I have said to many that Russian Communism was just a Nationalist Russian form of Socialism. Like China, it might have had Marxist icons and spouted Marxist diatribe from time to time, but it was Nationalist in its approach to global affairs.
Just one question: Where in the text below is the chastising of Europe for screwing itself into the ground financially, racially and culturally ...? The Chink would not do that. He needs to blame Whitey. Not the refugee army that China is happy to see pollute and destroy old Europa. Meanwhile, China continues with its financial, racial and cultural expansionist policies leading to global domination.
@Cailen.
Jin Liqun: Europe induces 'sloth, indolence' The chairman of China's sovereign wealth fund remains sceptical about supporting a European bailout.http://english.aljazeera.net/programmes/talktojazeera/2011/11/2011114434664695.html (http://english.aljazeera.net/programmes/talktojazeera/2011/11/2011114434664695.html)
As the global financial crisis continues to hit the eurozone, Nicolas Sarkozy, the French president, and other European leaders have been banking on China to step in and wave its magic wand. But is China prepared to bail out Europe?
Al Jazeera's Teymoor Nabili talks to Jin Liqun, the supervising chairman of China Investment Corporation, China's sovereign wealth fund, to find out whether China is willing to invest more money in Europe, in particular in the European Financial Stability Fund (IFSF), which European leaders now want to beef up for future bailouts.
Jin, who has served as China's deputy minister of finance and vice president of the Asian Development Bank, manages $400bn worth of the nation's money through the sovereign wealth fund. He says that unless Europe changes its labour laws and adjusts its welfare system, he does not consider it to be a profitable investment.
Quote from: Jin LiqunIf you look at the troubles which happened in European countries, this is purely because of the accumulated troubles of the worn out welfare society. I think the labour laws are outdated. The labour laws induce sloth, indolence, rather than hardworking. The incentive system, is totally out of whack...
Why should, for instance, within [the] eurozone some member's people have to work to 65, even longer, whereas in some other countries they are happily retiring at 55, languishing on the beach? This is unfair...
The welfare system is good for any society to reduce the gap, to help those who happen to have disadvantages, to enjoy the life, but a welfare society should not induce people not to work hard.
Quote from: Rev.Cambeul.PM on Mon 07 Nov 2011
I have said to many that Russian Communism was just a Nationalist Russian form of Socialism. Like China, it might have had Marxist icons and spouted Marxist diatribe from time to time, but it was Nationalist in its approach to global affairs.
The revolution in Russia and their policy right up until Stalin took over was entirely Jewish and was a Marxist oligarchy, with no sense of nationalism or even socialism. When Stalin took over, the oligarchy remained but you're right that Russia started to exert it's own nationalist image, albeit with the symbolism and rhetoric of Marxism.
A lot of the Asian Marxists, whether Chinese or Vietnamese, have admitted that their choice to revolt under the banner of Marxism was more because it was the only "revolutionary ideology" available and well known at the time. They also knew, if they were communists, they could get the financial and military support from the USSR. The Asian countries, especially China, never lost their national identity as the revolution was their own (rather than Jewish), once the revolution was over, the Marxist overtones began to disappear. The China of today is much more similar to the old Empire than any form of communism.
I greatly doubt the Chinese are going to "bail out" Europe, if anything, they will buy whatever they can and turn Europe in to another of their colonies.
You're mostly right, Rev. Scott.
However, China, up until Mao's death was pretty much the same as USSR was until Lenin's death. Mao kept that revolution going with his idiotic ideological battle with the "internal enemy". What differentiates China from Russia was/is that the jews could not infiltrate China at the highest points of governmental power so easily as they could in Russia. They are trying to do it now through racemixing with the chinks, but I think the chinks are jew-aware more than Whites. Just as they have stayed on the sidelines of history and studied our race, strengths and weaknesses, mistakes and victories, now that their numbers are twice as higher than ours and their strength is considerable, they can take us on, or anybody else for that matter.
The welfare state was designed as an altruistic safety net by white people for white people. It is perfectly natural and racial socialist to help your own kind when they are sick, need help or cannot find work.
However because the wealthy and traitorous elites have not protected the nations, or its borders and sent all western industry to asia the West is now financially bleeding to death.
The first thing that will see the squeeze is the welfare state and health services. The wealthy will laugh at seeing the poor suffer and the presence of millions of racial aliens will kill off any vestiges of altruism left in society.
In short the Jews are building a darker, nastier, more selfish, crueller, competitive, extreme and violent world. It is my view they will regret this.
They will look back at the time the west was white as a golden age when they could peacefully live amongst and exploit the goyim easily.
the impoverished multi-culti mess they will leave behind will be riven with tribalism, anti semitism, intolerance and extremism that will in time reach them, prosecute and punish them once again.