#SSM Same Sex Marriage - VOTE NO - New Hate-Crime Laws

[Rev.Cambeul]

Due to the impending fag marriage vote, the Federal Government is creating a new range of Hate-Crime laws. Basically, if anyone feels vilified during the campaign, they'll get a load of cash.

Question: Who can be vilified?

According to the law, everyone is equal in all respects and everyone is protected - just like racial vilification law claims to be. However, fact is far different from the imposed fiction of feel-good laws. Like all Hate-Crime laws in practice, the politically correct cannot vilify White, Heterosexual Males. Only White people are racist, only men can be misogynist (women can never be misandrist), and in this argument, only gay-bi-trans-xyz can be offended due to sexual preferences. Straight/heterosexual people can be Homophobic, but not even the word (never mind the concept) Heterophobic is acknowledged, unless it is being used as a form of mockery against heterosexual people.

How this new law will work

Admitting that one intends to vote "NO" during the same-sex marriage campaign is considered by the "YES" faction to be an act of Homophobia. Therefore anyone admitting to intending to vote No or having voted No, has committed a Hate-Crime. You may be guilty of a Hate-Crime based on something you said, something you wrote, something you implied. You may be guilty of a Hate-Crime based on your actions, or something someone else has said or written on your behalf. It really doesn't matter, just as long as a "YES" campaigner feels vilified.

Note that the attorney general that is enacting these "Emergency" Hate-Crime Laws has frequently claimed that so-called Hate-Speech is not protected by Freedom of Speech Laws; and we've seen that the so-called Hate-Speech label can be thrown at anyone not part of the PC Crowd.

Therefore it is reasonable to assume that any person on the "NO" team that is genuinely vilified by proponents of the "YES" faction  will be told that offence and deemed vilification is all part of freedom of speech ... they will be told to grow a spine ... to build a bridge and get over it.

@Cailen.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0yLbF0BtZs4

Emergency laws to ban vilification, intimidation and threats in same-sex marriage campaign

Michael Koziol and James Massola | The Age | 12 September 2017

http://www.theage.com.au/federal-politics/political-news/emergency-laws-to-ban-vilification-intimidation-and-threats-in-samesex-marriage-campaign-20170912-gyfpkh.html?platform=hootsuite

Extract: Australians who feel vilified, intimidated or threatened by another person's conduct during the same-sex marriage campaign will have legal recourse under emergency laws being rushed through Parliament this week.

Civil penalties of up to $12,600 will apply, but any legal action for an alleged breach of the new law will have to be approved by Attorney-General George Brandis.

The special protections will end at the conclusion of the same-sex marriage postal survey in November.

"It will be unlawful to vilify, intimidate or threaten to harm a person either because of views they hold on the survey or in relation to their religious conviction, sexual orientation, gender identity or intersex status," a government spokesman said.

http://www.9news.com.au/national/2017/09/13/03/35/slim-majority-will-ensure-marriage-reform

[G.E.Imperium]

Essentially we are talking cultural Marxism, it's primary target being confused children. We have the same madness prevalent and promoted by perverts and freaks in the UK.

I actually feel sympathy for the victims, generally mentally confused, but they need psychiatric help rather than encouragement, it's promoters belong in concentration camps.

[Br.IanVonTurpie]

 http://mobile.abc.net.au/news/2017-09-04/same-sex-marriage-petition-against-doctor-pansy-lai-taken-down/8869260?pfmredir=sm

A Sydney doctor who became the subject of a petition to be deregistered after appearing in a same-sex marriage No Campaign advertisement says she has been physically threatened since the ad aired.

Dr Pansy Lai has told the ABC she and some staff at the medical clinic where she works had been threatened since she appeared in a Coalition for Marriage advertisement calling for a No vote in the upcoming same-sex marriage survey.

"There was one comment that says they were going to turn up at my practice and that I had better bring security," Dr Lai said.

She said receptionists at her clinic "had to cop some really terrible phone calls; people have been swearing at them and threatening physical harm".

As the founder of a group called Australian Chinese for Families, Dr Lai said others advocating for the existing definition of marriage were also worried.

"Chinese parents are telling me that they are fearful for what it means," she said.

"If the law changes, will parents still have the right to voice their concerns about the Safe Schools program? Would the same happen to them? Are they going to be laid off their government jobs or have their job registrations reviewed for voicing out their views on traditional marriage?"

'Anarcho-socialist' defends posting petition
Picture of man with long hair.
PHOTO Lev Lafayette calls himself an anarcho-socialist.

TWITTER: @LEV_LAFAYETTE
A petition, published on site CommunityRun, called for a review of Dr Lai's medical registration for appearing in the No promotional video and content on the Australian Chinese for Families site.

Lev Lafayette, a programming trainer at the University of Melbourne who describes himself on Twitter as an Anarcho-socialist, is the man behind the now-cancelled petition.

He defended the petition and the people signing it.

"As citizens, the people who have signed that petition are saying, 'hey, we have got a concern here that a medical professional ... has breached their own code of practice," Mr Lafayette said.

"We're just putting it forward. It's not up to us, it's up to them."

GetUp's website has removed petition
GetUp, who created the community petition platform, said the petition was removed after receiving dozens of complaints.

"Following the review, the petition was found to breach CommunityRun's terms and conditions and was taken down on Monday morning," a GetUp spokesman said.

Petitions listed on CommunityRun can be uploaded by anyone and are not run or endorsed by GetUp.

A GetUp spokesman said while the organisation was opposed to a same-sex marriage survey, it condemned personal attacks against individuals on either side of the campaign.

"GetUp does not support a petition targeting Dr Pansy Lai, which was uploaded over the weekend, nor did GetUp endorse or organise it," he said.

VIDEO 0:24
A No television advert ahead of the same-sex marriage survey
The first ad ahead of the same-sex marriage survey
ABC NEWS
AMA slams 'inappropriate' petition
The petition was addressed to the Australian Medical Association, which has criticised it as being inappropriate and concerning.

"Individuals should be able to express an opinion on a political matter, without being shouted down," AMA president Dr Michael Gannon said.

"Everyone's entitled to an opinion and to call for someone to have their livelihood taken away, which is effectively what medical deregistration would mean to a doctor, is utterly inappropriate."
Mr Gannon said the Medical Board of Australia, which is the registrational authority for doctors, would dismiss this complaint very quickly.

"Doctors, like other members of the community, are entitled to an opinion and that should be heard," Dr Gannon said.

A Coalition for Marriage spokeswoman condemned the now-removed petition.

"In seeking to ruin the career of a doctor who dares disagree with its agenda, the same-sex marriage lobby has shown, yet again, that it has no interest in freedom of speech," she said.

"The petition against Dr Lai is a threat not only to her, but to any others who might try to voice their opinion. The message is loud and clear: agree on same-sex marriage or else."

A petition, published on site CommunityRun, called for a review of Dr Lai's medical registration for appearing in the No promotional video and content on the Australian Chinese for Families site.

Lev Lafayette, a programming trainer at the University of Melbourne who describes himself on Twitter as an Anarcho-socialist, is the man behind the now-cancelled petition.

He defended the petition and the people signing it.

"As citizens, the people who have signed that petition are saying, 'hey, we have got a concern here that a medical professional ... has breached their own code of practice," Mr Lafayette said.

"We're just putting it forward. It's not up to us, it's up to them."

GetUp's website has removed petition
GetUp, who created the community petition platform, said the petition was removed after receiving dozens of complaints.

"Following the review, the petition was found to breach CommunityRun's terms and conditions and was taken down on Monday morning," a GetUp spokesman said.

Petitions listed on CommunityRun can be uploaded by anyone and are not run or endorsed by GetUp.

A GetUp spokesman said while the organisation was opposed to a same-sex marriage survey, it condemned personal attacks against individuals on either side of the campaign.

"GetUp does not support a petition targeting Dr Pansy Lai, which was uploaded over the weekend, nor did GetUp endorse or organise it," he said.

[Rev.Cambeul]

Same Sex Marriage - Just Say No

In the Gallery https://creativityalliance.com/forum/index.php?action=gallery;sa=view;id=2173

[Rev.Cambeul]

https://twitter.com/RaeleeBee/status/907890625332224000

[Rev.Cambeul]

SSM voting forms not secure.

According to MSM, it's easy to fraudulently duplicate SSM voting forms and pass them off as legit. The official government response: Sh...It happens.

SSM: ABS releases same-sex marriage postal survey form
http://www.abc.net.au/news/2017-09-11/abs-releases-same-sex-marriage-postal-survey-form/8893250

ABS warns Australians not to post same-sex marriage survey forms online
http://www.smh.com.au/federal-politics/political-news/abs-warns-australians-not-to-post-samesex-marriage-survey-forms-online-20170913-gygtuz.html

SSM postal survey envelopes reveal same-sex marriage responses under torch light, prompting privacy concerns
http://www.abc.net.au/news/2017-09-13/ssm-postal-survey-envelopes-reveal-responses-under-torch-light/8942876