Creator Forum - Racial Loyalty News Online

Racial Loyalty News => General News => Downunder News => Topic started by: Rev.Cambeul on Tue 27 Apr 2010

Title: No free speech for racists, says Federal Attorney-General
Post by: Rev.Cambeul on Tue 27 Apr 2010
No free speech for racists, says Robert McClelland
By Peter Veness From:AAP | April 27, 2010

http://www.adelaidenow.com.au/news/breaking-news/no-free-speech-for-racists-says-robert-mcclelland/story-e6frea73-1225858945012?from=public_rss (http://www.adelaidenow.com.au/news/breaking-news/no-free-speech-for-racists-says-robert-mcclelland/story-e6frea73-1225858945012?from=public_rss)

"FREEDOM of speech only goes so far and it does not stretch to racism," Attorney-General Robert McClelland says.

In a speech to a cyber-racism summit in Sydney, Mr McClelland said the Government was tackling the difficult world of cyber bullying and online protection of children.

"It may well be appropriate to set some limitation to public expression of hateful material," Mr McClelland said.

He said cyber-racism was a growing area of concern for the Human Rights Commission. Eighteen per cent of racism complaints handed to the Commission in 2008-09 were about racist internet material, up from nine per cent in the previous year.

He said the rise meant the Government would be asking the Commission to do further work on the issue.

"One of the fundamental principles of a democratic society like Australia is freedom of expression," Mr McClelland said.

"Freedom of expression is a human right that is enjoyed by all Australians and must be protected.

"However, a right to freedom of expression should not derogate from the rights of people to be treated with equality, dignity and respect."

The speech was one of Mr McClelland's last formal duties before travelling to Washington DC to meet with attorneys-general from Canada, Britain, New Zealand and the US. The quintet will be focused on issues of national security and terrorism but will also touch on increasing legal cooperation.

Mr McClelland has also been promised classified briefings from the Obama administration on intelligence and cyber security.



Just what is determined as "hate speech" or "racism?"

Anything to do with White people alone.
Anything to do with pride for White people.
Any demands by Whites for truly equal rights.
Racially stereotyped humour aimed at non-Whites.
Anything a Jew, Black or other non-White "feels" is racist.
Anything the government or government appointed officials think non-Whites feel is racist.
et cetera ....


And just what is not determined as "hate speech" or "racism?"


Jewish pride, Black Pride, Black Power, Asian Pride, et al ..., Gay Pride and anything politically correct.
Jewish Supremacist groups for a Greater Israel.
Jewish lies and propaganda, whether it's from the Christinsane Bible or modern day politicians making up stories of atrocities against Jews.
Racially stereotyped humour aimed at Whites.
Blacks kicking the hell out of Whites for fun.
Blacks demanding the extermination of Whites.
Non-Whites glorifying in the pack rape and murder of White girls.
Asians refusing White customers in their shops and restaurants.
And the list goes on ....

Another case of "racist," hate speech" is when a White person attempts to make a complaint about any of the above. This is nothing more than the government protecting the hate speech of non-Whites while destroying the morale of Whites who do believe in actual equal rights or wish to separate themselves such as we Creators do and pursue their lives with the same self determination guaranteed to ALL non-Whites.

The intention is to crush all disagreement with government policies such as "Sorry Day" and changes to National Holidays such as ANZAC Day and Australia Day to make them completely multicultural/multiracial with any emphasis on White Australian culture as "racist" in origin and practice. It has already been stated by local governments and the media that White Australians carrying or bearing the Australian flag on a National Holiday should be picked up by the police and forced to move on or be charged with whatever offences possible.

In the United States orders that originated with the ADL were passed out to law enforcement agencies around the country ordering them to harass any White person who looks like they may be an American Patriot. i.e. Flag carrying, bumper sticker wearing White Americans, former soldiers - anyone that may be construed as in opposition to the latest, freedom hating governmental bureaucracy we have in control today. And if you believe that can not happen in Australia, then I am informing you now that it is already happening. I have the Southern Cross on the back window of my car and I've already had coppers following me around. It has nothing to do with my car or how it looks, as my car is a generic, run of the mill locally made vehicle - but it has that Southern Cross on the back window and that's what makes it different to the others. According to the media, Jewish groups, Abo Rights groups, ad nauseum ..., just that symbol alone makes me a Nazi and that means I am fare game for any form of governmental abuse.

@Cailen.
Title: Re: No free speech for racists, says Federal Attorney-General
Post by: Rev.Cambeul on Wed 28 Apr 2010
https://sacreator.com/2010/04/28/no-free-speech-for-white-people-federal-attorney-general (https://sacreator.com/2010/04/28/no-free-speech-for-white-people-federal-attorney-general)

A revised version of my comment on the above article while keeping within the confines of copyright law (60 words or less quoted from the source article).

@Cailen.
Title: Re: No free speech for racists, says Federal Attorney-General
Post by: Nick2019 on Wed 28 Apr 2010
It's the same here. Take the recent attack on the BNP for example. They're prosecuted for having a whites-only membership policy yet those groups that admit only non-whites such as the Black Police Association, the Black Student Union, the Black Britain group and many others are considered to be a worthy and highly-respectable cause. This is Marxism at its worst.
It seems that a person only has "free speech" if that speech is politically correct.