No User is in Racial Loyalty Chat


Latest Posts ... Who's in the Chat ... Subscribe/Unsubscribe to R.L. News Email Update

Recent Posts

Shoutbox

Hidden to Guests

Hidden to Guests

12 June 2019 at 09:44
Hidden to Guests

Hidden to Guests

02 June 2019 at 11:11
Chat has been updated and sounds are now working in HTML5!

https://creativityalliance.com/forum/chat
Hidden to Guests

Hidden to Guests

01 June 2019 at 23:01
Hidden to Guests

Hidden to Guests

28 May 2019 at 00:12
Hidden to Guests

Hidden to Guests

25 May 2019 at 09:06
Hidden to Guests

Hidden to Guests

19 May 2019 at 22:01
Check out my post about the Flyers! I'm willing to make them for anyone here. Message me. 8)

https://creativityalliance.com/forum/index.php/topic,11337.0.html
Hidden to Guests

Hidden to Guests

23 April 2019 at 06:32
Theology of Hate: Creativity's History



All images used in the lecture were stolen from us/C.A.
Hidden to Guests

Hidden to Guests

20 April 2019 at 06:08
Hidden to Guests

Hidden to Guests

18 April 2019 at 19:03
Hidden to Guests

Hidden to Guests

16 March 2019 at 14:36

R.L. Newsletter

N.A. Radio

Author Topic: 2009-07-30 Making a Complaint against the MSM

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Hidden to Guests

  • Church Administrator, Creativity Alliance
  • Administrator
  • Posts: 6,290
  • Total Likes: 852
  • The Church of Creativity South Australia
      • Hidden to Guests
      • My Awakening as a White Racial Loyalist
2009-07-30 Making a Complaint against the MSM
« on: 08 August 2009 at 08:37 »
Australian Press Council Complaints Form

http://www.presscouncil.org.au/pcsite/complaints/compform.html

Re, http://www.thepunch.com.au/articles/If-the-sheet-fits-wear-it-white-supremacy-is-like-so-passe

Our Copy: https://creativityalliance.com/forum/index.php?topic=2595.0

Quote (selected)
The article is insulting to the religion of Creativity and specifically names me, Cailen Cambeul, in the context of the article. It falsely leads the reader to believe that all adherents of Creativity are prone to committing violence and murder with the insinuation that I personally have a criminal history to which the author only alludes to; that the religion of Creativity consists entirely of uneducated, illiterate adolescents, who are outcasts from society; that the amount of adherents to Creativity within Australia are no more than a few who individuals who gather together to something "to do with all their hate, ...." The author also refers to the religion of Creativity as "bizarre" which together with the preceding and final paragraphs of the article pertaining to Creativity, nullifies the rights of Creators to be accepted as a legitimate religious body. All of which is born out by abuse received by Creators in the form of email, abusive phone calls and face to face encounters as a result of the article.

Furthermore, although I did submit a comment to the article and made reference to my "right of reply," my comment was rejected. As such, I personally, my fellow Creators and the religion of Creativity as a whole, have been vilified by the author without even the right to reply.

The entire of the article pertaining to myself, Creators and Creativity, which consists of the first sixteen paragraphs of the article, is malicious, libellous vilification of a legitimate religious body. The article contains no background information or facts, and as such, there is no balance to the article. It consists entirely of the author's opinions encouraging ridicule and malfeasance by readers towards myself and other adherents of the religion of Creativity.

This sort of treatment might be appropriate for politicians and film stars who have abrogated many of their rights to privacy by the very nature of their profession, however,


E. Principles Breached
Looking at the Statement of Principles, or the print media's Privacy Standards, do you consider that any of the principles has been breached in this case? If so, write the number/s, indicating which principle, in this space.
Quote (selected)
Statement of Principles: 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8.
Privacy Standards: 1, 2, 6, 7.

Quote (selected)
Statement of Principles

1. Publications should take reasonable steps to ensure reports are accurate, fair and balanced. They should not deliberately mislead or misinform readers either by omission or commission.

2. Where it is established that a serious inaccuracy has been published, a publication should promptly correct the error, giving the correction due prominence.
 
3. Where individuals or groups are a major focus of news reports or commentary, the publication should ensure fairness and balance in the original article. Failing that, it should provide a reasonable and swift opportunity for a balancing response in an appropriate section of the publication.
 
4. News and comment should be presented honestly and fairly, and with respect for the privacy and sensibilities of individuals. However, the right to privacy is not to be interpreted as preventing publication of matters of public record or obvious or significant public interest. Rumour and unconfirmed reports should be identified as such.
 
5. Information obtained by dishonest or unfair means, or the publication of which would involve a breach of confidence, should not be published unless there is an over-riding public interest.
 
6. Publications are free to advocate their own views and publish the bylined opinions of others, as long as readers can recognise what is fact and what is opinion. Relevant facts should not be misrepresented or suppressed, headlines and captions should fairly reflect the tenor of an article and readers should be advised of any manipulation of images and potential conflicts of interest.
 
7.Publications have a wide discretion in publishing material, but they should balance the public interest with the sensibilities of their readers, particularly when the material, such as photographs, could reasonably be expected to cause offence.
 
8. Publications should not place any gratuitous emphasis on the race, religion, nationality, colour, country of origin, gender, sexual orientation, marital status, disability, illness, or age of an individual or group. Where it is relevant and in the public interest, publications may report and express opinions in these areas.
 
9. Where the Council issues an adjudication, the publication concerned should publish the adjudication, promptly and with due prominence.

Quote (selected)
Privacy Standards

1. Collection of personal information

In gathering news, journalists should seek personal information only in the public interest.

In doing so, journalists should not unduly intrude on the privacy of individuals and should show respect for the dignity and sensitivity of people encountered in the course of gathering news.

In accordance with Principle 4 of the Council's Statement of Principles, news obtained by unfair or dishonest means should not be published unless there is an overriding public interest. Generally, journalists should identify themselves as such. However, journalists and photographers may at times need to operate surreptitiously to expose crime, significantly anti-social conduct, public deception or some other matter in the public interest.

Public figures necessarily sacrifice their right to privacy, where public scrutiny is in the public interest. However, public figures do not forfeit their right to privacy altogether. Intrusion into their right to privacy must be related to their public duties or activities.

2. Use and disclosure of personal information

Personal information gathered by journalists and photographers should only be used for the purpose for which it was intended.

A person who supplies personal information should have a reasonable expectation that it will be used for the purpose for which it was collected.

Some personal information, such as addresses or other identifying details, may enable others to intrude on the privacy and safety of individuals who are the subject of news coverage, and their families. To the extent lawful and practicable, a media organisation should only disclose sufficient personal information to identify the persons being reported in the news, so that these risks can be reasonably avoided.

3. Quality of personal information

A media organisation should take reasonable steps to ensure that the personal information it collects is accurate, complete and up-to-date.

4. Security of personal information

A media organisation should take reasonable steps to ensure that the personal information it holds is protected from misuse, loss, or unauthorised access.

5. Anonymity of sources

All persons who provide information to media organisations are entitled to seek anonymity. The identity of confidential sources should not be revealed, and where it is lawful and practicable, a media organisation should ensure that any personal information which it maintains derived from such sources does not identify the source.

6. Correction, fairness and balance

In accordance with Principle 8 of the Council's Statement of Principles, where individuals are singled out for criticism, the publication should ensure fairness and balance in the original article. Failing that, the media organisation should provide a reasonable and swift opportunity for a balancing response in the appropriate section of the publication.

A media organisation should make amends for publishing any personal information that is found to be harmfully inaccurate, in accordance with Principle 2 of the Council's Statement of Principles. The media organisation should also take steps to correct any of its records containing that personal information, so as to avoid a harmful inaccuracy being repeated.

7. Sensitive personal information

In accordance with Principle 7 of the Council's Statement of Principles, media organisations should not place any gratuitous emphasis on the categories of sensitive personal information listed in Principle 7, except where it is relevant and in the public interest to report and express opinions in these areas.

Members of the public caught up in newsworthy events should not be exploited. A victim or bereaved person has the right to refuse or terminate an interview or photographic session at any time.

Unless otherwise restricted by law or court order, open court hearings are matters of public record and can be reported by the press. Such reports need to be fair and balanced. They should not identify relatives or friends of people accused or convicted of crime unless the reference to them is necessary for the full, fair and accurate reporting of the crime or subsequent legal proceedings.

8. Complaints

The Council will receive and deal with complaints (see on-line complaint form) from person or persons affected about possible breaches of these Standards in the same way as it receives and deals with complaints about possible breaches of its Statement of Principles. Where the Council issues an adjudication in relation to these Standards, the publication concerned must prominently print the adjudication.

We shall see what and if any good this complaint does. I suggest that whenever we are libelled by the media, we flood the appropriate offices with complaints. It wont have the same impact as winning a court case, but it might encourage some journalists or editors to ensure that at least the truth - although with a hateful bent - is printed about us.

Cailen.
Noli Nothis Permittere Te Terere
The only way to prevent 1984 is 2323

Reverend Cailen Cambeul, P.M.E.
Church Administrator, Creativity Alliance
Church of Creativity South Australia
P.O. Box 420, Oaklands Park, SA, Australia, 5046

Email: Admin@creativityalliance.com
Business: https://CreativeITworld.com | Cailen@creativeitworld.com
Find me on Gab: @CailenCambeul

Creator Flags, the Holybooks of Creativity, Shirts & More ...
See https://CreativityStorefront.com


"In the beginning of a change, the patriot is a scarce man, brave, hated, and scorned. When his cause succeeds, the timid join him, for then it costs nothing to be a patriot." Mark Twain.


Hidden to Guests

  • Church Administrator, Creativity Alliance
  • Administrator
  • Posts: 6,290
  • Total Likes: 852
  • The Church of Creativity South Australia
      • Hidden to Guests
      • My Awakening as a White Racial Loyalist
Re: 2009-07-30 Making a Complaint against the MSM
« Reply #1 on: 22 September 2009 at 01:40 »
Dear Cailen Cambuel,

Copied below is thepunch's response to your complaint.

At this stage you may elect to let the matter rest if you have been satisfied by the response.  However, if you remain discontented you may ask that the complaint be examined first by the Complaints Committee and then by the full Council.

Would you please advise this office, by 8 October, whether or not you are prepared to let the matter rest.  If not, I will set down the complaint for the first Complaints Committee meeting (see our complaints procedure on page 12, point 5) at which time is available.

Yours sincerely,


Deb Kirkman, Case Manager, Australian Press Council


"I have read Mr Cambuel's complaint and re-read Tory Shepherd's column and am not prepared to apologise, for three reasons. The first is that the "religion" of creativity to which Mr Cambuel refers is not a recognised religion at all, and this part of his complaint is largely incomprehensible. Second, the punch is an opinion website and Tory is entitled to form her own view, especially when it is framed around Mr Cambuel's quite candid description of himself as a racist. Third, our website is as a matter of principle not prepared to apologise to a white supremacist organisation."
Dave Penberthy


[FYI: http://www.thepunch.com.au/author-bios/david-penberthy]

Noli Nothis Permittere Te Terere
The only way to prevent 1984 is 2323

Reverend Cailen Cambeul, P.M.E.
Church Administrator, Creativity Alliance
Church of Creativity South Australia
P.O. Box 420, Oaklands Park, SA, Australia, 5046

Email: Admin@creativityalliance.com
Business: https://CreativeITworld.com | Cailen@creativeitworld.com
Find me on Gab: @CailenCambeul

Creator Flags, the Holybooks of Creativity, Shirts & More ...
See https://CreativityStorefront.com


"In the beginning of a change, the patriot is a scarce man, brave, hated, and scorned. When his cause succeeds, the timid join him, for then it costs nothing to be a patriot." Mark Twain.


Hidden to Guests

  • Church Administrator, Creativity Alliance
  • Administrator
  • Posts: 6,290
  • Total Likes: 852
  • The Church of Creativity South Australia
      • Hidden to Guests
      • My Awakening as a White Racial Loyalist
Re: 2009-07-30 Making a Complaint against the MSM
« Reply #2 on: 22 September 2009 at 04:46 »
 To Deb Kirkman, Case Manager, Australian Press Council,

 Re: The Punch.

Thank you for your email. As a leading representative of Creativity in Australia, I am obliged to continue with this matter and ask that the complaint be examined first by the Complaints Committee, and then if need be, by the full Council.

The response from Mr David Penberthy brings up three matters which need to be addressed.

The first is that not only is The Punch refusing to report the facts, but Punch writers are also twisting the facts to produce a political slant to many, if not all news stories. If a Punch writer happened to pen an article about an Aboriginal Activist who's ambition was to deport or kill people of European origin from Australia, that person would be described as an Aboriginal Rights Activist, or at the very most, a Black Separatist (as Louis Farrakhan - leader of the Nation of Islam - is commonly referred to), but never as a Black supremacist. This example happened on ABC radio, Triple J, live on air in 1992. This is without doubt a discriminatory style of reporting that should not be allowed, especially when the religious group in question, such as Creativity, is clearly not a "supremacist organisation." At the very least, we may be described as separatists in the same vein as Louis Farrakhan and Australian Indigenous Sovereignty groups.

According to societal standards and beliefs prevalent in modern Australian society, supremacism is the belief that a particular race, religion, gender, species, belief system or culture is superior to others and entitles those who identify with it to dominate, control or rule those who do not. To make it clear, adherents of Creativity do not wish to dominate, control or rule over anybody. By our own and Australian cultural definition, Creators are not supremacists.

From the founder of our beloved religion, Ben Klassen - Racial Loyalty, Issue 4, Fundamental Differences:

I have said it time and time again: CREATIVITY defies classification into any present categories of racial, political, or religious movements. It is not similar to, or a copy of any other movement, past or present. It is not a re-tread of Hitler's Nazi movement, nor are we "Neo-Nazis." It is not similar to, or affiliated with, any of the [Ku Klux] Klans. It is not a White Supremacy group, and we will clearly explain why not in the following discourse.

First of all, we want to make this point crystal clear: we are unique, in a class all by ourselves, a movement, a philosophy and a religion such as the White Race, unfortunately, has never had in all its history. Since it is extremely important to keep re-emphasizing that we Creators are in a class by ourselves, let us first brush aside some of the lesser comparisons before we come to the crux of our article. We are not a White Supremacist movement such as most liberal newspaper reporters neatly and quickly like to box us into. As I understand White Supremacy, it historically has represented the White Race as the ruling power over an inferior race, such as the British in India for two centuries, or the White masters owning, controlling and exploiting their Inferior black slaves, such as the plantation owners of the antebellum South. These two are only a meager example of hundreds, or thousands of other situations where the White Man was the lord and master, governing, controlling, working and lording it over some group or groups ....


Secondly and more importantly, in June of 2002, Creativity was legally recognised as a religion under United States law in the United States District Court, Eastern District of Wisconsin (Case No. 01-C-0162). (Full court transcript available at http://rahowanow.com/Legal-20020603-Religion-CreativityLegalReligion.pdf.) This means that under various international treaties to which the United States and Australia are signatories of, Creativity is a religion and adherents of Creativity have the right to live free from religious persecution with the full protection of Australian law.

From the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights - International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights:

Article 26 of the ICCPR states that '.the law shall prohibit any discrimination and guarantee all persons equal and effective protection against discrimination on any ground'. The United Nations Human Rights Committee (established under the ICCPR) has defined discrimination as

[A]ny distinction, exclusion, restriction or preference.which had the purpose or effect of nullifying or impairing the recognition, enjoyment or exercise, by all persons, on an equal footing, of all rights and freedoms.[5]

Article 2(1) of the ICCPR states:

Each State Party .undertakes to respect and to ensure to all individuals within its territory.the rights recognized in the present covenant, without distinction of any kind, such as race, colour, sex, language, religion, political or other opinion, national or social origin, property, birth or other status.

Article 2(2) and 2(3) require that legislation 'give effect to the rights recognized in the present Covenant' and that legislation providing for equal opportunity must be enforceable by 'such legislative or other measures as may be necessary to give effect to the rights.' and that 'any person whose rights or freedoms as herein recognized are violated shall have an effective remedy.'
http://www2.ohchr.org/english/law/ccpr.htm


Finally, The Punch is not an opinion site as stated by Mr Penberthy. The Punch is part of the media conglomerate owned by Rupert Murdoch, which includes the Adelaide Advertiser, and Ms Tory Shepherd is an acknowledged employee of the Adelaide Advertiser. So-called opinions, including MS Shepherd's which are to be found on The Punch website are accepted by the general public as genuine news articles that fall under the category of acceptable journalistic standards, which therefore negates any claim to pure opinion. This means that The Punch must be held accountable for articles by its writers, and not used as a platform for biased attacks on the religious and political beliefs of people that The Punch's writers clearly feel contempt for.

It is clear that Mr Penberthy believes that my own description of myself as a racist automatically denies me the right to fair and honest treatment by the media, and in particularly, The Punch. Again, this is obviously not the treatment that would befall an Aboriginal Rights Activist, who (might even be an adherent of a local indigenous religion) understandably loves the people of his own race above all people in this world, and is undoubtedly a racist, yet retains the legal right to a fair-go in the media. Am I such that I abrogate all rights to religious freedom and the right to political dissention simply because I am a White man of European descent?

Yours Sincerely,

Cailen Cambeul.
Noli Nothis Permittere Te Terere
The only way to prevent 1984 is 2323

Reverend Cailen Cambeul, P.M.E.
Church Administrator, Creativity Alliance
Church of Creativity South Australia
P.O. Box 420, Oaklands Park, SA, Australia, 5046

Email: Admin@creativityalliance.com
Business: https://CreativeITworld.com | Cailen@creativeitworld.com
Find me on Gab: @CailenCambeul

Creator Flags, the Holybooks of Creativity, Shirts & More ...
See https://CreativityStorefront.com


"In the beginning of a change, the patriot is a scarce man, brave, hated, and scorned. When his cause succeeds, the timid join him, for then it costs nothing to be a patriot." Mark Twain.


Hidden to Guests

  • Liaison to South Africa
  • Friend of Creativity
  • Posts: 552
  • Total Likes: 41
  • Die Kerk Van Die Skepper Suid Afrika
      • Hidden to Guests
      • Kerk Van Die Skepper Suid Afrika
Re: 2009-07-30 Making a Complaint against the MSM
« Reply #3 on: 22 September 2009 at 17:37 »
"With each new site, I was mentally preparing myself to be outraged, appalled. Filled with a towering sense of injustice" - I wonder what that looks like !  ;D

"But the really, really scary buggers are the slick, sly ones trotting out well-rehearsed arguments about limiting immigration and stopping the formation of ghettoes and talking about floods of boat people coming" - Why would these be the "scary buggers" ?  ???

Just reading the comments on her posts, you can see that this liberal does not know what she is talking about with a few people hammering her. Talking to a liberal, or xtian is like being in a ass-kicking contest and having only one leg. I try and ignore them, they just make me see red ... other times I cant help myself and get dragged into their illogics.

So we are racist ... so what ? Like Klaasen said : "Yes, we are proud to be racists. Yes, we are prejudiced in favour of the White Race at all times, in all things. Only we call this racial loyalty, and anyone who is not loyal to the White Race we designate as a despicable traitor to his or her own race". A racist is nothing but racial awareness, and only an idiot or moron would not be racist ... would not be racially aware ... how could you not be racially aware ? Firstly you have to be colour blind, and secondly, you have to be brain damaged.

These idiots think the term "racist" means : Whitey killing nignog, mudslum or kike - this is not the work of a racist but a murderer. They twist the term and use it incorrectly. A racist puts his race first in all things, unless the person is a race traitor. Normally these liberals are married to a mud and for this reason cant stand racists and further believe that only Whitey is racist ... never nignog, etc.
"We go back to the basic Laws of Nature : Take Care of Your Own, Love your Own. Hate your Enemies, Destroy your Enemies. The Law of Survival of your own kind is the Highest Law of Nature and Transcends All Others" - Ben Klassen

Website: https://rahowadirectory.com/sacreativity
Email: SouthAfrica@creativityalliance.com

Hidden to Guests

  • Church Administrator, Creativity Alliance
  • Administrator
  • Posts: 6,290
  • Total Likes: 852
  • The Church of Creativity South Australia
      • Hidden to Guests
      • My Awakening as a White Racial Loyalist
Re: 2009-07-30 Making a Complaint against the MSM
« Reply #4 on: 25 September 2009 at 02:27 »
Dear Mr Cambuel


Further to your email dated September 22 regarding your complaint against the punch, they have no further comment to make. The complaint has been referred to the 21 October meeting of the Complaints Committee.


The meeting will take place in our office in Sydney and will commence at 2.30pm.


Attached is a copy of the guidelines on Complaints Committee meetings.  Would you kindly let me know if you will be attending either in person or via tele-conference.  If the latter could you please advise of an appropriate telephone number you can be contacted on.


Yours sincerely,


Andrea Hart
Assistant to the Executive Secretary


AUSTRALIAN PRESS COUNCIL
Guidelines on attending the Complaints Committee

1.   It is desirable for both the complainant and the publication to attend the meeting of the Complaints Committee where the complaint will be considered. If personal attendance is not convenient or feasible, the Council expects that either or both of the parties, as necessary, will make themselves available by teleconference.

2.   You will be invited to the next available meeting of the committee. The Executive Secretary will tell you in good time when and where this is scheduled. Normally the committee meets in Sydney. Sometimes the committee visits other centres. Alternatively, and less frequently, an assessment panel may be convened or an assessor appointed. (No guarantee can be made that a meeting will be held in a location nominated by either party.)

3.   Discussions of complaints by the committee are informal.

4.   Legal representation is not allowed. However, by arrangement with the Executive Secretary, a party may attend with a supportive friend or friends, or, if s/he cannot attend, arrange to send someone else.

5.   No new material will be admitted or may be tabled.

6.   The discussion opens with the complainant and publication representative being introduced to the committee. The Chair normally then invites the complainant, and the publication representative, in order, if either wishes, to briefly summarise the main points of the complaint. The committee will have read the file carefully, so it is best to speak directly to the point. No more than five minutes is allowed for opening comments by each party. It is usually better for complainants and respondents to speak to committee members informally than to read prepared statements.

7.   The Chair then invites members of the committee in turn to ask any questions they think relevant to the issues in the complaint. Answers should be directed to the committee, not to the other party.

8.   After this discussion is concluded, the publication representative and the complainant are able, if either wishes, to sum up their case or make any clarifying comments, each to speak for no more than two minutes.

9.   After the parties leave, the committee drafts an adjudication that it recommends to the Council, which usually meets the next day.
Noli Nothis Permittere Te Terere
The only way to prevent 1984 is 2323

Reverend Cailen Cambeul, P.M.E.
Church Administrator, Creativity Alliance
Church of Creativity South Australia
P.O. Box 420, Oaklands Park, SA, Australia, 5046

Email: Admin@creativityalliance.com
Business: https://CreativeITworld.com | Cailen@creativeitworld.com
Find me on Gab: @CailenCambeul

Creator Flags, the Holybooks of Creativity, Shirts & More ...
See https://CreativityStorefront.com


"In the beginning of a change, the patriot is a scarce man, brave, hated, and scorned. When his cause succeeds, the timid join him, for then it costs nothing to be a patriot." Mark Twain.


 

2009-01-28 Forgotten Terror Threats—American Racists and Neo-Nazis

Started by Hidden to GuestsBoard Creativity in the News

Replies: 3
Popularity: 4080
Last post 03 September 2012 at 22:34
by Hidden to Guests
The Jew-owned MSM will have a field day with this one

Started by Hidden to GuestsBoard General News

Replies: 1
Popularity: 2955
Last post 05 April 2009 at 18:31
by Hidden to Guests
Star Trek - 2009 Movie

Started by Hidden to GuestsBoard General Jabber

Replies: 5
Popularity: 2285
Last post 21 December 2009 at 16:31
by Hidden to Guests
2009-07-30 If the sheet fits wear it (Australia)

Started by Hidden to GuestsBoard Creativity in the News

Replies: 11
Popularity: 8161
Last post 03 March 2012 at 01:17
by Hidden to Guests
2009-00-00 Lucky me, I get a mention from Tel Aviv University (Israel)

Started by Hidden to GuestsBoard Creativity in the News

Replies: 2
Popularity: 2908
Last post 02 December 2009 at 06:33
by Hidden to Guests



Legal Notices
Due to a 2003 CE decision in the US 7th Circuit Court Of Appeals, the name “Church of the Creator” is the trademarked property of a Christian entity known as TE-TA-MA Truth Foundation-Family of URI®. Use of the name “Church of the Creator” in any context is historical, and is presented for educational purposes only. The Church of Creativity makes no attempt to assume or supersede the trademark. Trademark remains with the trademark holder. [More ...]
 
The Church of Creativity is a Professional, Non-Violent, Progressive Pro-White Religion. We promote White Civil Rights, White Self-Determination, and White Liberation via 100% legal activism. We do not promote, tolerate nor incite illegal activity. [More ...]