Jewish Supremacists Lead Minorities Blocking Repeal of Hate Laws

[Rev.Cambeul]

Whoa, I had no idea Holocaust denial was illegal in Australia.

It's not illegal, but they will Zundel you here if they can. Typically, as happened with Doctor Frederick Toben, they will gather their money and lawyers, make a private application to the court to find your words and actions to be offensive to their Semitic sensibilities, and the court will guaranteed judge you to be guilty, judge you to be recalcitrant, judge your words to be a physical threat, hand down orders, fine and sentence you - all at the orders of some Jew that has a private grudge with you. In Australia, that's the leaders of the Executive Council of Australian Jewry - which comes under orders from the same old B'nai Brith bunch that rule every other Jewish Supremacist organisation in the world at the expense of the U.S. taxpayer.

These days, whenever they mention Doctor Toben in their libellous outpourings, they usually mention me as well. The reason they went after Doctor Toben privately through the courts and leave me alone, is because Doctor Toben had something to lose; while I have nothing. It can also be argued that Doctor Toben's publicly state views - like Zundel's - were his views, and his alone. And without him around, his compatriots would disappear completely. While I represent a religious organisation that the Jewish Supremacists denounce at every opportunity, but recognise that our Holy Books, recordings and other texts are legally less offensive than is their Torah - the First Testament of the Christian Bible. Their Jewish scripture actually calls variously for the conquest, extermination and enslavement of entire races of people opposed to Jews; while ours merely points out that the Jew is doing exactly that at this very moment to the White Race through lawfare, and that it is the Holy Duty of our Creed to resist the Jew on all fronts. Further, if the Jew and its JOG allies go one step further and cease to follow their own rules of law and order and persecution and murder of CREATORS becomes the order of the day, then we will fight back in what will be a Bloody Racial War. A RaHoWa that will begin with the deaths of the Rabbis at CREATOR hands. That is all part of our Creed and often used out of context against us, but it is something we will only do, if we have no choice other than to stand and be murdered as per Rabbinic order.

@Cailen.

[Br.IanVonTurpie]

Look what the Kikes did to Brenden O'Connell in Western Australia. This is a show of contempt!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S5CsmBYuFjg

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GbvlIICTRTE

[Rev.Cambeul]

Mainstream politician using our language? It's 04:27am in the morning ... Am I still asleep and caught in a dream?

Critics of push to reform 18C are racist, says Cory Bernardi

Sarah Martin | The Australian | 31 August 2016

http://www.theaustralian.com.au/national-affairs/critics-of-push-to-reform-18c-are-racist-says-cory-bernardi/news-story/ce67516f9020bcd22b530366a0e39da8

Extract: Liberal Cory Bernardi has hit out at critics of his push to remove restrictions on ­offensive and insulting speech, ­accusing some of being racist against white people, as he storms ahead with a renewed bid to change the Racial Discrimin­ation Act.

Rebelling against Malcolm Turnbull's call for MPs to focus on budget repair, the conservative South Australian senator will today present a bill to amend ­section 18C of the act, co-sponsored by 20 senators, including all but one of the Coalition's 14 upper house backbenchers.

He will also table a petition signed by 15,027 people to demonstrate it is a "bread and butter" issue for the conservative base.

"What I am hoping for is my colleagues and the public will inform themselves as fully as they possibly can about the dangers of section 18C and how ... by amending it we can protect free speech and also protect people from vilification and intimidation," Senator Bernardi told The Australian.

Crossbench senators Bob Day, David Leyonhjelm and Derryn Hinch and One Nation's four new senators are also backing the bill, prompting suggestions on social media the issue was being pursued by 20 "white" people.

Senator Bernardi, who this week leaves for a four-month placement at the UN, said the ­suggestion only white people supported the change was racist.

It "is basically telling the parliament that some laws can only be proposed by people of a particular colour skin. These people are ­offensive, they are insulting and they demonstrate everything that is wrong with section 18C and the grievance industry," he said. [more ...]

[Rev.Cambeul]

In a probably racist anti-White act ...

Human Rights Commission broke rules over race complaint

Hedley Thomas | The Australian | 1 September 2016

http://www.theaustralian.com.au/national-affairs/indigenous/human-right-commission-broke-rules-over-race-complaint/news-story/4205e68f9f1619dbcdf77b18d3dd71f2

A Freedom of Information disclosure to students accused of ­racism shows the Human Rights Commission did not follow its own guidelines before the complaint of (Aboriginal woman) Cindy Prior advanced to the Federal Circuit Court.

The commission's handbook has prescriptive procedures for complaints of racial hatred under section 18C of the Racial Discrimination Act, which is cited by Ms Prior, an indigenous former Queensland University of Technology staffer, in her $250,000 legal case against students for their Facebook posts.

The handbook cautions staff to "be careful to ensure the neutrality of your approach" when dealing with people who are the subject of such complaints, adding "no assumptions should be made about the validity of the complaint or views expressed as to its substance".

The person should "be provided with the opportunity to ­respond to the complaint in a co-operative, informal manner", and staff are required to treat the parties equally and to ensure they are ­notified and heard.

"In general this means that a (person who is the subject of a complaint) has the right to know of, and respond to, a complaint against him or her and a right to a fair and unbiased handling of the matter,'' the handbook says.

Under the heading "Possible early termination of a complaint", the handbook advises that in less serious cases the commission's staff should take additional steps to contact the accused person.

It says staff should recommend termination of a complaint if one of the grounds, such as a lack of substance, has been satisfied.

In the QUT case, three (White Australian) ­students — Calum Thwaites, Alex Wood and Jackson Powell — were accused by Ms Prior of racial hatred in a formal complaint to the commission in May 2014. But the commission failed for 14 months to tell them they were ­accused of a legal offence, racial vilification under section 18C. The students found out days before a compulsory conciliation conference in August last year.

Other documents released previously under FOI show that the commission had effectively excluded the students from correspondence and dealt instead with Ms Prior's legal team and QUT's staff and solicitors.

A file note by commission ­officer Ting Lim on July 28 last year states she advised the university's solicitor that QUT "has known about this complaint for over year ... it's not the fault of the commission that the QUT has waited a week before the (conciliation conference) to notify the students. If a student is notified and wants to attend next week, they will have to make time".

The students have described their alarm after eventually being told of the existence of the complaint shortly before the conciliation conference in Brisbane. They said they had no funds, no legal representation, and little time to prepare for the commission-run conference with Ms Prior and her legal team. When the conference failed to resolve the 18C complaint, Ms Prior's case went to the Federal Circuit Court as a damages claim for $250,000.

Mr Wood said he first became aware on July 31 last year of the complaint made 14 months earlier by Ms Prior when he read an email requiring him to attend the conference three days later on August 3.

The lawyers who have been acting for no fee for the students since early this year — Tony ­Morris QC and Michael Henry — accuse the commission of failing in its statutory duties and "recklessly" breaching the human rights of the students.

Commission president Gillian Triggs, who has rejected claims that the commission acted "disgracefully", has appointed Sydney barrister Angus Stewart SC to ­investigate the formal complaints filed by the students' lawyers.

[Rev.Cambeul]

Jewish Supremacist Masquerading as a Journalist Tells Why WHITE AUSTRALIANS Must be Subject to the Arbitrary Rules of 18C/Hate Crime Law

http://www.theaustralian.com.au/opinion/free-speech-warriors-are-missing-the-point-about-18c/news-story/bbe10592eb3a73dfd9c5d870b524f302

The Australian | 1 September 2016

Extract: The positive accomplishments of the law in the small number of cases that involved a more substantive decision include: directing a webmaster remove from his site volumes of material alleging that Jewish people created a myth of Nazi genocide to achieve financial and other gains; halting a woman from distributing huge volumes of material alleging every social ill was due to Jewish malevolence; requiring an online newspaper to moderate comments accusing Aboriginal Australians in general of "criminal behaviour" following the deaths of some Aboriginal juvenile offenders; requesting an apology and future safeguards from a political party that had published in its newspaper vicious material alleging Jewish people were corrupt and pornographers; sanctioning a lawyer who, on entering a court building, refused to be searched, abusively screaming at the security guard that he was a "Singaporean prick" and not welcome in Australia; and helping an Aboriginal woman who was subject to a constant stream of public racial abuse from a neighbouring family.

{SNIP}

The fact is that 18C and 18D have formed a vital pillar of successful Australian multiculturalism, helping maintain social harmony and cohesion and minimise hatred and hostility between groups.

Colin Rubenstein is executive director of the Australia/Israel & Jewish Affairs Council. He taught politics at Monash University and was a member of the National Multicultural Advisory Council.

[Rev.Cambeul]

Note: When contacted by Australian Creators, the Australian Human Rights Commission denied that it has any right to investigate complaints made by Creators, as the complaints were not related to denial of employment or otherwise job related issues, denial of service and refusal to obtain housing. However, the AHRC does investigate every tiddly little complaint by every money-hungry mud looking to profit at evil Whitey's expense. So understand that the AHRC is not a taxpayer funded government run body dedicated to equality - the AHRC is solely dedicated to the cultural genocide of White Australia.

@Cailen.



Time to drain 'human rights industry' swamp

Jennifer Oriel | The Australian | 7 November 2016

http://www.theaustralian.com.au/opinion/columnists/jennifer-oriel/time-to-drain-human-rights-industry-swamp/news-story/1debafb67eeb23437dfb17a8a5ff3ddc

Extract: With a national debt of $450 billion, a foreign debt over a trillion dollars and a bulging deficit, the Australian people cannot afford the vast system of activism swamping taxpayer-funded minority groups, media, academe and the law. To paraphrase Donald Trump, it's time to drain the swamp.

The AHRC is an activist organisation, the purpose of which has expired. It should have been retired after formal equality was introduced across Australian jurisdictions. The realisation of equality as a national condition is good for human rights, but bad for business. And human rights is a big, redundant business funded by taxpayers who are struggling to make ends meet. To justify their appalling waste of taxpayers' money, activists curate a culture of complaint in which citizens are grouped by state-designated "attributes" such as race or sex and encouraged to complain about perceived offence. Section 18C is the perfect tool to sow endless division and the culture of complaint that sustains the human rights industry.

The final reform needed is to replace current discrimination legislation with codified formal equality and reduce the protected attributes to people with disabilities, and primary carers for the disabled, the young and the elderly. We should support welfare for those genuinely in need and use it to assist fellow Australians find suitable employment. The AHRC and state discrimination commissions are fossils from an era where citizens were treated unequally before the law. Today, they promote new forms of inequality under the euphemism of affirmative action while silencing political dissidents under 18C. The AHRC has become a force for social discord and division. Let it go.