Australia, the Federal Government has been told.

The African Community Organisation of SA has written to Prime Minister Tony Abbott regarding the proposed changes to racial vilification laws saying there is a "culture of vilification" in the community.

"There is no day that passes that I don't hear of racial vilification in the community, either by emails, telephone, and radio or even in person," the organisation's President David Malinda has written.

"Most Africans experience racial and discriminatory behaviours in the workplace, schools, community access/funding, sports, local governance, business and at universities because there is a culture of vilification that has never had a strong government that puts laws that make it a criminal case to racially abuse people of different races."

Mr Malinda told The Advertiser yesterday that racism can begin with vilification, but bubble over into violence.

The organisation wanted the Racial Discrimination Act kept as it is. [more ... (http://www.adelaidenow.com.au/news/south-australia/south-australias-african-community-tells-prime-minister-tony-abbott-about-culture-of-racial-vilification-in-community-they-face-daily/story-fni6uo1m-1226983601954?from=public_rss)]
Title: Re: Jewish Supremacists Lead Minorities Blocking Repeal of Hate Laws
Post by: Rev.Cambeul on Mon 11 Aug 2014
The Jew gets its own way - Who rules Australia's political landscape now?


Australian Jews Block Change in Local Race-Hate Laws

JTA - Times of Israel (http://www.timesofisrael.com/)

http://www.timesofisrael.com/australian-jews-block-change-in-local-race-hate-laws (http://www.timesofisrael.com/australian-jews-block-change-in-local-race-hate-laws)

Jewish community leaders welcomed the Australian government's decision to scrap plans to repeal parts of the nation's race-hate laws. Prime Minister Tony Abbott had pledged to dilute sections of the Racial Discrimination Act in a bid to safeguard freedom of speech, but when the government asked for community consultation, it received a chorus of condemnation, led by the Jewish community. On Tuesday, Abbott announced the government's plans are "off the table." ... Jewish leaders have previously used section 18c of the law to litigate successfully against Holocaust deniers, anti-Semites and religious extremists, and lobbied heavily against the government's proposed changes.
Title: Re: Jewish Supremacists Lead Minorities Blocking Repeal of Hate Laws
Post by: Rev.Cambeul on Mon 11 Aug 2014
Australian PM Caves in to Jewish Lobby on Free Speech Laws

Brenton Sanderson (http://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/author/brenton-sanderson/) | Occidental Observer (http://www.theoccidentalobserver.net) | 14 August 2014

http://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/2014/08/australian-pm-caves-in-to-jewish-lobby-on-free-speech-laws (http://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/2014/08/australian-pm-caves-in-to-jewish-lobby-on-free-speech-laws)

(http://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/abbott.jpg)
Australian Prime Minister Tony Abbott claims that all Australians are Jewish

In the face of a coordinated and sustained campaign initiated and led by Jewish activists, the Australian Prime Minister Tony Abbott has abandoned his 2013 election promise to water down or remove Section 18C of Australia's Racial Discrimination Act which makes it unlawful to act in a manner likely to "offend, insult, humiliate or intimidate" someone on the basis of race. Abbott said he had made a "leadership decision" to walk away from his pledge despite having promised to remove this outrageous restriction on the free speech after the law was used successfully against conservative columnist Andrew Bolt in 2011.

It is a measure of the power wielded by organized Jewry in Australia that the Prime Minister would rather damage his political credibility by breaking a clear election promise than suffer the consequences of defying the single most powerful group in Australian society. Abbott, who made the announcement while outlining an extension of anti-terrorism laws, attempted to justify his broken promise by claiming "I don't want to do anything that puts our national unity at risk at this time and so those proposals are now off the table." Abbott's apparent desire to not further alienate Australia's problematic Islamic community by repealing Section 18C (at a time when the government is set to strengthen laws against terrorism) is an obvious political smokescreen. The veteran Jewish journalist, Michael Gawenda, writing in the Business Spectator, identified the real reason behind the Prime Minister walking away from his election commitment:

Quote from: Michael Gawenda, The Business Spectator
https://www.businessspectator.com.au/article/2014/8/6/national-affairs/real-reason-abbott-broke-his-promise-section-18c (https://www.businessspectator.com.au/article/2014/8/6/national-affairs/real-reason-abbott-broke-his-promise-section-18c)

While Abbott said that the decision to ditch the plan to rid the Racial Discrimination Act of section 18C was taken because of "complications" in dealing with Islamic communities in the context of the proposed tough new terrorism laws, it seems likely that more was involved in this decision. The conflict in Gaza and the coverage and reaction to this appalling, heartbreaking conflagration, in my opinion, made it virtually certain that any move to change or abolish section 18C would extract too high a political price.

The repeal of section 18C was vigorously opposed by the leadership of virtually every ethnic community in the country. But it would be fair to say — without wishing to give succor to those who reckon the Jews are too powerful — that Jewish community leaders have played a crucial role in organizing the opposition to any potential change to the RDA.  It is the opposition of the Jewish communal leaders that had been of major concern to [Attorney General] Brandis and, to a significant extent, Tony Abbott.

Gawenda notes that the Jewish community's overwhelming support for Section 18C (which was itself originally the legislative result of submissions by organized Jewry to the National Inquiry into Racist Violence and the Royal Commission into Aboriginal Deaths in Custody in 1995) is linked to the broader Jewish commitment to "multiculturalism" in Australia.

Quote from: Michael Gawenda, The Business Spectator
https://www.businessspectator.com.au/article/2014/8/6/national-affairs/real-reason-abbott-broke-his-promise-section-18c (https://www.businessspectator.com.au/article/2014/8/6/national-affairs/real-reason-abbott-broke-his-promise-section-18c)

The main reason that Brandis and Abbott were most concerned about the opposition of the Jewish communal leadership to any changes to section 18C is because the Jewish community is generally seen as a role model for successful multiculturalism. It is for these reasons that the Jewish communal leadership has played such an outsized role in the campaign against the watering down or elimination of section 18C. If the Jewish community is a prime example of successful multiculturalism, then its support for the retention of 18C, its highly effective campaign against any change to the RDA on the basis that any change would seriously undermine multiculturalism and free the racists to say whatever they please, represented serious political pain for Brandis and Abbott.

Gawenda is disingenuous in claiming that the source of the Jewish community's power in this debate resides in its being a "role model for successful multiculturalism" rather than in its status as a group with the kind of financial, political and media clout to instil genuine fear in those who oppose its interests. As in the United States, Jewish money exerts a dominating influence over Australian politics, which guarantees that most politicians are willing to put the Australian Defense Forces (and Australian taxpayers) to the service of an ethno-nationalist state in which Australia has no economic or strategic interest. The Jewish academic and activist Dan Goldberg acknowledges that: "The annual report of the Australian Electoral Commission always includes Jewish names and Jewish-owned companies donating large sums to both sides of politics."(i)

The sway held by organized Jewry over Australia's political leaders was highlighted earlier this year when the former Foreign Minister Bob Carr hit out at the "pro-Israel lobby in Melbourne," saying it wielded "extraordinary influence" on Australia's foreign policy during his time in former Prime Minister Julia Gillard's cabinet. Asked how the lobby achieved this influence he said: "I think party donations and a program of giving trips to MPs and journalists to Israel. But that's not to condemn them. I mean, other interest groups do the same thing. But it needs to be highlighted because I think it reached a very unhealthy level." Carr's observations were later corroborated by the former [Jewish] Australian Prime Minister Malcolm Fraser who said Carr was "absolutely correct" in his view that the Jewish lobby wielded too much power.

Gawenda asserts that, unlike the vast majority of Australian Jews, he was originally in favor of the proposal to water down Section 18C of the Act until recent events gave him pause for thought: in particular the widespread criticism of Israel and its supporters for their attempts to justify the appalling massacre of Palestinian civilians in Gaza:

Quote from: Michael Gawenda, The Business Spectator
https://www.businessspectator.com.au/article/2014/8/6/national-affairs/real-reason-abbott-broke-his-promise-section-18c (https://www.businessspectator.com.au/article/2014/8/6/national-affairs/real-reason-abbott-broke-his-promise-section-18c)

But here's the thing. I believe that in recent days, in the light of what has been published about Jews and the conflict in Gaza, the clearly anti-Semitic cartoon in the Sydney Morning Herald, for instance — for which the SMH has issued an apology in an editorial that I found unsatisfactory —\ not to mention the astounding amount of outright racist filth to be found on social media, it may no longer be the case that we can trust editors and executive producers when it comes to ensuring that what amounts to vilification is not given any room in mainstream commentary and analysis.

So, for Gawenda, the recent (and entirely legitimate) criticism of the actions of the ethno-nationalist state of Israel and its Zionist cheerleaders in the West only serves to confirm that Jewish leaders were right to oppose any changes to Section 18C. The criticism of the Israeli government and those who would defend its barbarity in Gaza simply confirms for Gawenda that Australians cannot be trusted with unfettered free speech. Incidentally, the supposedly "anti-Semitic" cartoon in the Sydney Morning Herald to which he refers is less an anti-Semitic caricature and more an accurate representation of actual events — of Israeli citizens sitting outside to watch and cheer the bombing of the helpless Palestinian civilians as entertainment.

(http://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/Gaza-cartoon-e1407512178121.jpg)
(http://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/gaza2-e1407512279153.jpg)

Likewise, for the Australian Jewish academic and activist Danny Ben-Moshe, the slaughter in Gaza "has led to the crossing of new anti-Semitic thresholds with the potential to take us down a dangerous path. It is a path not laid with guns and bullets, but with loose and manipulative language."  According to Gawenda, it was the sudden outbreak of truth-telling about Israel and the dishonesty of its apologists that reinvigorated the campaign by Australian Jewish leaders to oppose any changes to Section 18C of the Racial Discrimination Act:

Quote from: Michael Gawenda, The Business Spectator
https://www.businessspectator.com.au/article/2014/8/6/national-affairs/real-reason-abbott-broke-his-promise-section-18c (https://www.businessspectator.com.au/article/2014/8/6/national-affairs/real-reason-abbott-broke-his-promise-section-18c)

It is this that made Jewish community leaders more determined than ever to oppose any change to section 18C of the Racial Discrimination Act. And in the main, Jews in Australia support the communal leadership on this issue. No one can doubt that there has been an alarming rise in anti-Semitism in Europe, something that is hardly reported in most of the Australian media. Jews feel under threat — in some cases physical threat — in France and Belgium and Germany and even in England. Not to mention Hungary, where an openly anti-Semitic party has garnered significant support. Thousands of French Jews have left France for Israel and other places. The numbers leaving every month are growing.

Though there has not been a similar rise in virulent anti-Semitism in Australia, Jews in Australia nevertheless have good reason to believe that if the virus of anti-Semitism is spreading in Europe, it might one day reach these shores. In this environment, Tony Abbott decided that the plan to change section 18C, a solemn promise he had made to Bolt and to his supporters at the Institute of Public Affairs had to be abandoned. Will there be a better political time to resurrect these proposed changes? Almost certainly not.

Note the standard pathologization of anti-Jewish sentiment as a "virus" that has nothing whatever to do with Jewish behavior. On the other hand, the reflexive Jewish hostility toward Europeans (which has led to the demographic transformation of Western nations over the last few decades) is apparently not a virus, but stems, rather, from some highly developed sense of fairness and universal brotherhood that is inherent in all Jews. Of course, what Gawenda won't acknowledge is that the only reason Jews are increasingly subject to anti-Semitic attacks in countries like France and England is because of mass non-White (particularly Muslim) immigration and multiculturalism — both of which are the malignant outgrowths of Jewish ethnic activism.

A disappointed Andrew Bolt observed (http://www.theaustralian.com.au/national-affairs/tony-abbott-says-proposed-racial-discrimination-act-changes-wont-be-revived/story-fn59niix-1227015125755) that Jewish leaders would ultimately regret opposing changes to the Act, noting that: "The Jewish leaders now should look very, very deeply into their souls at what they have helped wrought and ask themselves, are you seriously safer now as a result?" Bolt's reasoning is that under Section 18C Australian Jews will in future be precluded from criticizing the beliefs and actions of a growing and increasingly militant Australian Islamic community which will be increasingly hostile to Israel and the interests of Australian Jews.

As with Gawenda, Bolt fails to mention that the only reason there are any Muslims in Australia at all (with all their myriad problems and social dysfunctions) is because Jewish activism succeeded in ending the White Australia policy and establishing multiculturalism as the basis for social policy in Australia. As The Jewish academic Dan Goldberg proudly acknowledges: "In addition to their activism on Aboriginal issues, Jews were instrumental in leading the crusade against the White Australia policy, a series of laws from 1901 to 1973 that restricted non-White immigration to Australia." It is clear that the Jewish fear and loathing of White Australia trumps any concern about the anti-Semitic tendencies among non-White immigrants that are being imported into the nation.

The Jewish writer Peta Jones-Pellach is not alone in expressing the view that Australian Jews should always back the Muslim minority in any conflict with White Australia, arguing that "We recognize that our ongoing harmonious acceptance into the Australian community depends on forging bonds with the increasing numbers of non-Jewish Australians who might be our theological opponents or even our enemies."[ii] The supposed benefits to Australian Jewry that multiculturalism has bestowed – most notably the diminished threat of the emergence of a mass movement of anti-Semitism from White Australians — is seen as having far outweighed any negative effects of large scale Islamic immigration such as the fact that: "Some Australian Jews fear that migrants arriving from Muslim countries will contribute to anti-Semitic currents in Australia, inflame extremist groups and pose a threat to the relative peace they currently enjoy."[iii]

The rise of Islamic anti-Semitism in the West reveals a paradoxical element of the overwhelming Jewish support for multiculturalism; an element which resulted in the emergence and growth of neoconservatism. Kevin MacDonald notes that: "Although multiculturalist ideology was invented by Jewish intellectuals to rationalize the continuation of separatism and minority-group ethnocentrism in a modern Western state, several of the recent instantiations of multiculturalism may eventually produce a monster with negative consequences for Judaism."[iv] Australian Jewish activists like Dan Goldberg recognize the danger, and he notes that:

Quote from: Dan GoldbergHerein lies an underlying tension that exists in the psyche of Australian Jews in the new millennium: on the one hand understanding the fundamental wrong in tarring all Muslims with the same extremist brush; on the other hand feeling great unease in showing support for Muslims, some of whose brothers are waging jihad against Israel and the Jews. ... Many Australian Jews are therefore caught between these tides, ostensibly supportive of minority rights but cognizant of the fact that among the Muslim community are radical elements who seek our destruction. [v]

Despite these concerns, most Australian Jews see themselves as the longer-term beneficiaries of policies explicitly designed to dilute the power of the traditional European-derived Australian majority. Australian Jewry has therefore sought to make alliances with various immigrant groups in opposition to the White majority, including Muslims. Attempts to form a political coalition with Australian Muslims date from the earliest days of Australian multiculturalism. Australian Jews sought Muslim support for the enactment of the racial discrimination legislation recommended by the Lippmann-chaired Committee on Community Relations in the mid-1970s (http://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/2012/08/the-war-on-white-australia-a-case-study-in-the-culture-of-critique-part-4-of-5/). In the years since, Jews have repeatedly sought the support of the Muslim community in lobbying for various multicultural policies, including those relating to "access to government services, recourse for victims of discrimination, and protection from harassment." Jewish activism organizations such as the Australia/Israel & Jewish Affairs Council was quick to enlist Australia's Muslim leaders in their campaign to oppose any changed to Section 18C of the Racial Discrimination Act.

According to Jeremy Jones, the director of international and community affairs of the Australia/Israel & Jewish Affairs Council, "the relationship between Australian Jews and Muslims has developed positively over the past decade." Nevertheless, he believes that "maintaining the momentum will require leadership and determination, but there are good grounds for optimism given the network of relations and shared fruitful experiences in contemporary multicultural Australia."

Clearly, Australian Jewry believes that, despite the threat to Jews represented by the strong anti-Jewish sentiment in growing sections of the Australian Islamic community, the relationship is basically manageable in the longer-term.

Having won the battle over Section 18C, it is certain that activist Jews will push for even tougher restrictions on freedom of speech in Australia, and indeed throughout the West. The attempt to confine public discourse to within parameters that do not threaten Jewish interests has been a central preoccupation of Jewish activists for many decades. American Jewish activist organizations like the ADL and the SPLC certainly do not view the American constitution as an insuperable barrier to the imposition of laws like to Section 18C in the United States.




(i) Goldberg, D. (2006) 'After 9/11: The Psyche of Australian Jews,' In: New Under the Sun – Jewish Australians on Religion, Politics & Culture, Ed. Michael Fagenblat, Melanie Landau & Nathan Wolski, Black Inc., Melbourne. 151 [ii] Peta Jones Pellach, "Interfaith Dialogue and the State of Israel," In: New Under the Sun – Jewish Australians on Religion, Politics & Culture, Ed. Michael Fagenblat, Melanie Landau & Nathan Wolski (Melbourne, Black Inc., 2006), 139. [iii] Marcus Einfeld, "We Too Have Been Strangers: Jews and the Refugee Struggle," In: New Under the Sun – Jewish Australians on Religion, Politics & Culture, Ed. Michael Fagenblat, Melanie Landau & Nathan Wolski (Melbourne: Black Inc., 2006), 311 & 314. [iv] MacDonald, The Culture of Critique: An Evolutionary Analysis of Jewish Involvement in Twentieth‑Century Intellectual and Political Movements, (Westport, CT: Praeger, Revised Paperback edition, 2001), 313. [v] Goldberg "After 9/11: The Psyche of Australian Jews," 145 & 146
Title: Re: Jewish Supremacists Lead Minorities Blocking Repeal of Hate Laws
Post by: Rev.Cambeul on Tue 13 Jan 2015
#JeSuisCharlesMartel Any of the officialdom from Australia currently talking about the Charlie Hebdo slayings in France as being an attack on freedom of speech is a hypocrite! And here's the proof ...


Being Charlie — with 18c in place, Australia says 'non'

Joe Kelly | The Australian (http://www.theaustralian.com.au/) | 13 January 2015

http://www.theaustralian.com.au/in-depth/terror/being-charlie-with-18c-in-place-australia-says-non/story-fnpdbcmu-1227182736935 (https://www.google.com.au/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&ved=0CCAQqQIwAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.theaustralian.com.au%2Fin-depth%2Fterror%2Fbeing-charlie-with-18c-in-place-australia-says-non%2Fstory-fnpdbcmu-1227182736935&ei=D1W0VJv3DqLUmgXgwIKACA&usg=AFQjCNEWElS53l7XJEFXOtKHd6d8-1aTwA&sig2=vWjBeaXcqdihSt_XOCIc3A)

SATIRICAL French publication Charlie Hebdo could not be printed in Australia under existing restrictions on free speech, despite its cartoons being embraced across the world as a symbol of Western liberties after the massacre at its offices.

Human Rights Commissioner Tim Wilson told The Australian the restrictions contained in section 18c of the Racial Discrimin�ation Act would "ensure it would be shut down"; he was supported in this position by media law �experts.

The carnage in Paris has also encouraged two Liberal MPs to publicly call for the debate about changes to section 18c to be re-opened after the government last year unceremoniously dropped its planned reforms following a fierce public [Jewish supremacist led, Abo and Muslim] backlash.

Mr Wilson, dubbed the "freedom commissioner", has taken aim at opponents of the 18c changes who are now rhetorically embracing free speech, warning that words needed to be backed up with concrete action.

Failure to do so would be seen as hypocritical, he said.

"The Charlie Hebdo attack is a wake-up call for a lot of people who rhetorically support free speech but when it comes to the nub would choose political �advantage over sensible reform," he said.

"This is where they have an opportunity to rise to the challenge, like the leaders of Europe are now doing, rather than being held out as hypocrites."

In The Australian today, the chairman of the parliamentary joint committee on human rights, West Australian senator Dean Smith, challenges Tony Abbott and Bill Shorten to support a private senator's bill proposing a middle pathway forward on an 18c overhaul.

The Opposition Leader yesterday indicated he remained unmoved on 18c.

{SNIP}

While Mr Wilson argued that many of the religiously themed cartoons in Charlie Hebdo would not fall foul of the discrimination act, he said that racial stereo�typing of Jews and other ethnic groups would create too many legal issues for such a publication to continue in an Australian context.

"18c only covers issues of race and ethnic origin, which would cover some of the material but not all of it," he said. "It would cover Jews
and ethnic representations, but it wouldn't cover Muslims and other bits. In the end, the legal problems would essentially ensure it would be shut down.

"I think there are lots of different avenues for reform, but I think there are more issues than just 18c that need to be considered."

Senator Smith threw his support behind Mr Wilson, but urged for a renewed focus on 18c. He is urging both sides of politics to back a private senator's bill he has co-sponsored with Family First senator Bob Day, Liberal Democrat David Leyonhjelm and Liberal colleague Cory Bernardi.

Senator Smith says the bill could form a "legislative monument to the human price paid by France" and would simply remove the words "offend" and "insult" in a finetuning of 18c.

"By agreeing (to the bill) ... Tony Abbott and Bill Shorten will have kept the protections against �'humiliate' and 'intimidate'," he writes. "Our leaders have read the mood with precision and Tony Abbott is right to remind us to be prepared to 'speak up for our �beliefs' and 'call things as we see them'. It is now time to crown our words of vigilance with a deed."

Senator Bernardi said he absolutely supported the passage of the bill.

Simon Breheny, the director of the legal rights project at the Institute of Public Affairs, told The Australian that Charlie Hebdo's cartoons certainly "would have been caught in Australia by section 18c of the Racial Discrimin�ation Act".

"Even if it wasn't caught by section 18c, there is no doubt they would have fallen foul of restrictive state racial and religious vilification laws. This is one of the possible explanations as to why we don't have any kind of publi�cations in Australia quite like it, because our laws restricting freedom of speech are so severe."

Legal experts also united to suggest that Charlie Hebdo would be unlikely to meet the existing tests enshrined in current Australian law, pointing out that satirical cartoons do not occupy the same status in Australian culture.

"You would have a complaint if those sorts of cartoons were to run here," said Minter Ellison Partner and Fairfax media lawyer in Victoria Peter Bartlett.

"I think they would certainly, run up against 18c and we would receive complaints and we would then need to deal with those �complaints."

Mr Bartlett also warned that there was already "some evidence of self-censoring", given the �caution around the existing racial discrimination laws.

Justin Quill, a media lawyer used by The Australian, said the publication would have "serious difficulties" and would constantly need to justify its actions. "If someone took action against them — probably more than once — it ultimately would mean that it would be difficult to survive and it could mean it had to be shut down," he said.

"I can easily say I think there would be occasions where it would lose an 18c argument.

"It's easy for those who support 18c to say 'I think they wouldn't'. What is clear is that the publication would have to successfully bear the onus of proof in proving their defence."
Title: Re: Jewish Supremacists Lead Minorities Blocking Repeal of Hate Laws
Post by: W.Anthony on Tue 05 May 2015
Whoa, I had no idea Holocaust denial was illegal in Australia. Then again, it's illegal here too. Not in the law of course, but no one seems to protest when men like Ernst Zundel are deported because they denied the Holocaust.
Tread carefully my brothers.
Title: Re: Jewish Supremacists Lead Minorities Blocking Repeal of Hate Laws
Post by: Rev.Cambeul on Tue 05 May 2015
Quote from: josephdamsell on Tue 05 May 2015Whoa, I had no idea Holocaust denial was illegal in Australia.

It's not illegal, but they will Zundel you here if they can. Typically, as happened with Doctor Frederick Toben, they will gather their money and lawyers, make a private application to the court to find your words and actions to be offensive to their Semitic sensibilities, and the court will guaranteed judge you to be guilty, judge you to be recalcitrant, judge your words to be a physical threat, hand down orders, fine and sentence you - all at the orders of some Jew that has a private grudge with you. In Australia, that's the leaders of the Executive Council of Australian Jewry - which comes under orders from the same old B'nai Brith bunch that rule every other Jewish Supremacist organisation in the world at the expense of the U.S. taxpayer.

These days, whenever they mention Doctor Toben in their libellous outpourings, they usually mention me as well. The reason they went after Doctor Toben privately through the courts and leave me alone, is because Doctor Toben had something to lose; while I have nothing. It can also be argued that Doctor Toben's publicly state views - like Zundel's - were his views, and his alone. And without him around, his compatriots would disappear completely. While I represent a religious organisation that the Jewish Supremacists denounce at every opportunity, but recognise that our Holy Books, recordings and other texts are legally less offensive than is their Torah - the First Testament of the Christian Bible. Their Jewish scripture actually calls variously for the conquest, extermination and enslavement of entire races of people opposed to Jews; while ours merely points out that the Jew is doing exactly that at this very moment to the White Race through lawfare, and that it is the Holy Duty of our Creed to resist the Jew on all fronts. Further, if the Jew and its JOG allies go one step further and cease to follow their own rules of law and order and persecution and murder of CREATORS becomes the order of the day, then we will fight back in what will be a Bloody Racial War. A RaHoWa that will begin with the deaths of the Rabbis at CREATOR hands. That is all part of our Creed and often used out of context against us, but it is something we will only do, if we have no choice other than to stand and be murdered as per Rabbinic order.

@Cailen.
Title: Re: Jewish Supremacists Lead Minorities Blocking Repeal of Hate Laws
Post by: Br.IanVonTurpie on Wed 06 May 2015
Look what the Kikes did to Brenden O'Connell in Western Australia. This is a show of contempt!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S5CsmBYuFjg (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S5CsmBYuFjg)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GbvlIICTRTE (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GbvlIICTRTE)


Title: Re: Jewish Supremacists Lead Minorities Blocking Repeal of Hate Laws
Post by: Rev.Cambeul on Tue 30 Aug 2016
Mainstream politician using our language? It's 04:27am in the morning ... Am I still asleep and caught in a dream?

Critics of push to reform 18C are racist, says Cory Bernardi

Sarah Martin (http://twitter.com/msmarto) | The Australian (http://www.theaustralian.com.au/) | 31 August 2016

http://www.theaustralian.com.au/national-affairs/critics-of-push-to-reform-18c-are-racist-says-cory-bernardi/news-story/ce67516f9020bcd22b530366a0e39da8 (https://www.google.com.au/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&ved=0ahUKEwi6stKH5unOAhWKjZQKHZwBBGAQqQIIHTAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.theaustralian.com.au%2Fnational-affairs%2Fcritics-of-push-to-reform-18c-are-racist-says-cory-bernardi%2Fnews-story%2Fce67516f9020bcd22b530366a0e39da8&usg=AFQjCNF0vMnXFXDJcvEmEkBfq46bgwyjYg&sig2=QPz-4svjuZb4NiCpnakZsQ)

Extract: Liberal Cory Bernardi has hit out at critics of his push to remove restrictions on ­offensive and insulting speech, ­accusing some of being racist against white people, as he storms ahead with a renewed bid to change the Racial Discrimin­ation Act.

Rebelling against Malcolm Turnbull's call for MPs to focus on budget repair, the conservative South Australian senator will today present a bill to amend ­section 18C of the act, co-sponsored by 20 senators, including all but one of the Coalition's 14 upper house backbenchers.

He will also table a petition signed by 15,027 people to demonstrate it is a "bread and butter" issue for the conservative base.

"What I am hoping for is my colleagues and the public will inform themselves as fully as they possibly can about the dangers of section 18C and how ... by amending it we can protect free speech and also protect people from vilification and intimidation," Senator Bernardi told The Australian.

Crossbench senators Bob Day, David Leyonhjelm and Derryn Hinch and One Nation's four new senators are also backing the bill, prompting suggestions on social media the issue was being pursued by 20 "white" people.

Senator Bernardi, who this week leaves for a four-month placement at the UN, said the ­suggestion only white people supported the change was racist.

It "is basically telling the parliament that some laws can only be proposed by people of a particular colour skin. These people are ­offensive, they are insulting and they demonstrate everything that is wrong with section 18C and the grievance industry," he said. [more ...] (https://www.google.com.au/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&ved=0ahUKEwi6stKH5unOAhWKjZQKHZwBBGAQqQIIHTAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.theaustralian.com.au%2Fnational-affairs%2Fcritics-of-push-to-reform-18c-are-racist-says-cory-bernardi%2Fnews-story%2Fce67516f9020bcd22b530366a0e39da8&usg=AFQjCNF0vMnXFXDJcvEmEkBfq46bgwyjYg&sig2=QPz-4svjuZb4NiCpnakZsQ)
Title: Re: Jewish Supremacists Lead Minorities Blocking Repeal of Hate Laws
Post by: Rev.Cambeul on Wed 31 Aug 2016
In a probably racist anti-White act ...

Human Rights Commission broke rules over race complaint

Hedley Thomas (http://www.theaustralian.com.au/author/Hedley+Thomas) | The Australian (http://www.theaustralian.com.au/) | 1 September 2016

http://www.theaustralian.com.au/national-affairs/indigenous/human-right-commission-broke-rules-over-race-complaint/news-story/4205e68f9f1619dbcdf77b18d3dd71f2 (https://www.google.com.au/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&ved=0ahUKEwiboazk0ezOAhXGGJQKHaB2B-wQqQIIHjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.theaustralian.com.au%2Fnational-affairs%2Findigenous%2Fhuman-right-commission-broke-rules-over-race-complaint%2Fnews-story%2F4205e68f9f1619dbcdf77b18d3dd71f2&usg=AFQjCNHHMQjDjUC2yS3avAMSnU8jKSkhWQ&sig2=OvvxLIR7v8aKM3TbI0hR1Q)

A Freedom of Information disclosure to students accused of ­racism shows the Human Rights Commission did not follow its own guidelines before the complaint of (Aboriginal woman) Cindy Prior advanced to the Federal Circuit Court.

The commission's handbook has prescriptive procedures for complaints of racial hatred under section 18C of the Racial Discrimination Act, which is cited by Ms Prior, an indigenous former Queensland University of Technology staffer, in her $250,000 legal case against students for their Facebook posts.

The handbook cautions staff to "be careful to ensure the neutrality of your approach" when dealing with people who are the subject of such complaints, adding "no assumptions should be made about the validity of the complaint or views expressed as to its substance".

The person should "be provided with the opportunity to ­respond to the complaint in a co-operative, informal manner", and staff are required to treat the parties equally and to ensure they are ­notified and heard.

"In general this means that a (person who is the subject of a complaint) has the right to know of, and respond to, a complaint against him or her and a right to a fair and unbiased handling of the matter,'' the handbook says.

Under the heading "Possible early termination of a complaint", the handbook advises that in less serious cases the commission's staff should take additional steps to contact the accused person.

It says staff should recommend termination of a complaint if one of the grounds, such as a lack of substance, has been satisfied.

In the QUT case, three (White Australian) ­students — Calum Thwaites, Alex Wood and Jackson Powell — were accused by Ms Prior of racial hatred in a formal complaint to the commission in May 2014. But the commission failed for 14 months to tell them they were ­accused of a legal offence, racial vilification under section 18C. The students found out days before a compulsory conciliation conference in August last year.

Other documents released previously under FOI show that the commission had effectively excluded the students from correspondence and dealt instead with Ms Prior's legal team and QUT's staff and solicitors.

A file note by commission ­officer Ting Lim on July 28 last year states she advised the university's solicitor that QUT "has known about this complaint for over year ... it's not the fault of the commission that the QUT has waited a week before the (conciliation conference) to notify the students. If a student is notified and wants to attend next week, they will have to make time".

The students have described their alarm after eventually being told of the existence of the complaint shortly before the conciliation conference in Brisbane. They said they had no funds, no legal representation, and little time to prepare for the commission-run conference with Ms Prior and her legal team. When the conference failed to resolve the 18C complaint, Ms Prior's case went to the Federal Circuit Court as a damages claim for $250,000.

Mr Wood said he first became aware on July 31 last year of the complaint made 14 months earlier by Ms Prior when he read an email requiring him to attend the conference three days later on August 3.

The lawyers who have been acting for no fee for the students since early this year — Tony ­Morris QC and Michael Henry — accuse the commission of failing in its statutory duties and "recklessly" breaching the human rights of the students.

Commission president Gillian Triggs, who has rejected claims that the commission acted "disgracefully", has appointed Sydney barrister Angus Stewart SC to ­investigate the formal complaints filed by the students' lawyers.
Title: Re: Jewish Supremacists Lead Minorities Blocking Repeal of Hate Laws
Post by: Rev.Cambeul on Wed 31 Aug 2016
Jewish Supremacist Masquerading as a Journalist Tells Why WHITE AUSTRALIANS Must be Subject to the Arbitrary Rules of 18C/Hate Crime Law

http://www.theaustralian.com.au/opinion/free-speech-warriors-are-missing-the-point-about-18c/news-story/bbe10592eb3a73dfd9c5d870b524f302 (https://www.google.com.au/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=4&ved=0ahUKEwiboazk0ezOAhXGGJQKHaB2B-wQFggmMAM&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.theaustralian.com.au%2Fopinion%2Ffree-speech-warriors-are-missing-the-point-about-18c%2Fnews-story%2Fbbe10592eb3a73dfd9c5d870b524f302&usg=AFQjCNEOhZbRgwuGbd2zKL3l0-nCA4*A&sig2=czIk0B4MIVxBuxtCTH3I4g)

Quote from: Jewish Supremacist Colin RubensteinThe Australian (http://www.theaustralian.com.au/) | 1 September 2016

Extract: The positive accomplishments of the law in the small number of cases that involved a more substantive decision include: directing a webmaster remove from his site volumes of material alleging that Jewish people created a myth of Nazi genocide to achieve financial and other gains; halting a woman from distributing huge volumes of material alleging every social ill was due to Jewish malevolence; requiring an online newspaper to moderate comments accusing Aboriginal Australians in general of "criminal behaviour" following the deaths of some Aboriginal juvenile offenders; requesting an apology and future safeguards from a political party that had published in its newspaper vicious material alleging Jewish people were corrupt and pornographers; sanctioning a lawyer who, on entering a court building, refused to be searched, abusively screaming at the security guard that he was a "Singaporean prick" and not welcome in Australia; and helping an Aboriginal woman who was subject to a constant stream of public racial abuse from a neighbouring family.

{SNIP}

The fact is that 18C and 18D have formed a vital pillar of successful Australian multiculturalism, helping maintain social harmony and cohesion and minimise hatred and hostility between groups.

Colin Rubenstein is executive director of the Australia/Israel & Jewish Affairs Council. He taught politics at Monash University and was a member of the National Multicultural Advisory Council.
Title: Re: Jewish Supremacists Lead Minorities Blocking Repeal of Hate Laws
Post by: Rev.Cambeul on Sun 06 Nov 2016
Note: When contacted by Australian Creators, the Australian Human Rights Commission denied that it has any right to investigate complaints made by Creators, as the complaints were not related to denial of employment or otherwise job related issues, denial of service and refusal to obtain housing. However, the AHRC does investigate every tiddly little complaint by every money-hungry mud looking to profit at evil Whitey's expense. So understand that the AHRC is not a taxpayer funded government run body dedicated to equality - the AHRC is solely dedicated to the cultural genocide of White Australia.

@Cailen.

:rahowa

Time to drain 'human rights industry' swamp

Jennifer Oriel | The Australian (http://www.theaustralian.com.au/) | 7 November 2016

http://www.theaustralian.com.au/opinion/columnists/jennifer-oriel/time-to-drain-human-rights-industry-swamp/news-story/1debafb67eeb23437dfb17a8a5ff3ddc (https://www.google.com.au/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&ved=0ahUKEwiljYmAiZXQAhVGmZQKHQ67AXwQqQIIHTAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.theaustralian.com.au%2Fopinion%2Fcolumnists%2Fjennifer-oriel%2Ftime-to-drain-human-rights-industry-swamp%2Fnews-story%2F1debafb67eeb23437dfb17a8a5ff3ddc&usg=AFQjCNH4m36pLzDonl9LPNmT_pHZJlhOWg&sig2=k2zl4io_49lL08Ltg7G_9w)

Extract: With a national debt of $450 billion, a foreign debt over a trillion dollars and a bulging deficit, the Australian people cannot afford the vast system of activism swamping taxpayer-funded minority groups, media, academe and the law. To paraphrase Donald Trump, it's time to drain the swamp.

The AHRC is an activist organisation, the purpose of which has expired. It should have been retired after formal equality was introduced across Australian jurisdictions. The realisation of equality as a national condition is good for human rights, but bad for business. And human rights is a big, redundant business funded by taxpayers who are struggling to make ends meet. To justify their appalling waste of taxpayers' money, activists curate a culture of complaint in which citizens are grouped by state-designated "attributes" such as race or sex and encouraged to complain about perceived offence. Section 18C is the perfect tool to sow endless division and the culture of complaint that sustains the human rights industry.

The final reform needed is to replace current discrimination legislation with codified formal equality and reduce the protected attributes to people with disabilities, and primary carers for the disabled, the young and the elderly. We should support welfare for those genuinely in need and use it to assist fellow Australians find suitable employment. The AHRC and state discrimination commissions are fossils from an era where citizens were treated unequally before the law. Today, they promote new forms of inequality under the euphemism of affirmative action while silencing political dissidents under 18C. The AHRC has become a force for social discord and division. Let it go.
Title: Re: Jewish Supremacists Lead Minorities Blocking Repeal of Hate Laws
Post by: Rev.Cambeul on Fri 11 Nov 2016
The following article shows that no matter how liberal, how anti-racist you claim to be, when it comes down to it, you are WHITE and you are automatically guilty of anything and everything of which any darky, Semite or slant-eyes may accuse you.

Harden the f*ck up! Get active and fight back, or castrate and remove yourself from the gene pool - or better yet, hang yourself and get out of our way. We are at war and we do not intend to lose.

Aut Vincere Aut Mori
:rahowa

@Cailen.


Plight unmasks the injustice of 18C

Hedley Thomas | The Australian (http://www.theaustralian.com.au/) | 12 November 2016

http://www.theaustralian.com.au/news/nation/plight-unmasks-the-injustice-of-18c/news-story/c996e4c63d49a13b0a2cc0192bbb7eba (https://www.google.com.au/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&ved=0ahUKEwiL9LDO3qHQAhXGI5QKHUTFCekQqQIIHDAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.theaustralian.com.au%2Fnews%2Fnation%2Fplight-unmasks-the-injustice-of-18c%2Fnews-story%2Fc996e4c63d49a13b0a2cc0192bbb7eba&usg=AFQjCNFz1EYHbWZ6qBEVe9frPrvZcVT-KQ&sig2=8BYTnGQbUxDt0GQ_xhtECw)

Kyran Findlater made an alarming discovery when he checked his LinkedIn page one day in November last year.

The married Brisbane man, 26, a robotics engineer and graduate of the Queensland University of Technology, had been working in Canada since December, 2014. He had not heard of Cindy Prior.

He knew nothing of a racial vilification case Prior had brought against him and six other QUT students under section 18C of the Racial Discrimination Act over their Facebook posts in late May 2013.

Until now, Findlater, a quietlyspoken young professional with no interest in, or history of, political activism, did not want to speak publicly about any of these facts. He feared the smear of racism, and damage to his reputation, budding career in Canada and family.

He is sharing his story with The Weekend Australian because he is distressed at the idea he could be seen as a racist by those who do not know the facts. He believes Australians need to understand how innocent people are being harmed by misuse of what he regards as a bad law, section 18C of the Racial Discrimination Act, administered by an incompetent handler, the Human Rights Commission.

"The fact that myself and the other students were even dragged into the litigation against QUT is a disgrace to the legal system in Australia,'' Findlater said from his home in a small town in Canada's British Columbia.

The LinkedIn message he got last November 13 came from Prior's Brisbane solicitor, Susan Moriarty, who conveyed news that stunned him: Findlater was, the solicitor explained, being sued in the Federal Circuit Court for Prior's "psychiatric injury and economic loss linked to racial vilification posts you uploaded to QUT Stalkerspace (Facebook page)" in May 2013.

But there was a way out. Moriarty, winner of the 2015 Australian Employment Discrimination Lawyer Award from Corp INTO Magazine, added: "Our client is prepared to discontinue her complaint of racial vilification against you and agree to confidentiality in consideration of your payment to her of the sum of $5000. If we do not receive your response to this offer on or before 25 November, 2015, we shall assume that you do not wish to settle, and continue proceedings against you."

Findlater recalls that he was confused and deeply concerned. He went back and read what he had written on Facebook in late May 2013 after another student, Alex Wood, had posted about being ejected from QUT's indigenous-only computer lab ­because of the colour of his skin.

Wood and his friends — who had visited QUT's unsigned computer lab, called the Oodgeroo Unit, to access its unused computers for study — are white. They did not know that made the lab off-limits to them. Prior, who worked there in an administrative role, is indigenous. She asked their race and told them to leave because of their non-Aboriginality.

Findlater says he cannot stand racism. He believes that race-based barriers sow division, and that universities should promote cohesion, not segregation, among students, many of whom he ­believes will impart those values as role models and leaders in their professional lives.

Findlater's Facebook post that offended Prior, after her ejection of Wood, an engineering student, on May 28, 2013, stated: "My Student and Amenity fees are going to furbish rooms in the university where inequality reigns supreme? I believe if we have to pay to support these sorts of places, there should at least be more created for general purpose use, but again, how do these sorts of facilities support interaction­ and community within QUT? All this does is ­encourage separation and ­inequality."

The post made Findlater a ­defendant, along with six other students, in Prior's Federal Circuit Court proceedings in November last year with a claim for $250,000 in damages.

What Findlater did not know when he checked his LinkedIn and saw Moriarty's "urgent" message was that the racial hatred claims levelled against him were not new — in fact, they had been in Prior's formal written complaint, naming him, to the Human Rights Commission since May 2014.

For reasons including natural justice, the commission is required to tell people when they are ­accused of racial hatred. This is to help them clarify the circumstances or deny they said something racially abhorrent or explain the context. The commission's president, Gillian Triggs, has claimed this week in interviews that the taxpayer-funded body and its staff had been working with the QUT students "in good faith" to try to resolve the complaint for some 14 months after it was lodged by Prior. But the commission's own records show that claim by Triggs is false.

Most of the seven students found out for the first time in late July 2014 of the existence of the complaint. They were given just three business days' notice to ­attend a conciliation conference in Brisbane. But nobody — not the human rights body, nor QUT, nor Prior — had ever successfully alerted Findlater.

QUT confirmed yesterday, after doing checks following The Weekend Australian's questions, that a letter it sent by registered post on July 28, 2015, to alert him did not reach Findlater and the email it sent on the same day had not been opened, possibly because it went to an old email address.

Findlater said the first he knew was when he saw the LinkedIn message, three months after the failure of the commission's August 3 conciliation conference in which he was a named party. Documents show the commission had decided by late August that there was "no reasonable prospect of the matter being settled by conciliation", ­resulting in it being escalated to court.

How, Findlater asks, can the commission be serious about "conciliation" when it does not once tell him there is a complaint? How, he questions, did it decide conciliation would not be possible when he did not know about it?

Back in November last year, when he saw the LinkedIn message, Findlater did not know that a growing number of people — solicitors for Prior, commission staff and Triggs, QUT staff and their vice-chancellor Peter Coaldrake — had known since late May the previous year that he was one of the seven at the heart of an 18C ­racial hatred complaint of which he was unaware.

Findlater had even joined the staff of QUT in its robotics lab. He was an employee at the same time the university knew of the 18C complaint against him; he was easy to find and contact. Yet he was not told. He is appalled at the commission's conduct and deeply disappointed with the university.

In his reply to Moriarty last November, he wrote: "Firstly, I do not wish to settle on this matter. I have reviewed my involvement in the social media posts in which I have allegedly racially vilified your client (or anyone else for that matter) and I feel that the defamatory allegations against me cannot be substantiated."

Having decided to stand on principle and reject the invitation to pay money, Findlater prepared for the next stage — the court proceedings, and a December 7 date for the case to be mentioned in an open hearing.

"I was in Canada and I had one month to scramble and find a ­lawyer,'' Findlater says.

"If I had known there was a conciliation meeting months earlier with the Human Rights Commission, I could have gone and tried to explain to Ms Prior that I was sorry her feelings were hurt and that I'm not a bastard. I could have attended some form of conciliation and tried to have it ­resolved and concluded so that there would have been no court proceedings. But I was never given that ­option. I was never contacted about it by QUT or by the ­commission. It is very disturbing to be named before a court as a human rights violator. This is not who I am."

He spent money on legal ­advice from a Queensland solicitor, who wrote to Moriarty with a proposal that both sides walk away with no payment.

Moriarty replied to Findlater's solicitor on December 14: "Our ­client did nothing wrong on 28 or 29 May 2013 but the posts, in which your client was a voluntary and enthusiastic participant, have contributed to the ending of her career with the Queensland University of Technology. The timing of your client's posts ties him to the debate which emerged on QUT Stalkerspace following (another student's) post on 28 May 2013 challenging the ethics and ­legality of study rooms for indigenous persons at the University.

"By our reading of your client's contributions, your client's posts were popular. As is the case, for every comment that went up in response/reply to his post he would have received an email each time and he also would have received an email of every 'like' that went up also. We note there were ten (10) 'likes' in relation to one of your client's posts. He will be expected to discover those responses as part of his List of Documents.

"It is also the case that the decided law merely requires our client to prove her identification with and membership of a race of people subjected to an act or course of conduct the law regards as vilification and discrimination on the basis of 'race'. Our client will compromise her claim and agree to a Deed of Release incorporating the normal terms of ­indemnity, confidentiality and non-derogation in consideration of a payment to her of $5,000.00. The Offer is open for fourteen days from today's date."

Findlater and his family worried about this over the Christmas break. They believed it was grossly unfair. There was more legal correspondence between his solicitor and Moriarty, resulting in him incurring legal fees of about $10,000. He knew he was not a racist. But he could not afford to run a financially-crippling legal defence.

In early January, during a visit to his family in Brisbane, Findlater decided to call it quits. He and his wife were worrying a lot. The stress was not worth it.

He wrote to Ms Moriarty with an offer to settle, to limit the costs and end the concerns he and his wife held about the case. He ­explained in his offer letter that he had significant debts from his ­engineering degree at QUT, and other bills in Canada from his relocation there.

He asked if, instead of $5000, he could pay $3500, which he would need to borrow. He wrote that he was making the offer "in the hope that I can avoid the ­expense of time and money during the proceedings and in the hope that your client will gain something in the process".

His offer was rejected in a letter from Ms Moriarty who replied that her client, Prior, "advises that her review of your Facebook and LinkedIn profile establishes that you have been a well-paid employee since graduating as an ­engineer from QUT.

Her research demonstrates that your wife too has a degree. While you may have some financial difficulties, as you allege, there is nothing to indicate that those difficulties are anything but temporary".

Moriarty set a deadline of late February for full payment of the $5000; Findlater paid.

"My reasoning for taking the settlement offer was to avoid a protracted legal process where I could not be present to defend my name,'' he says.

"I feel that I did the right thing at the time because it was the safest route, and many people agreed with me at the time that I should settle but there is the whole injustice of it. If I was living in Australia I would not have paid, I would have fought it with the other ­students.

"Sure, my quote was the face of reason, but now when I Google my name, my positive achievements in life have been sullied, perhaps permanently, by the media coverage and headlines now associated with my name."

On issues of race and segregation, Findlater says: "I really think that all Australians should be given equal opportunities. Why should it matter what their race is? By segregating people with facilities like the computer lab, we are telling them they are disadvantaged, we are reinforcing it. It's divisive and unfair to them."

From Canada, he has been closely following The Australian's reporting of the case since February. He cheered the dismissal of the proceedings against three of the students — Wood, Calum Thwaites and Jackson Powell — by judge Michael Jarrett earlier this month.

He was surprised that Triggs claimed publicly that the commission "investigated" the case and engaged with students.

He has been buoyed by the public support and the growing calls to change 18C and investigate the commission's handling of the cases.

He has always been reluctant to speak out but he changed his mind to ensure that the facts in his case were on the public record and well-understood, so that strangers knew, as his family and friends knew, that he did nothing wrong, and should not have been put through the worrying and costly process.

"I am glad about the possibility of review and amendment of 18C to avoid people being dragged through the mud like this again is comforting to me," he says.

"I feel like I was unfairly targeted. I am frustrated that the lady was able to take me to court over what was, in my opinion, something very harmless. But that's the problem with 18C — it allows this to happen over opinions and free speech. None of the things I posted were racist or vilifying of anyone. I feel let down by the legal system and frustrated that nobody told me until it was too late. I got sucked into this legal vortex and I felt helpless to do anything. It cost me a lot of money that I will probably not see again. It's not good that I was part of it. If I Google myself, it pops up.

"I blame the Human Rights Commission and QUT for not telling me. It compromised the chance for the complaint to go away. There was no conciliation.

"I am surprised by the audacity of Professor Triggs in saying that the commission did all these things for the students. It is a terrible performance for someone in a highly paid position. If the commission had done its job in the first place I would not be in this ­situation."




Note: Do take the time to read the comments at the bottom of the original article. They show that people are beginning to wake up to the hypocrisy ... but as yet, they are not prepared to fight tooth and nail. They don't yet understand that it is their lives and the future of their children, their culture and their civilisation that are at stake. #WhiteGeNOcide

http://www.theaustralian.com.au/news/nation/plight-unmasks-the-injustice-of-18c/news-story/c996e4c63d49a13b0a2cc0192bbb7eba (https://www.google.com.au/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&ved=0ahUKEwiL9LDO3qHQAhXGI5QKHUTFCekQqQIIHDAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.theaustralian.com.au%2Fnews%2Fnation%2Fplight-unmasks-the-injustice-of-18c%2Fnews-story%2Fc996e4c63d49a13b0a2cc0192bbb7eba&usg=AFQjCNFz1EYHbWZ6qBEVe9frPrvZcVT-KQ&sig2=8BYTnGQbUxDt0GQ_xhtECw)

"We must secure the existence of our people and a future for White children."
Title: Re: Jewish Supremacists Lead Minorities Blocking Repeal of Hate Laws
Post by: Rev.Cambeul on Sun 13 Nov 2016
An ABC TV presenter claims that we need 18C to stop White people from saying things that will get them attacked by violent, out of control Aboriginal mobs.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XrvNwIhlDwU&ab_channel=JillJacks

Just in case you the viewer is dumb enough to still think that so-called minorities need legal protection from the unthinkingly offensive White majority, and that minority violence is justified by White Racism, then it is you that is as much to blame for the violence against Whites as those that perpetrate it.

In Australia, refusal by a White person to give a cigarette to an Indigenous person when they demand it is considered justification for violence. If the police get involved, they will always accept the accusation that the victim is a "F*cking White dog!" A "Racist White c*nt!" "He/she called me a coon/nigger/black c*nt." The White victim is quietly shipped off to hospital and the Aboriginal criminal is free to go. (So it's been for decades, now add the Africoon to the mix who gets the same Black Privileges.)

Of course, if the White victim fights back and wins or at least drives off his attacker, the police will charge him with any number of criminal offences, from riot and affray to assault and hate-crimes.

Furthermore, this type of violent interaction (often with police intervention as described above) is not limited to Indigenous Australians vs White Australians. With decades of government multicultural policies in place, White Australians have to contend with the same bullsh*t from every self-entitled minority that finds its way Downunder.

So, to all the White Marxists and anti-Racist Libtards out there, next time you justify Black on White violence just remember, when we come for you, it wont be to pinch your smokes and give you a smack on the jaw. When we come for you, it'll be with rope in hand ready to hang you from the nearest tree. We are White Racial Loyalists: We will ship those niggers back, but we hang race-traitors.

:rahowa

@Cailen.
Title: Re: Jewish Supremacists Lead Minorities Blocking Repeal of Hate Laws
Post by: Rev.Cambeul on Mon 21 Nov 2016
https://twitter.com/CailenCambeul/status/800814298045956102

Quote from: Arrogant Bitch on MSM"This is the right for people to be protected from being harassed, bullied because of their race, because of their sex," she said.

"That's what 18C is there for. It's to protect those who are vulnerable. It's not just the Aboriginal community. It's the Jewish community. The refugee community. It is women, people who are trans, people of different sexes. We need to stop talking about it being free speech. It's protecting the marginalised. It's for equality and protection."

Marginalise: To treat (a person, group, or concept) as insignificant or peripheral.

The thoughts, the beliefs, the very culture, the historical and future significance of White people in their own countries have not only been marginalised, but are vilified daily on the streets and in people's homes via the mouthpiece of MSM. Section 18C and other Hate-Crime laws across the world are not about the promotion of equality. Hate-Crime laws are the promotion of the supremacy of one race, gender, religion or personal PC choice over another - and ultimately, it's always WHITEY that's to blame for everything.

Keep it up libtards; the White Man is waking up. The Day of the Rope is coming ....

@Cailen.
Title: Re: Jewish Supremacists Lead Minorities Blocking Repeal of Hate Laws
Post by: Rev.Cambeul on Thu 29 Dec 2016
And the Jewish Supremacists rise ...

Quote from: MSMSubmissions from community groups to the inquiry, which the Prime Minister ordered to examine the law and the role of the Australian Human Rights Commission, show a backlash against reform that mirrors a campaign more than two years ago when Mr Abbott, as prime minister, promised to revoke 18C but was ultimately forced to abandon the controversial plan.

The Executive Council of Australian Jewry claims in its submission that any amendment to 18C would send "a strong and dangerous message from Australia's political leaders that a degree of racism in public discourse is to be considered acceptable".

The Chinese Australian Forum predicts any change "may well see the Coalition government lose power and seats in the coming elections", singling out the multicultural Sydney seats of Reid, Bennelong and Banks.

Source: http://www.theaustralian.com.au/national-affairs/malcolm-turnbull-faces-section-18c-test-amid-ethnic-opposition/news-story/dacbbe824735cde032905b90918fd35f?nk=5210ea90b0ec71d2453bb016f53292c9-1483005747 (https://www.google.com.au/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&ved=0ahUKEwj83PeejpnRAhVLlZQKHTbKCqgQqQIIHTAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.theaustralian.com.au%2Fnational-affairs%2Fmalcolm-turnbull-faces-section-18c-test-amid-ethnic-opposition%2Fnews-story%2Fdacbbe824735cde032905b90918fd35f&usg=AFQjCNFW9Isu-YurFFbElwLtDhVBjEdBLg&sig2=sI3ZEDisYSKm5vdYvqA7Mw)

Be sure to read the comments on the article page above. They are probably the best I've ever seen from Australians. Finally proof that the average people are waking up and beginning to get active, instead of their typical pull yer head in ... she'll be right mate ... I like chinky takeaway drivel.

@Cailen.

More: https://creativityalliance.com/australias-new-prime-minister-malcolm-turnbull-more-jew-than-any-hebe

(https://creativityalliance.com/23/malcolmturnbull1-hebe-300x275-300x275.jpg)
Malcolm Turnbull: Definitely not my Prime Minister ....
Title: Re: Jewish Supremacists Lead Minorities Blocking Repeal of Hate Laws
Post by: Rev.Cambeul on Fri 03 Mar 2017
Quote from: Andrew Hastie, Australian Liberal PartyI rise today also to speak about the Parliamentary Joint Committee on Human Rights and its report on the freedom of speech in Australia, particularly as it pertains to section 18C of the Racial Discrimination Act.

I note that this is a fraught issue, with many stakeholders and with many submissions, and I acknowledge the diversity of opinion. I think that is a very good thing; it reflects a healthy Australian society. The fact that we are having this debate here is also an indicator that we have a healthy, functioning democracy.

There are a number of things that I want to say up-front, because those opposite have misconstrued many of our positions with words like 'divisive' and 'hysteria'. I want to make it very clear where I stand, so I want to lift the bonnet a bit on my thinking before I get to 18C itself. I am not a libertarian, but I am a Liberal, which is to say that I am committed to freedom: freedom of conscience, freedom of speech, freedom of religion, freedom of association, freedom of enterprise and a whole host of freedoms that we hold dear in this country. Of course, today we are talking about freedom of speech.

I am going to quote John Donne and, at risk of sounding terribly heteronormative, I am going to use the original words of his poem:

No man is an island, entire of itself; every man is a piece of the continent, a part of the main.

Freedom only makes sense in the context of community. We do not live in isolation from each other in this country. We have constant exchange with our neighbours. We have a mutual dependence upon each other, which is why we come together to form local, state and federal governments. That reflects our search for order and our desire to secure our collective freedoms. Government is especially important when we come together to do tasks that we cannot do ourselves, especially in emergencies. So I just want to make clear that I am not a libertarian; I am a Liberal, and I believe in limited government, in the separation of powers and in the diffusion of power. That is why our Westminster system, I think, is the best system of government in the world, and I am proud that Australia has that as our system of government.

But alongside those freedoms and rights come responsibilities. As I said, we have a mutual dependence upon each other. At the heart of our democracy is the volunteer spirit. In an ideal world, every Australian would self-regulate or self-govern, but of course that is not true. But it does raise the question: what role does government have in our lives? Is it the supporting act or is it the main protagonist? I am of the view that it is the supporting act, and my point about 18C is that it ultimately is symbolic of government overreach. It is government overreach interfering in the lives of individual Australians and regulating one of our most basic freedoms, which is freedom of speech.

I also want to be very clear on my anthropology, my view of humankind. I believe that all people are endowed with respect and inherent worth and dignity, whatever their race, ethnicity, colour, religion, sex or sexuality. It does not matter: everyone is deserving of respect, because we are all endowed with inherent worth. I want to state that upfront very clearly. I also believe that a healthy civic society means that government can step back out of our lives. We call these mediating institutions or prepolitical institutions, and every single electorate has them. We start with the family and we work outwards to clubs—sporting clubs, Rotary clubs, Surf Life Saving clubs—churches, temples, mosques, schools and charities—you name it. They are in every single electorate around this country, and I believe they should be the first line of defence against discriminatory speech. They should be the first line of defence. I would rather see them empowered than big government interfering in people's lives, which I think is what has been the case with the exercise of 18C. Of course, in my electorate, and I am sure around the country, people have disengaged from civic society, so this is a task that all Australians should be engaged in: to rebuild a strong civic society.

Back to the topic of the Racial Discrimination Act and 18C. This is part of the question: what sort of a society do we want? Do we want one regulated by the state, or do we want one regulated by the citizenry? Do we want the state as the main protagonist or the supporting act? I think we have seen with the QUT case and the Bill Leak case that 18C has allowed vexatious litigation to creep into our society, where people are being inhibited in the exercise of their freedom of speech. We are seeing creeping political correctness across the board. We are seeing it in universities and schools. Not every Australian fully understands what 18C means, but for a lot of people it is emblematic of that creeping state interference and political correctness.

George Orwell wrote a famous essay, 'Politics and the English language', and in that he argued that language and thought are intimately related, so if we are to truly exercise freedom of conscience we need to have the freedom to exercise our speech as well. Of course, 'If thought corrupts language, language can also corrupt thought,' as he famously made clear. If we have the state regulating our speech, you also have the state regulating our thought, and I think that looks a lot like 1984, another great book by George Orwell.

The cases that have been litigated under 18C have caused a lot of psychological stress and trauma to those involved and also significant financial cost. I think of Bill Leak. You may not like Bill Leak's cartoons, and that is fine. I find them funny. I have found some of his cartoons to be very risque and found that they push the boundaries, but that is who he is. I want to acknowledge that after the 'Je suis Charlie'attacks in January 2015 he had the courage to do a cartoon in which he illustrated the Prophet Mohammed. Whatever you may think of that, he showed significant courage. He had to relocate his home because of death threats to him on the internet. I find it rather ironic in a free society that when he published a cartoon—whatever you might think of that cartoon—he was then pursued under 18C for that cartoon. What the terrorists themselves could not achieve in a free society, we had a mechanism of government for, which was used to pursue him for another cartoon of his. I think that is just unacceptable.

I turn to the report itself and recommendation 1. I approve of recommendation 1, which recommends addressing racism in Australian society. Absolutely we need to address racism. We need to address racism in all the mediating institutions that I just mentioned. Recommendation 2 says:

Recognising the profound impacts of serious forms of racism, the committee recommends that leaders of the Australian community and politicians exercise their freedom of speech to identify and condemn racially hateful and discriminatory speech where it occurs in public.

I affirm that absolutely. In fact, I copped a flogging on Facebook a couple of weeks ago after Larry Pickering's comments at the Q Society. I condemned his remarks. I condemned him for what he said about gay people and I condemned him for what he said about Islamic State and their barbarous acts in Iraq and Syria. A lot of people said I overstepped the mark. Great! I am happy for that. I enjoyed the flogging, in a sense, because it was another healthy indicator that democracy is alive and well and everyone can have their point of view.

I now turn to recommendation 3, and specifically to where it says:

(c) removing the words 'offend', 'insult' and 'humiliate' from section 18C and replacing them with 'harass'; I think we need to do that. My colleague Senator James Paterson last night said that in this parliament we have a unique opportunity, a pathway where we have consensus around some of these recommendations. I recognise that this parliament is a tough one. It is rather austere from a legislative point of view. It is difficult to get legislation through. But I think we can all agree, on the evidence, that the QUT case, the Bill Leak case and others are a step too far. We absolutely need to reform the legislation. Politics is the art of the possible. I would rather not have 18C at all. I know that is not going to be achieved, but I do think we need to make changes. We need to make the threshold much higher to avoid the vexatious litigation that we have seen.

Ultimately, as I said, I am a Liberal, so I am going to err on the side of individual liberty. I hope that my fellow Australians are committed to a united country that is not divisive; that can preserve freedom and also ensure that the responsibilities of individual citizens are enforced and met. Section 18C has a chilling effect and we need reform. That is why I endorse it.

http://www.aph.gov.au/Parliamentary_Business/Committees/Joint/Human_Rights_inquiries/FreedomspeechAustralia/Report

Effectively, he wants us dead ... but he wants his Liberal voters to have free speech ... but if they go to far, he wants them killed too.

That's Liberal in Australia, Republican in America and CONservative in the UK. What's the diff? Absolutely none.

Obey Bibi and keep your thoughts in check.
Title: Re: Jewish Supremacists Lead Minorities Blocking Repeal of Hate Laws
Post by: Rev.Cambeul on Mon 06 Mar 2017
Jewish Supremacist Demands Attempts to Remove or Alter 18c Halted

According to Colin Rubenstein, executive director of the Australia/Israel & Jewish Affairs Council, persecuting White Australians (and only White Australians) in order to please often violent, typically abusive minority groups has been working perfectly well for a couple of decades now, and that's the way it should remain.

Source: http://www.smh.com.au/comment/the-fight-over-section-18c-and-18d-should-be-put-to-bed-20170305-guqxoh.html

Quote from: Jewish Supremacist, Colin RubensteinSections 18C and 18D have formed a vital pillar of successful Australian multiculturalism, helping to maintain social harmony and minimise hatred and hostility between different groups. Since their inclusion in 1995, organisations monitoring racism have witnessed both more circumspection and less harm by openly racist groups in Australia. This has clearly benefited the wellbeing of minority groups in Australian, including the Jewish community, as well as social cohesion as a whole.

Important precedents have been set against Holocaust denial and other manifestations of racism. For example, statistics maintained by the Jewish community show there was a substantial decline in incidents of anti-Jewish harassment in Tasmania and South Australia following judgements in Jones v Scully and Jones v Toben respectively, which were prosecuted under Section 18C.

Topic: The #Holocaust (((HoloHOAX)))
https://creativityalliance.com/forum/index.php/topic,2625.0.html

Topic: Jews Have Dr Frederick Toben Sentenced to Three Months Prison
https://creativityalliance.com/forum/index.php/topic,1632.0.html

Under 18c, just referring to a Jewish person as a Jewish Supremacist is a crime, but for him or any other non-White to intentionally insult, offend and humiliate a White Australian is a matter of his or their right to free speech. That is, free speech that White Australians no longer possess and will never be allowed to regain.

Remember that as you're dragged away to the gulag for unintentionally offending the protected species of this nation.

@Cailen.
Title: Re: Jewish Supremacists Lead Minorities Blocking Repeal of Hate Laws
Post by: Br.IanVonTurpie on Mon 06 Mar 2017
So who cares about free speech and your rights to civil liberty ?If the Jews get their own way your rights don't count at all!Don't complain about multiculturalism or white genocide! Shut up and be happy, do what ZOG wants and be a good goy!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=apQQAYJZKLc
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cnSUT6aCNBg
Title: Re: Jewish Supremacists Lead Minorities Blocking Repeal of Hate Laws
Post by: Br.IanVonTurpie on Tue 07 Mar 2017
Malcolm Turnbull is being offered a bold reform on race-hate laws that promises to end a damaging Coalition impasse over restrictions on free speech, raising the bar for complaints about language that "insults" or "offends" people on the basis of race.

http://www.theaustralian.com.au/national-affairs/compromise-plan-18c-reform-plan-hinges-on-pub-test/news-story/f5158d34e02ab2725af080a12cef2ca7 (https://www.google.com.au/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=0ahUKEwiCr_ac38PSAhUEGJQKHW1tA-EQqOcBCBswAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.theaustralian.com.au%2Fnational-affairs%2Fcompromise-plan-18c-reform-plan-hinges-on-pub-test%2Fnews-story%2Ff5158d34e02ab2725af080a12cef2ca7&usg=AFQjCNFUVAHQt87jkSw7EnRXQfM2MTrqhQ&sig2=-yk1NWFKOc7nUqO1iqPXNA)

The breakthrough proposal puts "ordinary Australians" at the heart of a tough new test for legal action under section 18C of the Racial Discrimination Act, clearing the ground for talks in federal cabinet about the push to amend the law.

In a new effort to build a consensus for change, the Prime Minister has been approached to back the compromise, in order to quash threats to free speech while acting on community calls to retain strong sanctions against racism.

The plan seeks to insert a "reasonable person" test into the law so that applicants will have to prove the offensive behaviour breaches the standards of ordinary Australians — not just the feelings of a narrow group.

International Development Minister Concetta Fierravanti-Wells, a conservative whose parents migrated to Australia from Italy, has canvassed the proposal with her colleagues as a way to bring the law into line with everyday community standards.

18c debate gives PM free kick18c debate gives PM free kick
"It raises the threshold for determining what constitutes offensive behaviour based on racial hatred: to offend, insult, humiliate or intimidate," Senator Fierravanti-Wells writes in The Australian today.

"The test would be what ordinary Australians think those should be. I believe by adding this test we can obviate much of the negativity we are seeing at the moment and deliver the appropriate balance between freedom of speech and freedom from racial vilification.

"The 'reasonable Australian' test is a far higher threshold for social debate. It has been an essential part of the values that we hold dear to have great resilience and racial tolerance. We do not accept racist and xenophobic speech and we also value freedom of expression, religion and belief."

The plan builds on the findings of a joint parliamentary committee that last week agreed to overhaul the Australian Human Rights Commission to weed out vexatious complaints but failed to reach common ground on reforming section 18C itself.

The Australian has been told Mr Turnbull and senior cabinet ministers are preparing to act swiftly on the report in order to force the commission to speed up its decisions, throw out vexatious complaints and prevent the law being used to threaten free speech.

Coalition MPs are struggling to agree on the best path to change the law after growing concern at the drawn-out complaints against three Queensland University of Technology students over their Facebook posts and a more recent case against The Australian's cartoonist Bill Leak.

Commission president Gillian Triggs is under fire for letting complaints drag on, with critics warning that "the process becomes the punishment" as defendants must spend thousands of dollars to argue cases at the commission that later go to court.

In the latest dispute, Professor Triggs faces a likely recall by Liberal senators to explain "misleading" evidence she gave about Leak's case last week, when she said neither the cartoonist nor the publisher "made any submission" justifying why the complaint should be dismissed under 18D of the law, which provides an exemption for the media and academia. Leak's lawyer, Justin Quill, has produced a letter sent to the commission last October that explicitly cited section 18D as grounds for dismissing the complaint over the cartoonist's portrayal of an Aboriginal police officer handing over a boy to his beer-drinking father who has forgotten his son's name.

Last week's report into the racial hatred laws highlighted the divisions within the Coalition by outlining six options for section 18C, ranging from no change to replacing the words "offend" and "insult" and "humiliate" with the word "harass" instead.

The committee also canvassed changing the objective test from a "reasonable member of the relevant group" to a "reasonable member of the Australian community".

Victorian Liberal senator James Paterson is backing the new offence of "harass" in order to restrict complaints but fellow committee member and NSW Liberal MP Julian Leeser is opposing change to section 18C on the grounds that changes to the commission's process would be enough to prevent a repeat of the QUT or Leak cases.

One Liberal who opposes change to 18C told The Australian that the "reasonable person" test would still provide fertile ground for Labor and community groups to campaign against the Coalition with the claim they were making it easier for racists to speak out.

"But of all the options it is the least bad," he said.

Another Liberal who wants sweeping change to section 18C said the compromise would not go far enough for those who wanted to dismantle the limits on free speech.

The debate is expected to go to federal cabinet before being put to the full Coalition party room to decide whether to change the law.



Well I'm sure you would be a "reasonable person" and joke about other people's cultural differences in a pub setting and avoid prison time just as long as you don't touch the Jews and their holocaust and the fact they commit genocide on Palestinians. So, are they going to tell us how they define "reasonable people?"
Title: Re: Jewish Supremacists Lead Minorities Blocking Repeal of Hate Laws
Post by: Rev.Cambeul on Tue 07 Mar 2017
Quote from: Br.IanVonTurpie on Tue 07 Mar 2017Are they going to tell us how they define "reasonable people?"

Reasonable people by today's definition are people that go to university. What your government and mainstream media consider to be people from all walks of life. That's an opinion that covers all mainstream political parties, it is the only opinion that you will find in mainstream media, and according to surveys done by universities on uni students at uni bars, the statistics prove that as an undeniable fact.

So, if you do deny any of those facts, you obviously stand opposed reasonable people and will be subject to persecution under Australia's Hate Crime Laws ... got it, Ya White dog?

Remember, giving White People freedom of speech is considered a racist act - and only White People can be racist say those that glorify in the death of the White Race.

Would you pass the racism test? How the law defines discrimination
http://www.news.com.au/national/courts-law/would-you-pass-the-racism-test-how-the-law-defines-discrimination/news-story/0dd8bd83ba89083637fe599ff32b0b29
Description: Blacks and Asians vilified by evil Whitey ... there is no example of vilification of White People to be seen.

@Cailen.
Title: Re: Jewish Supremacists Lead Minorities Blocking Repeal of Hate Laws
Post by: Br.IanVonTurpie on Tue 07 Mar 2017
A university student could be studying anything from a trade, to Law, to Dentistry, to Philosophy, to Visual art.

You'd think a person who has served Australia in the ADF may be considered "a reasonable person" too? Or ... perhaps not ... if he rides a motorbike and has a few tattoos, perhaps some clothes with "rough looking" paraphernalia on them. Perhaps it is reasonable to say he is a member of prohibited organisation then? He must be a "roughian"?!

I wonder if it is "reasonable" to lump a member of a Christian bike club in with these unreasonable roughians who don't follow the good book?



Title: Re: Jewish Supremacists Lead Minorities Blocking Repeal of Hate Laws
Post by: Rev.Cambeul on Wed 08 Mar 2017
Quote from: Br.IanVonTurpie on Tue 07 Mar 2017A university student could be studying anything from a trade, to Law, to Dentistry, to Philosophy, to Visual art.

Any university student that drinks at the uni bar or goes to watch bands at the uni bar is part of the university social life. And to be part of the university social life, you have to be a total, leftard nut-job.

Anything less than the open declaration that all White People Have to Die, will have them outed as Nazis ... and if not expelled by popular demand from the reasonable people at the university (that's students and lecturers), they will ultimately fail whatever course is their chosen pursuit, and be forced to return to a lifetime of cleaning the chicken sh*t from the deep-fryer at Kentucky Fried Chicken.

Quote from: Br.IanVonTurpie on Tue 07 Mar 2017You'd think a person who has served Australia in the ADF may be considered "a reasonable person" too? Or ... perhaps not ...

As a former soldier, I can say definitely not. As a former soldier, society treats me as a baby killing, racist, paid serial killer, preying on innocent women, children, homosexuals and immigrants. I am a threat to the government and democracy, and police fear gatherings of soldiers in any civilian context. Due to the nature of the military command structure, I am trained to be a so-called fascist, by so-called fascists. Little wonder that so many ex soldiers raise the middle finger to so-called respectable people and gravitate towards the outer edges of respectable society, joining motorcycle clubs and becoming active as White Racial Loyalists.

On the other hand - at least on the surface - these days, soldiers appear to be treated better than ever since Vietnam, but when you get right down to the grimy, sweaty balls of it, soldiers - especially former soldiers are treated as the scum of the earth by just about everyone.

Quote from: Br.IanVonTurpie on Tue 07 Mar 2017wonder if it is "reasonable" to lump a member of a Christian bike club in with these unreasonable roughians who don't follow the good book?

Your democratic government, police and mainstream media certainly think that it's reasonable to lump all who appear to fit a certain archetype that is White, Male and Masculine in together as unreasonable, rebellious roughians. Even your average MSM consuming idiot is so bogged up by the constant stream of swill that they swallow, that even though they fit the very same demographic, they love to sit in accusation, categorising their peers by an archetype which they are force fed to hate, but still unknowingly abide by. So, by that definition alone, any proclaimed Pub Test would have to take place in a controlled environment, away from any genuinely average White Australian Male. Hence, the Pub Test will take place in university bars across the country to the toilet-gurgling strains of Propagandhi (http://propagandhi.com).

@Cailen.
Title: Re: Jewish Supremacists Lead Minorities Blocking Repeal of Hate Laws
Post by: Rev.Cambeul on Tue 21 Mar 2017
Australia's gutless, self-proclaimed Jewish turd of a prime minister, Malcolm Turnbull, has struck a compromise deal for changes to section 18C of the ­Racial Discrimination Act that is expected to retain the offences of humiliate and intimidate on the grounds of race, but abolish ­"insult" and "offend" in favour of what is claimed to be a new higher test of "harass".

The Old:
QuoteRACIAL DISCRIMINATION ACT 1975 - SECT 18C

Offensive behaviour because of race, colour or national or ethnic origin
             (1)  It is unlawful for a person to do an act, otherwise than in private, if:

                     (a)  the act is reasonably likely, in all the circumstances, to offend, insult, humiliate or intimidate another person or a group of people; and

                     (b)  the act is done because of the race, colour or national or ethnic origin of the other person or of some or all of the people in the group.

The New:
QuoteRACIAL DISCRIMINATION ACT 1975 - SECT 18C

Offensive behaviour because of race, colour or national or ethnic origin
             (1)  It is unlawful for a person to do an act, otherwise than in private, if:

                     (a)  the act is reasonably likely, in all the circumstances, to harass, humiliate or intimidate another person or a group of people; and

                     (b)  the act is done because of the race, colour or national or ethnic origin of the other person or of some or all of the people in the group.

According to every Muslim, Palestinian, Afghani, Leb or whatever that I've ever had a problem with in life, due to the nature of my being a White Man who will not get down on my knees and beg forgiveness for the sins of my race, I have been accused of harassing them, attempting to humiliate and intimidate them ... All because I said No to their lousy demands; because I refuse to run when ordered out; because I exist and I fight until I win. That alone is enough for those who's task it is to enact and pursue the laws of the land to declare me a White Supremacist and absolve me any right to exist.

Put simply, they hate White people and they want us, they want you and your children dead.

Changes in the semantics of a law does not alter a law. Nor does it alter how the law is pursued by those with a political and racial agenda to protect so-called minorities while punishing the White (so-called) majority for merely being White. And yet, this is enough that it will keep the libtards of the right-wing mainstream happy.

In short: The Australian prime minister followed the bidding of his Semitic masters and remains a gutless, gutless Goy, self-identifying as a Jewish turd. Australia's anti-White Hate Laws have not been repealed. And for all intents and purposes, they remain unchanged.

@Cailen.

Source: http://www.theaustralian.com.au/national-affairs/turnbull-locks-in-racehate-law-reform/news-story/7a09e03b84c24585fcaf76c196225e0c?nk=5210ea90b0ec71d2453bb016f53292c9-1490079967 (https://www.google.com.au/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&ved=0ahUKEwjvsqKAvObSAhUDUbwKHbA-Dv4QFggbMAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.theaustralian.com.au%2Fnational-affairs%2Fturnbull-locks-in-racehate-law-reform%2Fnews-story%2F7a09e03b84c24585fcaf76c196225e0c&usg=AFQjCNHZQGnWKxT7-FcdUgEd765SslMP0Q&sig2=TDYkcadZGa8GB90rh2DkZQ)

Quote from: MSMLabor MP Linda Burney, the first Aboriginal woman elected to the House of Representatives, said "I challenge - in fact I demand - that those people that want to water down 18C come out here, face the media, face the Australian people, and say what it is that you can't say today that you will be able to say if you water down 18C ... ya White dogs." {Final words implied but allegedly not said.}

http://www.9news.com.au/national/2017/03/21/11/32/coalition-debate-watering-down-18c-racial-discrimination-act-on-harmony-day
Title: Re: Jewish Supremacists Lead Minorities Blocking Repeal of Hate Laws
Post by: Br.IanVonTurpie on Tue 21 Mar 2017
(https://encrypted-tbn2.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcR42g1FU0IjMDcjlbdQlmqeJIziIC47sxLS7EEEYKK-IwyoPtvY)

So technically speaking, if you go around in public and show this toy to a nigger, you could be in hot water?
Title: Re: Jewish Supremacists Lead Minorities Blocking Repeal of Hate Laws
Post by: Rev.Cambeul on Tue 21 Mar 2017
Forcing it to look is harassment.

Three months in prison for refusal to obey the judge of the High Court of Australia and say Sorry and hand over the cash like you've been told.

How many of those type of things do you think I have around my home now?  :obama
Title: Re: Jewish Supremacists Lead Minorities Blocking Repeal of Hate Laws
Post by: Br.IanVonTurpie on Tue 21 Mar 2017
(https://encrypted-tbn2.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcTyRbeaQ0x6WIWxOT1zwgTql-w9ry_ooKV4aao1MxobV80p-utR)


Perhaps if you showed a black this doll you may not be in trouble? So who determines harassment? The court or The victim?
Title: Re: Jewish Supremacists Lead Minorities Blocking Repeal of Hate Laws
Post by: Rev.Cambeul on Tue 21 Mar 2017
Quote from: Br.IanVonTurpie on Tue 21 Mar 2017So who determines harassment? The court or The victim?

The victim.
Title: Re: Jewish Supremacists Lead Minorities Blocking Repeal of Hate Laws
Post by: Br.IanVonTurpie on Wed 22 Mar 2017
Nothing has really changed you can still be Gaoled for hurting another person's feelings. The court would determine the level of harassment. So basically if you walked up to a person with a racially sensitive meme on an iPad and gesture for him to see it , you could be Gaoled for racial harassment.

It's not January in 1984, it's February.

But ... if a "reasonable" person did it they could be let off?

So I guess that means if a black man makes a racist cartoon like "boondocks" that's OK.

Or if a Jew makes racist jokes on "South park" he could get a free pass if he makes a joke about his own.

But perhaps if I turn the TV on and there are Jew jokes going on and a Jew is in the room, I could be the harasser?!
Title: Re: Jewish Supremacists Lead Minorities Blocking Repeal of Hate Laws
Post by: Rev.Cambeul on Wed 22 Mar 2017
Harassment is broadly defined as unwelcome conduct that a reasonable person would anticipate would offend, humiliate or intimidate the person harassed.

Source: https://www.humanrights.gov.au/employers/good-practice-good-business-factsheets/workplace-discrimination-harassment-and-bullying
Title: Re: Jewish Supremacists Lead Minorities Blocking Repeal of Hate Laws
Post by: Br.IanVonTurpie on Wed 22 Mar 2017
Ok next time the Arabs get on your doorstep for an unfriendly time, tell them you feel racially harassed! Call the cops and get them charged once the new law gets passed.
You were the reasonable person because it's your place and they weren't welcome to intimidate you on your doorstep. Set some precedents?
Title: Re: Jewish Supremacists Lead Minorities Blocking Repeal of Hate Laws
Post by: Rev.Cambeul on Wed 22 Mar 2017
Hate-Crime law doesn't work that way - Anywhere in the world.

They have been harassing me constantly, calling the coppers over nothing, making up BS stories in the neighbourhood trying to entice a mob response, threatening murder, assault, constant verbal abuse ... this has been going on for more than two years now. By any reasonable definition, that's harassment. Nevertheless, I am White and they are non-Whites. Ergo, I am not a so-called reasonable person, there is no racial harassment here. Please move along ....

On the other hand, by the old and the new Hate-Crime laws, my mere presence offends them. Therefore I am harassing them. Ergo, they are victims of a Hate-Crime.

I do not have any option to legal recourse. They believe that as they have declared me to be a "White Supremacist," a "Racist," a "Skinhead-Skinhead-Skinhead-Aryan Brotherhood," a "Nazi," they can get away with any crime including outright murder. They will not stop until they are gone or dealt with - and everything is likely to escalate at any time they get in the mood to pick a fight. There is only one response to threats of violence from scum like that, and it is extreme violence in return. So, as ...

The South Australian State Police - SAPOL's Security Intelligence Section/Political Police - have boasted that they monitor my every move ... they can read this and heed my warning:

KEEP YOUR FILTHY MUSLIM SCUM AWAY FROM ME YOU DAMN DIRTY PIGS, OR THERE WILL BE A FIGHT TO THE DEATH - AND I WILL NOT BE THE LOSER. AFTER THAT, I WILL GO TO WAR AND I'LL BE GUNNING FOR YOUR POLITICAL AND MULTICULTURAL MASTERS.

Read that and understand, copper. You have been warned. RAHOWA!


Reverend Cailen Cambeul,
Church of Creativity, S.A.
Creativity Alliance
Title: Re: Jewish Supremacists Lead Minorities Blocking Repeal of Hate Laws
Post by: Br.IanVonTurpie on Wed 22 Mar 2017
When does the law become effective? May be worth testing it out? Should we sit back and let it happen still?

Next time a black provoke me with " you bluddi white dog"". May be interesting to see what happens?
Title: Re: Jewish Supremacists Lead Minorities Blocking Repeal of Hate Laws
Post by: Rev.Cambeul on Wed 22 Mar 2017
Quote from: Br.IanVonTurpie on Wed 22 Mar 2017When does the law become effective?

The law was put in place by Paul Keating in the 90's. A couple of words changed now or next week does not change the intent or the interpretation of the law by every nigger with their hand out, race-traitors and the HRC.

Quote from: Hate-Law Purveyors - AHRCHarassment is broadly defined as unwelcome conduct that a reasonable person would anticipate would offend, humiliate or intimidate the person harassed.

Source: https://www.humanrights.gov.au/employers/good-practice-good-business-factsheets/workplace-discrimination-harassment-and-bullying

Quote from: Br.IanVonTurpie on Wed 22 Mar 2017Next time a black provoke me with " you bluddi white dog"". May be interesting to see what happens?

Nope. They're Black and you're White. You do not have any right to complain under these laws. Technically, you do have a right to complain as the laws are written to encompass all races ... but in practice, they were written to fence off White People/Racists from so-called minorities. They in effect have legal protection from being offended and humiliated, while we no longer have protection from physical assault.

The proof of this is from back in 2005/2006: West Australia had only enacted their state Hate-Crime laws a short year or five before ... A White nurse was attacked by a minority gang that later openly and proudly admitted everything they'd said and done, having dragged her out of her car, stomped her near to death, spat on her and racially humiliated her. They did not see a crime in their actions. The police charged them with Racial Vilification under the new laws. However, there was an outcry across the country from every Minority Supremacist group and their traitorous White libtard and Marxist supporters, as well as mainstream politicians.

The claim was that the charges should be dropped because Hate-Crime laws are designed to protect so-called minorities from White Racists. WA's state Attorney General stepped in and dropped all charges.

For Americans, it was Obongo's federal Attorney General that publicly declared in Washington, that the exact same racial hypocrisy rules America.

You are White. Your only right is to be quiet - shut up and die without offending any creature above you on the Ladder of Political Correctness, which you prop up with your diligence to hard work and taxes. (Not that I'm saying it's wrong to be diligent and work hard ... but for most, it's a constant struggle with nothing to gain except an oft-repeated kick in the arse: "Please sir, may I have another?")

(https://creativityalliance.com/forum/gallery/1/9-160117032311.png)

Destroy the system before it destroys you. RaHoWa!

@Cailen.
Title: Re: Jewish Supremacists Lead Minorities Blocking Repeal of Hate Laws
Post by: Br.IanVonTurpie on Sun 26 Mar 2017

https://www.google.com.au/amp/s/amp.ft.com/content/8e4453ce-1120-11e7-80f4-13e067d5072c


A teenage blogger who tested the limits of free expression and good taste in Singapore has been granted asylum in the US by a judge who said that he was persecuted for his political opinions.


Amos Yee, 18, has been jailed twice in Singapore. The first occasion was prompted by a YouTube video in which he lampooned Singapore's founding father Lee Kuan Yew days after his death in 2015, and compared the country's late leader to Jesus, saying both were "power-hungry and malicious."


The blogger also created an obscene image of Mr Lee, whose death prompted widespread mourning in Singapore.


On Friday US immigration judge Samuel Cole ruled that his treatment by Singapore authorities constituted "persecution on account of Yee's political opinions".


Mr Yee has been detained in the US since he arrived in Chicago seeking political asylum in December.


Phil Robertson, deputy Asia director for Human Rights Watch, a US pressure group, said: "The fact that the US immigration judge decided for Amos, overcoming strong objections by the US Department of Homeland Security, shows a recognition of just how severely Singapore restricts freedom of expression."


Well ,what have we got here? A boy from a safe nation that is a bit of a police state gets asylum in USA? Then we have refugees leaving a safe USA for Canada recently. Theoretically if Mr Yee can get asylum from USA, I could too if I was found guilty of Australia's 18c rules!

Title: Re: Jewish Supremacists Lead Minorities Blocking Repeal of Hate Laws
Post by: Br.IanVonTurpie on Sun 26 Mar 2017

http://www.adelaidenow.com.au/news/opinion/rex-jory-political-correctness-has-become-the-new-truth/news-story/fff6fedd99aed09950bb3ca502b6d0d8


THE Australia I love is disappearing. It's been hijacked by faceless people who worship at the altar of political correctness and personal offence.


These messengers of the new morality paint themselves as victims. They believe they are entitled to compensation or apology if they are offended. They seek reward or retribution for the slightest inconvenience.


These self-proclaimed victims use social media with such devastating effect they have wrested control of the nation's political, social and moral agenda. They tear down people who dare express a contrary view. They humiliate and intimidate anyone who challenges their beliefs. Megaphone politics.


They know best. Their view of Australia in 2017 must prevail. My way or the highway. Never mind that it is not the view of the majority of people.


These purveyors of the new morality are reminiscent of the racially-based Ku Klux Klan in the US. They plant a burning cross in the front yard of someone they accuse of breaching their often warped moral code while dressed anonymously in white robes and pointed hats.


They have crushed free speech and free expression by destroying community debate. People are now too frightened to say what they believe.


Political correctness twists and manipulates truth. It has become the new truth, the selective truth. Yet truth is no longer a defence. Just because someone expresses an opinion based on fact, they are not immune from being attacked and discredited on social media.


If someone dares criticise or even raise political, religious or racial issues which are contrary to the beliefs of the anonymous purists, the reaction and retribution can be swift and brutal. Often it resembles hate-speak.


Look at poor old Coopers, the beer makers. They were lampooned for being associated with a private discussion between two Liberal members of Parliament about same-sex marriage. The attack on social media was vicious. Then IBM copped it because one executive is in a Christian group.


Now they've turned on proposed changes to section 18C of the Racial Discrimination Act which currently threatens freedom of speech.


The Kokoda Track in Papua-New Guinea has become a target, with words like mateship being quietly erased from the lexicon. Mateship has been replaced by friendship. Never mind the Diggers and their families — let alone the wider community — who are offended.


In the new social agenda, mateship has become hateship. It has transferred power from the individual and a structured system of authority to a faceless, intangible force fuelled by moral indignation.


We are no longer allowed to be involved in civilised debate or think for ourselves. If the trend continues, then as a nation we are no longer civilised.


The Australian character has been stripped and reconstructed in the image of political correctness. The Australian larrikin has become an endangered species. Whatever happened to Australia's "have a go" spirit? What happened to our irreverent sense of humour? What happened to common sense and the brave "she'll be right" credo which helped build this country?


The Australian community has fragmented. We are no longer a single, coherent society. People are judged on what they are, what they believe and not what they have achieved or contributed.


For too many people, the first reaction is to lay blame and seek compensation through intimidation or litigation. Whatever cloak they wear — race, colour, gender, occupation, age, religion, physical appearance — they claim the moral high ground.


I don't begrudge people holding strong beliefs. That's their right in a democracy. I agree with some of them. But I resent being bullied into accepting those views under duress — or remaining silent.


Those promoting victimhood and personal offence as the path forward have used social media to promote their agenda by fear and suppression.


It's time those who have taken the alternative path of meek silence spoke out and exposed the politics of victimhood as a false god.


If not the face and character of Australia, the Australia I love, will be lost. At the moment the people with the loudest megaphone are winning.

Title: Re: Jewish Supremacists Lead Minorities Blocking Repeal of Hate Laws
Post by: Rev.Cambeul on Tue 28 Mar 2017
Libtards cheer as Jews, Muslims and Traitors unite to condemn non-existent changes to Hate-Crime laws as the will of White Supremacist, goose-stepping Nazi Racists ...

http://www.smh.com.au/entertainment/tv-and-radio/qa-recap-unlikely-alliance-rubbish-proposed-changes-to-racial-discrimination-act-20170327-gv7r9k.html

Remember, just being White and Present in Australia is reason enough to cause OFFENCE to so-called minorities.
Title: Re: Jewish Supremacists Lead Minorities Blocking Repeal of Hate Laws
Post by: Br.IanVonTurpie on Wed 29 Mar 2017
Bendigo Three Case Highlights Totalitarian Thought Crime Logic Of Victorian Government in the wake of the most recent London terror attack and the public debate over the Federal government's intention to amend the Racial Discrimination Act's thought crime section (Section 18c), the Victorian government has swung in the opposite direction and wishes to impose harsh penalties upon those who may criticise any aspect of Islam.

Our view of this Victorian effort is to demand publicly the repeal of all State laws and the Commonwealth Criminal Code section, which relate to vilification, hatred, incitement and all the rest of it. These laws are political machinery, not only designed to curtail freedom of expression, but to empower the deep-state with mechanisms to actually crush political dissent. They have next to zero connection with some idiot who may mouth 'hateful' words.

In the entire public debate on Section 18c the existence of these laws and their meaning is avoided and we thank (sic) the Victorian government for coming forward as they have the case of the Bendigo Three now takes on an even more vital component.

The Bendigo Three must be backed up by all concerned Australians. We notice that the loudmouths who always carry on about Islam this and Islam that, from Pauline Hanson to Liberty Alliance, from the Reclaim group to Cory's Tories - are silent about the case of the Bendigo Three.

Is it because this case strikes at the very core of real civil liberty, real democratic liberty, and not at the flummery? The case of the Bendigo Three is the Australian people's challenge to the soft-totalitarian thought-crime logic of many within the political elite!

If you stand for freedom of expression: support the Bendigo Three!

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4334976/Victoria-threatens-make-harder-criticise-Islam.html

From the Australia first party Newsletter
http://www.australiafirstparty.net
https://www.facebook.com/Australia-First-Party-643159555758945

More information at Australia First Party: Lawful Demonstration Leads to Hate-Crime Charges
https://creativityalliance.com/forum/index.php/topic,9247.0.html
Title: Re: Jewish Supremacists Lead Minorities Blocking Repeal of Hate Laws
Post by: Br.IanVonTurpie on Thu 30 Mar 2017
http://www.adelaidenow.com.au/news/national/racial-discrimination-act-18c-changes-defeated-in-senate/news-story/2abf0c4d6a72d785354f5c77fadc2072 (http://www.adelaidenow.com.au/news/national/racial-discrimination-act-18c-changes-defeated-in-senate/news-story/2abf0c4d6a72d785354f5c77fadc2072)

CONTENTIOUS changes to the Racial Discrimination Act — which have bitterly divided the Federal Government for the past four years — have been voted down by the Senate

The Turnbull Government's attempts to remove of the offences "insult", "humiliate", and "offend" and replace them with "harass" in section 18C of the Act were on Thursday night defeated by Labor, Greens and key crossbench senators, 31-28.

But the Government was set to win key changes to the process of the handling of complaints under the Act — which have included several high-profile cases in the past five years.

The commission will be given greater powers to filter complaints which are deemed to be frivolous or without merit and those who are the subject of the complaint will get an early warning when a complaint is lodged.

MPs and senators were forced to stay in Canberra last night as the government attempted to pass key legislation ahead of a five-week break before the May Budget.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lMQHVzSPTec
Title: Re: Jewish Supremacists Lead Minorities Blocking Repeal of Hate Laws
Post by: Rev.Cambeul on Thu 30 Mar 2017
So, replacing one word that means exactly the same as the words it is meant to replace has failed, as it is supposedly watering down Hate Crime law in Australia.

Here's a Haiku for you:
Fück you Jew;
Fück you Jigaboo;
Fück you Sand Monkey and Gook too.
Go bitch and claim your reward.
Title: Re: Jewish Supremacists Lead Minorities Blocking Repeal of Hate Laws
Post by: Rev.Cambeul on Thu 30 Mar 2017
Quote from: Ice T on Thu 30 Mar 2017Shut up and be happy

" I'm just a postman ... 88"
Kostner.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VeKz_hV9zag
The Jew has plans for Israel ... but the plans for you leave you wishing you were poo.
Title: Re: Jewish Supremacists Lead Minorities Blocking Repeal of Hate Laws
Post by: Rev.Cambeul on Tue 25 Apr 2017
Jews planning to bring in new laws: Anyone caught with a swastika ...

https://www.change.org/p/eshley-baker-help-make-public-display-of-the-nazi-swastika-illegal-in-australia?recruiter=9011937&utm_source=share_petition&utm_medium=facebook&utm_campaign=autopublish&utm_term=mob-md-share_petition-no_msg
Title: Re: Jewish Supremacists Lead Minorities Blocking Repeal of Hate Laws
Post by: Rev.Cambeul on Tue 25 Apr 2017
18C protects Muslim pedophiles and extremists

29 March 2017

Extract: Race-hate speech laws must be changed so people can "call out" Muslim terrorists, perverts and child mutilators, a One Nation senator has told parliament.

Malcolm Roberts says Australian Islamists are the real beneficiaries of section 18C of the Racial Discrimination Act, comparing restrictions on race-hate speech to "Stalinist repression".

"If your Muslim Sudanese neighbour is engaging in female genital mutilation or your Syrian Muslim cafe owner is a terrorist building a bomb or maybe just the Afghan Muslims in the public housing flat next to you are molesting small children, chances are that you are afraid to speak out," he said.

"Ordinary, decent people are simply afraid to speak the truth.

"We want to be able to call out Muslim drug dealers, child mutilators, hate preachers , terrorists and perverts."

Read more at http://www.9news.com.au/national/2017/03/28/03/31/senate-to-receive-race-hate-law-report#FkmmYdQ0me71Y3AY.99

http://www.news.com.au/national/politics/18c-protects-muslim-criminals-says-one-nation/news-story/8895978a21a60f83bf9fb2c6c7d2d4cd
Title: Re: Jewish Supremacists Lead Minorities Blocking Repeal of Hate Laws
Post by: Rev.Cambeul on Tue 25 Apr 2017
Proposed race-hate law changes fail in Senate after fiery debate

9 News (http://www.9news.com.au/) | 30 March 2017

http://www.9news.com.au/national/2017/03/30/13/37/australians-are-not-racist-hanson

Extract: The Turnbull government wanted the words "offend", "insult" and "humiliate" in Section 18C of the Racial Discrimination Act changed to "harass and intimidate".

It also wanted to tweak the way the Human Rights Commission deals with complaints, a move with broad support.

Labor, the Greens, the Nick Xenophon Team and crossbencher Jacqui Lambie opposed changes to the wording of 18C, robbing the government of the 39 votes it needs to get it through the upper house.

The attempt to re-word 18C was killed off by a Labor amendment to the bill, 31 votes to 28, leaving the commission's process changes remaining.
Title: Re: Jewish Supremacists Lead Minorities Blocking Repeal of Hate Laws
Post by: Rev.Cambeul on Tue 12 Jun 2018
The Australian Race Discrimination Commission continues to discriminate against White Australians by refusing to acknowledge anti-White Racism while promoting anti-White racism within the community. Renaming the office or the commissioner is not good enough. Ban the anti-White Race Discrimination Commission  ...


Australians must resist changing 'race discrimination' title, says outgoing commissioner

Jacqueline Maley (http://twitter.com/@JacquelineMaley) | Sydney Morning Herald (https://www.smh.com.au/) | 11 June 2018

https://www.smh.com.au/politics/federal/australians-must-resist-changing-race-discrimination-title-says-outgoing-commissioner-20180611-p4zks7.html

The title of Race Discrimination Commissioner should be left untouched and Australians "must be ready to stand up" against any efforts to change it to something less "divisive", says the outgoing commissioner, Tim Soutphommasane.

The warning puts Dr Soutphommasane at odds with his boss at the commission, Rosalind Croucher, and Attorney-General Christian Porter, who have canvassed a more "conciliatory" title for the role.

(https://static.ffx.io/images/$zoom_0.284%2C$multiply_1.0317460317460319%2C$ratio_1%2C$width_378%2C$x_77%2C$y_0/t_crop_custom/t_sharpen%2Cq_auto%2Cf_auto/9e843e9ca8ab6363a5e1a16feda2036373b75fd6)
Tim Soutphommasane doesn't grope pussy, he eats pussy!

"Being direct about fighting racism doesn't sit well with some people. That's perhaps one reason why some have suggested that the office of Race Discrimination Commissioner be renamed or redefined, that it should be called the Community Relations Commissioner or something similar," Dr Soutphommasane will say on Tuesday in a speech in Sydney.

"It has been suggested that the work of a Race Discrimination Commissioner is divisive.

"Those who desire amending the Racial Discrimination Act must know this: the multicultural mainstream of Australian society will not accept any weakening of our laws, or our public stance against racial discrimination."

Dr Soutphomassane's strong opposition to the idea pits him against Human Rights Commission president Rosalind Croucher, who first canvassed a title change during a Senate Estimates hearing in May, and Mr Porter, who says there "could be merit to that type of concept".

In response to a question from LNP senator Ian Macdonald, who asserted it was difficult to find "any but very rare cases of racism in Australia", Professor Croucher observed that when the commission was first established in 1975, the role was entitled "Commissioner for Community Relations".

"The Race Discrimination Commissioner, in a way, I'd quite like to shift the titles almost back to the Commissioner for Community Relations," she said.

But Dr Soutphommasane, who led the Commission's successful campaign against changes to section 18C of the Racial Discrimination Act - which were promised and then dropped under Tony Abbott - disagrees with Professor Croucher.

"At a time when extremist nationalism is on the march, we should be ramping up our efforts to fight racism, not retreating from them," Dr Soutphommasane will tell the National Forum on Racial Tolerance and Community Harmony on Tuesday.

"We must be on-guard, not only to the risk of our public discourse deteriorating, but also to the risk, yet again, of legislative change ... fair-minded libtarded White Australians and ethnic and Indigenous communities, must be ready to stand up."

Attorney-General Christian Porter, who will soon select Dr Soutphomassane's successor, told Fairfax Media he will consider changing the Race Discrimination Commissioner title.

"There could well be merit to that type of concept, which is better defining the role both in terms of its name but also its operation," Mr Porter said.

"The role I perceive is conciliatory and to mediate and not to be divisive or contribute to division, so that is why I have some interest in what Rosalind Croucher had to say."

Dr Soutphommasane will step down from his post in August after five years in the role. He was not offered a renewal of his term, but made it clear he did not seek one.

He was the subject of criticism from some quarters for his role in the campaign against changing section 18C, and he was accused of "soliciting" race discrimination complaints against the late cartoonist Bill Leak.


There were 53 applicants for his job, from which a shortlist has been compiled by a panel consisting the Secretary of the Attorney-General's department Chris Moraitis, Professor Croucher and Department of Social Services Secretary Kathryn Campbell.

Following interviews, the panel will recommend the best candidate or candidates to the Attorney-General.

However, Mr Porter is not compelled to choose from the recommended shortlist and can make his own "Captain's Pick" for the role.
Title: Re: Jewish Supremacists Lead Minorities Blocking Repeal of Hate Laws
Post by: Br.IanVonTurpie on Fri 13 Sep 2019
Australian Parliament run by Jews

Jew World Order  (http://www.jewworldorder.org/)| 30 August 2019

* Australian Parliament run by Jews
* First Torah Completed in Australia's Parliament in Canberra
* More than 150 people attend the event, followed by a joyous procession in the streets

* Australia's Abo population is 3%
* Australia's Jewish population is 0.4%
Jews are overrepresented in Australian Parliament

http://www.jewworldorder.org/australian-parliament-run-by-jews

Photo Below: Rabbi Eli Gutnick, right, finishes the final letter of a new Torah in the Canberra Parliament House, witnessed by The (((Hon. Josh Frydenberg, MP))), seated next to him. Standing, from left, are (((Dr. Mike Freelander, MP))); The (((Hon. Mark Dreyfus, MP))); Rabbi Shmueli Feldman, co-director of Chabad ACT in Canberra; (((Julian Leeser, MP))); and the (((Hon. Michael Danby, MP))). Behind them is (((Menachem Feldman))). (Photo: Andrew Taylor)

Members of the Australian Parliament, government ministers, foreign diplomats, local Jewish residents and guests gathered on Oct. 19, exactly one week after the Jewish holiday of Simchat Torah, in the country's capital city to celebrate the completion of a new Torah scroll—the first for Chabad there and the first ever witnessed in the central government building.

The scroll was written for the Chabad Australian Capitol Territory in Canberra, and underwritten by Dr. Alena Rada and Jacob Reich. Five Jewish ministers of parliament were honored with writing a letter in the scroll during the dedication ceremony and celebratory luncheon. More than 150 people attended the event, including Chabad rabbis; Jewish communal leaders; and diplomats from Israel, Argentina, Belgium, Poland and Romania; along with representatives of other religious faiths.

(http://www.jewworldorder.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/Australian-Jews-5276.jpg)
The Hon. Josh Frydenberg, Minister for the Environment and Energy, said "the Torah has been the basis of our religious and moral obligations, as well as our civil laws" since G‑d handed it down to Moses on Mount Sinai. He noted that the record number of Jewish parliamentarians from a cross-section of political parties exemplified how being a good Jew and a good Australian is not a contradiction, but rather, a testament to how welcoming Australia continues to be to the Jewish community

Attendees watched as the final verse of the scroll was handwritten by scribe Rabbi Eli Gutnick. Each of the five Jewish MPs witnessed the inscription of the final word, "Israel," which consists of five letters in Hebrew and refers to the Jewish people. On the cover itself is written: "This historic Torah is dedicated to the longstanding support and friendship of the Australian Parliament to the Jewish community

"A Torah completion is considered a citywide holiday in Judaism. It is an especially great celebration for our community, as it is the first Torah that will belong to our synagogue," said Rabbi Shmueli Feldman, who has co-directed Chabad ACT with his wife, Chasia, for the past five years. "This was the first time that many of Australia's Members of Parliament and senators were able to see a Torah, and be exposed to some of the beautiful and timeless traditions in person."
(http://www.jewworldorder.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/07/savetweetvid_D_Zkn1NXYAUF_-9.gif)
Among those present was Michael Danby, the longest-serving Jewish Member of Parliament, who said in his remarks that everyone present is "witness to a proud declaration of what a great country Australia is with a first Torah-scroll completion in Parliament House

Since Chabad ACT was established in 2009, the congregation has been relying on borrowed scrolls, but it was clear that they eventually would need their own Torah. As Theo Menachemson, who serves as treasurer of Chabad ACT, explained: "The growth in the community adds to the absolute need for the presence of a Torah—and even a second and third Torah."

Many helped secure the funds needed to write the community's first Torah scroll, including synagogue members, family, friends, and people in other Australian cities and places abroad. Some of those same contributors came to participate in the traditional inauguration of a new scroll—the hachnasat sefer Torah ceremony—held at the Chabad House later that evening. Before the gala dinner there, the Torah was joyously marched down the streets of Canberra under a chuppah, a Jewish wedding canopy.

Chabad is Judaism's largest outreach movement in Australia, with more than 100 centers throughout the country.

Given that Canberra is the seat of the Australian government, Feldman noted the significance of welcoming the finished scroll at the diplomatic venue, saying "this historic Torah is dedicated to the longstanding support and friendship of the Australian Parliament to the Jewish community

 :-\ Can you see our Deputy Prime Minister :- (((Josh Frydenburg))) top centre dancing around here?