Discrimination Against Whites

[Maritz]

Every now and again we have some mud or liberal White who wants to tell us that Apartheid is to blame for all black failures. One of these failures is the poor performance of blacks when it comes to graduating from high school with a matric certificate. When faced with Logic ... these assholes fall out the bus.

The current matriculants of South Africa are about 18 or 19 years old. That means they were born after mandela was released from prison and all Apartheid laws have been abandoned. Since then blacks have enjoyed "Affirmative Action" and "Black Economic Empowerment" and many have become stinking rich from this blatant racist discrimination and blacks being advantaged in the work place. Blacks enjoy quota systems at universities that advantage them over Whites, coloureds and indians. When they are finished with university they get further advantaged when they apply for a job, because of AA and BEE. Every time they change jobs they get further advantaged through more AA and BEE ... yet blacks still lag behind the rest of the races in South Africa and will do so forever.

Blacks were not the only ones who were so called "disadvantaged" by Apartheid. Coloureds, indians and chinese were all "suffering" under Apartheid, yet the indians and chinese were some of the richest people in South Africa under "Evil Apartheid". Amazing don't you think ? The only ones who constantly claim to have been victimized were the useless nigger.

The ANC constantly wants to tell the world how Apartheid robbed blacks from their education. This is total and utter nonsense. We who grew up during Apartheid will tell you about thousands of schools built for blacks by the White Apartheid government. Universities for nignogs and coloureds were common for anyone who wanted to study further. One just needs to look around in SA today to see the many black and coloured academics, lawyers, doctors, etc that all got their education because of the wonderful Apartheid system, not inspite of it. Compared to the rest of Africa, South African blacks had the highest literacy and tertiary education rates on the continent, especially during the 1980's. Despite all the schools we Whites built for the nigger, they would burn it all down. They did not want the White man's education. They said it was because they had to learn Afrikaans - what bullshit !

I want to know what their excuse is today. None of todays black matriculants ever experienced Apartheid. Why do they not want to study ? Blacks today can attend any White school they wish for free. Buses are organised for them from the townships to school and back again. Even their school clothes are for free if they are too poor. Blacks today have NO EXCUSES.

Below is a report on the MEC of education in the Western Cape paying a surprise visit to two black schools in black townships who just happens to be the two worst performing schools of the province ... what does he find ... something that we have known for years. Blacks simply have no interest in studying and educating themselves. School is a place where you get together to find someone to bonk and where you can buy your choice of drug. That is the only reason the MEC found 19 matrics actually present at a school that should have around 120 matriculants.

http://www.iol.co.za/index.php?set_id=1&click_id=124&art_id=vn20091016131727503C300957

But that is not all ... when niggers fail matric on a massive scale, The ANC government just throws more White taxpayer's money at it ... A R135 million [$1=R7.35] in fact in the form of a "second chance remedial project" for useless blacks who keep on failing ... a second time ... a third time ... etc.

Blacks are a failed race. No amount of money thrown at them will ever bring them up to the standards of Whites. Evolution takes thousands of years. Blacks should be separated and allowed to evolve at a natural pace, if thats possible. They will be happy and we will be happy. Liberals commies should stop lying to blacks and telling them they are equal to us. They never have been and never will be. Blacks should just aspire to be the best Kaffirs they can ever be ... you know the type that still says "Baas"[Master" ... now that is a good Kaffir.

http://www.sowetan.co.za/News/Article.aspx?id=1080121#

[Maritz]

Afrikaners Not "Minorities" - Minorities Not Minorities Either 

Afrikaner minority-rights activists yesterday launched a determined verbal attack at the African Human Rights Day conference in Parktown - with Afrikaner intellectuals climbing into the draft report drawn up by ANC-officials for the UN Human Minority Rights Commission conference in Geneva on November 11. This event was heavily-censored by the SABC-news TV however, which merely reported the following :

"South Africa does not need a special dispensation to cater for indigenous groups and minorities as its Constitution protects and guarantees the cultural, linguistic and religious rights of all her people," the IEC "president" Pansy Tlakula told a meeting looking at minority rights. However, the often very angry, heated debate between the small number of Afrikaners and the black majority at this meeting - and which had led to this statement by Tlakula - was not reported by the SABC-TV at all. And even though they also interviewed Dr Dan Roodt, the Afrikaner intellectual who headed this highly-critical minority-delegation, the SABC-TV chose not to broadcast this interview thus far.

Yesterday's African Human Rights Day conference was called by the SA human rights commission to gain the stamp of approval for their concept report - however the Afrikaner intellectual delegation - comprised of Dr Pieter Duvenage, Dan Roodt, Louis Smuts and Andre Alkema, sharply criticised the submitted draft, saying that the Afrikaner delegation did not agree to its wording - and would be getting together with other Afrikaner groups to draw up their own "dissenting minority-opinion report" in time for submission to the November 11 2009 UN conference in Geneva, Switzerland.
At the start of the morning-session, while Dr Dan Roodt - the businessman and author who founded the activist Pro-Afrikaans Action Group [PRAAG] was holding a press conference outside the SABC-radio and TV station about the issue, Dr Duvenage was inside engaged in hot debates with delegates.

Stating his held viewpoint - as a leading member of the Afrikaner minority in the country - Duvenage said the South African state "can no longer be viewed as having any legitimacy because it cannot guarantee the safety of its citizens any longer". Moreover, he said - amidst loud and often very angry protestations from the black delegates - that "the presence of the Afrikaner minority was not even recognised by the SA State any longer".

This raised the ire of one featured black conference-speaker, Ms Colet Letlojane - who flew into Duvenhage`s claim with counter-accusations of "disloyalty towards the black majority which had forgiven him [Duvenage] for Apartheid"

After the morning session, the newly-appointed head of the SA Human Rights commission, "adv." Tseliso Thipanyane, was standing around amidst a large crowd of admirers and bystanders, and was heard to joke in a demeaning way about the Afrikaner-minority delegates, repeatedly chanting; "I want my Afrikaans, I want my Afrikaans" - to the huge amusement of bystanders.

"900 people killed in political violence during apartheid - but tens of thousands of Africaners have already been killed by the black majority after 1994 ..."

During the morning session, when the few Afrikaner delegates such as Duvenage were enduring verbal attacks in highly-emotional language by many other delegates, Dr Roodt also responded by saying that "he was pleased that Duvenage was forgiven for apartheid".

"However if one places this forgiveness towards Duvenage against the fact that 900 people were killed during political violence throughout the entire apartheid-period [1948-1994] in South Africa, while thus far some 750,000 people have already been murdered since 1994, amongst whom also were many tens of thousands of Afrikaners, Duvenhage should actually show forgiveness towards his accusers rather than the other way around, because "it's the vast black majority who are committing this horrific crimes," said Roodt.

This comment put the cat amongst the pigeons - with black delegates then attacking the very concept a "minority group". One official of the Justice department even claimed that the concept "minority group" was a "dynamic concept and that this doesn`t mean that South Africa was comprised of minorities ..."

During the afternoon-session, the chief editor of the Department of foreign affairs` human-rights and humanitarian affairs, Pitso Montwedi, also vehemently denied Dr Roodt's statistical submission that the official apartheid-era death-rate was 900 people, saying this was a "lie" . Dr Roodt then asked that "the true apartheid-era political death rates" be published, since these he had quoted had come directly from the SA Truth and Reconciliation Commission.[ ... set up by the commies themselves]

Many of the other black speakers also claimed that the concept of "minority rights" was born during apartheid, that South Africa now was one homogenous nation without any minorities.

Another government official also said that if minority groups joined the ruling party [i.e. the ANC] they could participate in politics.

Minorities in SA have no rights to influence political power

Dr Roodt responded to this by asking whether this official thus was "lodging a plea for a one-party state" with this invitation - to which this official responded that "minorities did not have any rights to influence political power nor have any political influence ..."

The ANC-executives at the conference then tried to defuse the debate about Afrikaner-minority rights by changing the subject altogether - namely to that of the "rights of non-heterosexual people" - submitting that this group should be viewed as a "minority group" and that this should be reflected in the concept-draft to the UN meeting on November 11.
Dr Roodt however continued the Afrikaner-rights debate, pointing to the example of the voting-districts` demarcation of the Pretoria municipality by Dr Michael Sutcluffe as a "prime example of discrimination and suppression of minority groups" where primarily Afrikaner-suburbs were cut up and added to black-majority-voter suburbs to guarantee an ANC-majority vote in those new voting districts.

This raised the ire of Mrs Nkaro Mateto, senior manager of the Independent Electoral Commission - who said that she was a member of this demarcation commission for the Pretoria region - and that the purpose of the voting-district demarcations had not been to "discriminate" against Afrikaners, but rather to "integrate" them.

Dr Roodt replied to Mrs Mateto`s claim by noting that in his view, "integration was just an euphemism for forced assimilation" :

"There are three ways to commit genocide," he said: [1] "through ethnic cleansing, for instance by driving Afrikaners from the country through a variety of laws barring Afrikaners [from public life]; [2] by forced assimilation and through violence.

And all of these elements already exist in South Africa [targeting the Afrikaner minority]."

Then the Human Rights Commission chairman angrily replied that, "as a Sotho whose ancestral lands were taken away before 1930 he, as a member of the black majority, was not prepared to make any kind of concessions to the civil rights of the Afrikaner minority." During the afternoon-session, the chief editor of the Department of foreign affairs` human-rights and humanitarian affairs, Pitso Montwedi, also denied Dr Roodt`s claim that the official apartheid-era death-rate was 900 people, saying this was "a lie" .

An Indian academic from the University of the Witwatersrand, "Prof" Ayesha Kajee and South African head of the International Human-rights exchange programme, then suffered an extraordinary anger-outburst, screaming that "hundreds of thousands of blacks were killed by Afrikaners during apartheid", and that "Dr Roodt can't establish fact from fiction."

Dr Roodt replied : "don't believe your own propaganda". 

Throughout the conference, all the Afrikaner delegates submitted point-by-point criticisms of the concept-report placed before the conference delegates for "final approval". This document would then be tabled as representative of the entire SA population`s opinion at the 11 November UN Human Rights Commission meeting in Geneva.

Roodt and Duvenage submitted to the meeting that they would be drawing up a minority-opinion report which would be tabled together with the official government version - and that they would be calling on all Afrikaner organisations to help draw up such a minority report - and which would be submitted to the 11 November meeting.

Dr Roodt concluded that "from this meeting it also becomes clear - judging from the recriminations and accusations flying amongst the delegates - that the issue of minority rights in South Africa is an explosive situation".

[Source : Praag.co.za]

[Maritz]

White Boy Stabbed Over "Racist" Hello

Vanderbijlpark - A racist but "good-natured" greeting between two school friends has led to one of them being stabbed by fellow pupils who took offence. The knife only barely missed the 16-year-old victim's heart. Two pupils from Carel de Wet Technical High School in Vanderbijlpark greeted each other by saying "Hello, my boertjie", "Hello, my kaffertjie" on Friday morning.

A third schoolboy, aged 15, took offence when he heard the two boys greeting each other this way and confronted Jeandré Kruger, a Grade 10 pupil, about the matter. "The boy [who took offence], a Grade 9 pupil, grabbed me by my shirt and yanked me around, so I hit my head against his head," said Jeandré. "The two boys have been greeting each other like that for ages and to them it`s a joke," said Johan Kruger, Jeandré`s father, on Monday.

According to Jeandré he was walking towards his parents` car after school on Monday, when the boy who had confronted him on Friday called him aside outside the school`s property. "He was alone, but he took out a knife and stabbed me," said Jeandré. "The next moment I could feel someone else stabbing me twice in my back". Jeandré collapsed to his knees and saw his attackers - four pupils from the same school - running away. He stood up and ran toward his parents, who were waiting in their car. They informed the school principal before taking their son to a local hospital, where he received stitches.

"The doctor said Jeandré was lucky that the knife didn`t touch his heart or lungs," said Johan. "My son could have been dead if they stabbed him a few centimetres lower in the chest," said his mother, Yolanda Kruger. Johan says he has "no problem with race or skin colour", but he does have a problem with the actions of criminals. The parents will meet with the school principal, Gawie Richter, on Tuesday to discuss the matter further. "I just hope the guilty ones are punished," said Jeandré. According to Inspector Kinnie Steyn, the incident is being investigated by the Vanderbijlpark police.



[Source : Beeld]

[Maritz]

Racial Lunacy In The SA Police

In November 2006 the South African Police Service adopted an "Employment Equity Plan" for the period from 2007 to 2010. The document made clear that the overriding goal of the police's top brass was ensuring that the institution reflected, at all levels, 'the racial proportions of the national population'.It boasted that "stringent measures" had already been put in place to ensure compliance, by senior management, with these "numeric targets" in recruitment, promotions and appointments. And, it mooted the possibility of re-introducing "severance packages" to accelerate the clearing out of racial minorities from the organisation.

The document embodied the racial lunacy of the Mbeki-era. Crime was rampant. South Africans were living in a state of fear. The police force was crippled by a shortage of expertise. Yet in the midst of all this, the SAPS leadership remained obsessed only with the pursuit of an odious racial ideal. Recently, the Solidarity trade union launched a new series of legal challenges against a number of incidents of racial discrimination that resulted from this policy. In almost all of the cases, the union states, the police leadership preferred to keep positions vacant rather than appoint qualified White applicants to fill them.

These cases are designed to test the legality of certain extreme forms of race-based 'affirmative action.' They may also succeed in highlighting the ongoing personal and institutional costs of racial discrimination and exclusion. The first of them was heard in the Johannesburg Labour Court last week. Captain Renate Barnard was recommended twice for promotion in 2005 and 2006 -- but her promotion was personally blocked by the then-national commissioner of police, Jackie Selebi.

Testifying on behalf of the SAPS Senior Superintendent Johannes Phetolo Ramothoka said that Selebi "wanted to ensure that all units" adhered to the "equity plans" of the organisation. "White females were already over-represented by five at salary level nine" he stated, "so her appointment would have meant an over representivity of White females on that level."

In turn, Barnard broke down in tears as she testified about how she found all avenues of promotion closed to her. She told the court that all she ever wanted to do was serve in the police, and was totally committed to her work. "I want to ask management, what must I do more to get a promotion ? I sacrificed my family to do my job properly. I am a top performer."

It seems that the racial policies of the SAPS may well have served as a cover for other agendas. It was suggested in court that the (former terrorist MK`s ?) soldiers redeployed from the SANDF to the SAPS in 2004 and 2005 - after a twelve week conversion course - have subsequently received preference in promotions.

Barnard testified that members of the police who had joined from the defence force were all now superintendents or senior superintendents. She and many other career police officers meanwhile - both White and black - 'remained stuck at the rank of captain.' Selebi's refusal to promote experienced and committed police officers also stands in marked contrast to his enjoyment, or so it is alleged in his corruption trial, of the company of rich White crooks.

This then is an important story, and a very revealing one. One cannot understand the institutional rot that set in during the Mbeki period without reference to the racial obsessions, and all the attendant pathologies, of that era. The success or failure of the new Zuma administration will depend, to a significant degree, on whether it can move away from them.

The story has also been extensively reported on in the English-language South African press, and no journalist could be unaware of it. Why then, has it received so little coverage in the foreign media ? There appears to be a deep reluctance by foreign correspondents to report on cases of discrimination against racial minorities in Southern Africa. One possible reason for this is that a disturbing number of Western intellectuals regard such measures as fully justified even when it crosses over, as it did in Zimbabwe, into outright persecution.

In its report on Solidarity's press conference Reuters, for one, took it upon itself to try and rationalise away the racial policies of the SAPS.

The Reuters handbook states that "As Reuters journalists, we never identify with any side in an issue, a conflict or a dispute" and that "Reuters journalists do not express their opinions in news stories." Thus, its reports will often qualify a statement of the blindingly obvious as being the expression of the view of one side or the other. Reuters' reports on Zimbabwe, for example, commonly state that "critics" blame the economic collapse in that country on Zanu-PF policies such as the "seizures of White-owned farms."

In its report on the initial Solidarity announcement, however, this principle was thrown out the window. Reuters simply regurgitated, as unquestionable fact, two stock claims of African nationalist propaganda. The article stated that (a) the police's "affirmative action quotas" were "established to address the wrongs of Apartheid"; and (b) that the "legacy" of White minority rule "can still be seen, with "Whites continuing to occupy a disproportionately large number of senior positions in government and the private sector." [ ... because they are better qualified you moron]

But while many Western journalists and commissioning editors may instinctively support 'affirmative action quotas' in South Africa this does not fully explain the deep aversion to publishing stories on the consequences. American and British readers may be delighted (or appalled) at the way Renate Barnard was treated, but why keep them in the dark about this matter ?

The problem is perhaps that most left-leaning Western intellectuals regard opposition to racism as central to their sense of self. This principle has often co-existed with a complete identification with the cause of black African liberation. It is in the maltreatment of Africa's racial minorities by newly ascendant black nationalist regimes that these two core beliefs collide. The honest response would be to acknowledge this clash, and weigh the one belief against the other.

Instead, the usual pattern is for such intellectuals to wage an ideological war of position against this discomforting reality. The existence of discrimination is ignored or denied. When it can not be denied it is euphemised. When it can no longer be euphemised it is rationalised. And when it can no longer be rationalised that minority's moral claim to equal treatment is aggressively derided.

It is a great pity that the West has chosen to turn a blind eye in the way that it has. Some of the worst elements in our society take great comfort from that fact. http://www.politicsweb.co.za/politicsweb/view/politicsweb/en/page72308?oid=152114&sn=Marketingweb_detail

[MarkCook]

Great posts  Rev. Maritz !