Creator Forum - Racial Loyalty News Online

Racial Loyalty News => General News => Downunder News => Topic started by: Rev.Cambeul on Sun 13 Jan 2013

Title: NSW Premier to Intensify "Hate Crime" Laws
Post by: Rev.Cambeul on Sun 13 Jan 2013
O'Farrell moves to strengthen hate laws

http://www.smh.com.au/nsw/ofarrell-moves-to-strengthen-hate-laws-20130112-2cmh5.html (http://www.smh.com.au/nsw/ofarrell-moves-to-strengthen-hate-laws-20130112-2cmh5.html)

Sean Nicholls | Sydney Morning Herald (http://www.smh.com.au/) | January 13, 2013

{SNIP}

[An inquiry has been] ordered by the [New South Wales] Premier, Barry O'Farrell, who is concerned there have been no successful criminal prosecutions in the history of the NSW [racial vilification/hate crime] laws and that they have fallen out of step with community expectations.

The move is likely to inflame the debate over freedom of speech, amid warnings that broadening the laws could be dangerous and unacceptable.

{SNIP}

The parliamentary inquiry will focus on Section 20D of the NSW Anti-Discrimination Act, which deals with the criminal offence of ''serious racial vilification'' and requires proof ''beyond a reasonable doubt'' for a prosecution.

Penalties of up to $5500 and six months' jail apply to anyone found guilty of inciting ''hatred'', ''serious contempt'' or ''severe ridicule'' of a person or group by threatening physical harm to them or their property or inciting others to do so on the basis of their race. [I long ago lost count of the amount of times I've been on the receiving end of that one because of Black hatred of Whites and their (typical) immunity to prosecution ~ Cailen.]

The vilification laws have been in place in NSW since 1989. According to figures supplied by the NSW Anti-Discrimination Board, 27 complaints have been referred by the board for criminal prosecution since 1998 the period for which records are available. But none were prosecuted as the Director of Public Prosecutions did not feel the burden of proof required by the legislation would have been achieved.

{SNIP}

The president of the NSW Anti- Discrimination Board, Stepan Kerkyasharian, said the inquiry was overdue. ''It's a great opportunity to deal with this matter,'' he said.

The chief executive of the NSW Jewish Board of Deputies, Vic Alhadeff, said the NSW law was ''completely ineffective in that for all practical purposes it is impossible to prove the elements of the offence in any specific case''.

But director of the Legal Rights Project at the Institute of Public Affairs Simon Breheny, warned against broadening the law.

''The government is justified in restricting threats of physical harm,'' he said.

''The current Section 20D is therefore appropriate as far as it restricts conduct of this kind. However, any weakening of Section 20D risks impacting on our fundamental right to free speech.''

The NSW inquiry comes amid the furore about a proposed overhaul of federal anti-discrimination laws, which would make it unlawful to offend a person. The draft laws have been criticised by the former chief justice of NSW, Jim Spigelman, who believes they risk putting Australia in breach of its international obligations to protect free speech. [more ... (http://www.smh.com.au/nsw/ofarrell-moves-to-strengthen-hate-laws-20130112-2cmh5.html)]



Comment:

These politicians that talk about multiculturalism and unity between the races are full of crap. This is an attempt to persecute White people who question Black, Asian, Jewish et al Supremacy, while gaining the non-White and the do-gooder vote. All it will accomplish is the further division between Whites and non-Whites, as White people realise that even the most innocent interactions with non-Whites can result in accusations, arrest and conviction for crimes that non-Whites will remain immune to.

Premier Barry O'Farrell and Prime Minister Julia Gillard, go ahead, do your worst! The ordinary, everyday, White Australian that you and your kind so willingly discard in your utopian rainbow meanderings will vote your arses out of office so quickly, that your ivory tower dwelling peers will not even have the chance to say goodbye. Meanwhile, your more intelligent ebonic constituents will be out for your blood when they realise that Whites, afraid of persecution by a vexatious non-White population, will refuse to employ or socialise with non-Whites of any description. And the remainder of your non-White friends will turn increasingly violent as they realise that they are permitted to do whatever the hell they like - just as long as the victim is a White/Racist. ... Go ahead, do your worst! For like it or not, we will have racial separation. Your kind just make it easier for White men and women to make the necessary choices.

@Cailen.
Title: Re: NSW Premier to Intensify "Hate Crime" Laws
Post by: Br.IanVonTurpie on Sun 13 Jan 2013
http://www.adelaidenow.com.au/news/south-australia/bikie-bans-dangerous-to-enforce-say-adelaide-restaurant-owners/story-e6frea83-1226552709629 (http://www.adelaidenow.com.au/news/south-australia/bikie-bans-dangerous-to-enforce-say-adelaide-restaurant-owners/story-e6frea83-1226552709629)

BEFORE closing for Christmas renovations, Rigoni's Bistro kept a list of police orders banning bikies from entering the premises.            
But Rigoni's Bistro proprietor Tony Bailey says he's now given up trying to enforce the mounting orders.
With the Leigh St restaurant due to re-open tomorrow after Christmas renovations, the number of orders has grown to almost 80 since 34 before the closure.
"You look at them and think, `we're supposed to enforce this'?" Mr Bailey said.
After a violent bikie fight earlier this week at a crowded Asian restaurant, Orientai, in Adelaide's northeast, Crime Gangs Taskforce Detective Superintendent John De Candia said licensed venues should be turning bikies away.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Well I guess you aren't allowed much freedom nowadays .. if you look like a bikie you aren't allowed to go to a resteraunt because you "don't look right".

http://www.ntnews.com.au/article/2009/04/02/42735_ntnews.html (http://www.ntnews.com.au/article/2009/04/02/42735_ntnews.html)
Now as far as "hate crime" goes. Well That doesn't apply to white people who face discrimination at non white hands!

TERRITORY rubbish warrior Trevor Jenkins has been kicked out by a local council amid claims he assaulted council staff and embarrassed the shire.

The Pride of Australia medal winner is back in Darwin after being told to leave Wadeye where he had been working.

Victoria-Daly shire chief executive Sandra Cannon said Mr Jenkins was told to leave Wadeye, accompanied by police, after assaulting two council staff members.

"(It) was reported to police," she said.

"The traditional owners asked him to leave their land."


Jenkins was kicked out because he challenged the council's waste management performance.

"He was very much appreciated by the community but the shire was embarrassed," he said.

Ms Cannon denied this.

Mr Jenkins said the incident occurred after he was trying to get a CDEP crew to work with.



"They said they wanted all indigenous people, and not me," he said. "In the end, I blew up ... at the CDEP lady, and a woman from the environment office."

He said he might have touched one woman on the shoulder but was gentle: "I was walking along ... all I can think is that I put my hand on her shoulder.

"They went to police and accused me of assault - the next thing I know I was on a plane out of there."

He said he had been made a "scapegoat".

"(I feel) a bit hurt, there are lessons I have to learn."
in Australia.
Title: Re: NSW Premier to Intensify "Hate Crime" Laws
Post by: Rev.Cambeul on Sun 13 Jan 2013
Quote from: Br.IanVonTurpie on Sun 13 Jan 2013Well I guess you aren't allowed much freedom nowadays .. if you look like a bikie you aren't allowed to go to a resteraunt because you "don't look right".

True. If you are a White male and don't look or dress like an effeminate pansy, you can be banned from the premises - no questions asked. I have often been told that they don't serve my kind while dressed in clean jeans, polished boots, collared shirt and a dress jacket. The trick the scum and wimps that are dressed by their wives use is to dress down so they look like something you are not. That is exactly what the Muslim gangsters that have taken over most of the outlaw motorcycle clubs do ... but it is something I refuse to do. As a consequence, they, foreign and trendy can go anywhere they like and cause any problems they like, while White males in my age group who have refused to change their clothing styles to keep up with the feminist dominated male clothing fashions of today are automatically barred! To put a stop to this anti-White discrimination, all the JOG need do is cease referring to these Muslim gangsters as "bikies" and instead call them what they are; but the JOG is openly playing the race card in an effort to attack the masculinity of White males in their efforts to create a more effeminate society, by using the bad behaviour of non-Whites as the excuse to turn on White males who fit the appearance that the JOG plays upon.

Incidentally, I have also been into many places wearing suits and ties and rarely had any problems, but regardless of how I was dressed, I would sometimes still be on the receiving end of problems from other patrons who are suspicious, annoying pests, but are welcome because they are regulars. One time I was quietly sipping a drink in the Adelaide Casino and watching the roulette, when one of the gambling fools tried to hit me up for a loan. I refused, so the insults started: People like me only wear suits because we've been to court .... The few words I whispered into his ear must have registered in his expression, because bouncers came over and escorted him out. I was ordered to leave after finishing my drink.

Another time I stopped into a pub (the Elephant and Castle) on the way home after working on someone's computer that morning, and a red tried it on because of my shaved head. Suit and tie didn't matter, the red was a local and thought it could raise the pub against me. That one got a smack in the teeth, which was enough to deal with the red and none of the other regulars raised as much as a finger. I abused the bar staff for allowing such behaviour of their regulars, threw my glass on the floor and walked out. Some months later I was in another bar (Marion Hotel) - this time in jeans, boots, Creator shirt and bomber jacket - when a maniacal little tart came up to me and started screaming about me going into her pub dressed in disguise ... blah blah rant and rave as she stormed out, disgusted that anyone would deign to serve individuals such as me in that place. Unfortunately for the maniacal little tart, I was well known in that particular pub. But, apparently we're not even permitted to wear a suit and tie because people like us must dress in a particular way so as to be recognised instantly for what we are - second class citizens with no right to participate in THEIR feminist, homoerotic, inferior mud loving, drug oriented society.

If you haven't guessed, I do not care to go to pubs any more. It's thanks to these anti "bikie" campaigns that normal White males are harassed by bar and restaurant staff wherever we go, and I do not care to fork over a single penny to these traitors. And I'm willing to bet that both Premier Barry and his red tart Ju-liar would both deny me - or any of us protection under their proposed worsening of anti-White laws.

@Cailen.
Title: Re: NSW Premier to Intensify "Hate Crime" Laws
Post by: Br.IanVonTurpie on Sun 13 Jan 2013
The real thing that sucks is.. if you are asked by the staff to leave for what ever reason you must leave by law or you risk going to court for "disorderly conduct". Regardless of if you were well behaved or not to start with. What makes a person who is not dressed in "bikie" attire less of a dangerous person?
Some of the most dangerous people I have come accross look nothing like bikies!
Infact alot of the bikies I have seen nowadays in the younger crowd wear stuff like :- baseball hats, hooded sweaters, jeans, nike's. The only things that may make you think they are in a gang is they wear "rope chains" and are heavily tattooed. However you don't need to be a bikie to have tattoos.. as every second person has ink nowadays. It is a bloody waste of time asking staff to try and play "witch hunt" over who is a "bikie" and who isn't.
Title: Re: NSW Premier to Intensify "Hate Crime" Laws
Post by: JamieW on Sun 13 Jan 2013
I work in security and all I need to do is say you're showing signs of intox, ask you to leave immeadiatley..if you refuse I have a few options,bounce you on you're head or call police and have you removed and fined for fail to quit....so yeah if security don't like the look of you you're screwed..