World Cup 2010

[Albert]

Interesting Article from the UK's Daily Mail. Some truth getting out at last.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/home/moslive/article-1192088/South-Africa-World-Cup-2010--shootings-started.html

[Maritz]

This training have been going way before `94. After the commies took away the commando structures protecting farmers, people have been training themselves, forming their own commandos. Unfortunately White farmers, especially the elderly, are still being slaughtered - just another method of getting Whites from the land, similar to what happened in Rhodesia, and most probably the same animals. While ZOG is brainwashing the youth ... the Apartheid era Whites are being targeted. As the killings continue, militancy is gathering speed ... 

[Maritz]

South Africa's World Cup dry run has been hit by a theft at the Egyptian team hotel in Johannesburg.
Local police are investigating the theft of some US$2,400 from the rooms of five unnamed players. The cash was taken while the Pharaohs were beating World Cup winners Italy 1-0 on Thursday in a Confederations Cup group match. The Egyptian delegation had been staying at Johannesburg's Protea Wanderers Hotel.

"Five players have reported a case of theft, with the total sums lost amounting to US$2,400," Thembi Nkhwashu, a spokesperson for the Gauteng South African Police Services, told BBC Sport.  "The period when the money could have disappeared is from the time they left the hotel for the match until this morning when we were notified."

Nkwashu refused to be drawn on whether the matter could have been an internal problem, but did say that the players had lacked responsibility in looking after their money.  "All the players had a safe in their rooms and were given information on how to operate those services, but for one reason or other they did not follow the instructions," she added.

The theft will come as a blow to South African organisers, who are staging the eight-team Confederations Cup as a test event ahead of Africa's first World Cup next year. Meanwhile, the Egyptians, who South Africa beat for the right to host the 2010 World Cup, are refusing to blame their hosts, saying such an incident could happen anywhere.  "Our stay in South Africa has been great and everyone has been very hospitable, so this is a very unfortunate event," Mahmoud Taher, the head of Egypt's delegation, told BBC Sport.

"There was some negligence on the players' part, leaving the money in drawers, and they'll be getting firm instructions for next time. It's not an issue which we want to create too many problems over but the Local Organising Committee has been informed." Ahmed Fathi, who played at right-back on Tuesday as the Pharaohs stunned the world champions, said the theft was disappointing.

"Everyone is sad about losing the money, as this is not a good thing, but there's not much we can do about it," the former Sheffield United player explained. Meanwhile, football's world governing body Fifa has refused to comment, saying further details are needed first. Welcome to S-Africa hope you enjoy your stay !

[Maritz]

Pre World Cup Agitrop Lies Are Starting

According to a report released in Europe earlier this week, the following astounding statistical assertions are made :
1. That Britain is a more criminally violent society than South Africa;
2. That even Austria's crime situation is substantially worse than South Africa.

The statistics are derived from European Commission documents, and were also distributed by the United Nations.

Yes, you read right. The European Commission's report states the following laughable lies :
Violent Crime Per 100 000 people
Britain : 2 034
Austria : 1 677
South Africa : 1 609
Sweden : 1 123

Annual Murder Rate
Britain : 921
South Africa : 20 000

Austria and the UK has more violent contact crime than SA ? , Austria of all places ! These figures are so patently false and laughably ridiculous, one is stunned that some imbeciles are actually taking them seriously ! Various "experts" cited by the British media said that the concept of "violence" is interpreted differently in different countries [?!?]. With their slew of insane peecee laws I'm not surprised ... for example, glaring ominously at another driver while sitting at a traffic light constitutes a violent act. Farting in a lift is violent antisocial behaviour. Giving someone the finger is probably Assault with the intent to do Grievous Bodily Harm, not to mention Crimen Injuria and the endless list of thought crimes you can now be charged with.

At the same time, in SA a completely different set of rules apply. Six bullet holes in the back of someone's skull is put down to "suicide" - having your head and hands hacked off with a machete is a bad shaving accident, being disembowelled with a rusted tomahawk axe and having your liver and heart ripped out and eaten while still alive is recorded as "domestic violence" or "death through natural causes" or "poisoning". If you're lucky, being gang-raped by eight rapacious muds might be listed as "sexual harassment" but only if you can name your assailants and are in possession of their ID numbers, residential addresses and their genealogical records for the past 60 years.

OK, perhaps I'm exaggerating a tad now but his is the kind of comparison these idiots are making. Unless its part of some cynical propaganda campaign to butter up prospective FIFA 2010 tourists to the criminal hell hole of Arsezania. As expected, the usual coon criminal-loving denialists wasted no time in plastering these worthless "statistics" all over the SA comments sections, eager to "prove" that the out of control warzone like conditions we so regularly feature is a mere "perception".

With regard to the crime situation in the UK, there is no doubt that crime has sky-rocketed in past few years. Its still nowhere near SA levels, but with a flood of mud races to the British Isles, and massive infestations of muds in major cities, certain neighbourhoods [e.g. Bradford, Brixton] have become de facto no-go areas for White Britons. Some Brits are waking up to the creeping turd world erosion of their way of life and this has seen an astronomical growth in rightist parties like the British National Party.

Most notable has been the growth of the BNP in areas most heavily infested by Paki's, Jamaicans, Nigerians and other turd world vermin. If anything, this little factoid again proves that the luxurious, self-righteous multi-culti position of being a bleeding heart non-racialist quickly dissipates as cold, hard racial truth forces one to revisit one's premises. These ridiculous stats amazingly show UK violent crime to be far worse than that in SA, yet the same report reflects a UK murder rate of 921 per annum, compared to the SA murder rate of 20 000. Said figure of 20 000 has strangely been stuck at the 20K mark since the late 1990's - anyone living in SA has seen an astronomical rise in criminality in the past 14 years, so how this figure remains static at 20K is rather odd. Interpol and various other credible agencies [insurance and vehicle tracking companies etc] have put the figure at anywhere between 30 000 and 35 000 murders per annum in SA. Instead of the supposed 50 murders a day, the Medical Research Council puts the figure at 89 murders per day [and this was back in 2003/4].

[Source : Uhuru-Guru]

[Maritz]

A R4.5 Billion Staduim For A R1

Cape Town is set to sign away the R4.5 billion Green Point super-stadium - for just R1 a year. Despite fears the stadium will become a costly "white elephant" after the 2010 FIFA World Cup, the city is pushing ahead with a controversial deal with a French-South African consortium. The city hopes to receive a 30% share of the after-tax profits from the SAIL Stadefrance Operating Company.

But if the operator does not make a profit, however, the city will recover just R1 a year in rent while spending millions more on maintaining the stadium. To be viable the stadium will have to host between 20 and 40 events a year. The city's 2010 officials are hopeful that the lease will be endorsed by the city council when it meets on October 28. The deal is heavily skewed in favour of SAIL Stadefrance, represented by Springbok rugby great Morné Du Plessis - so much so that one independent legal expert said this week : "The only reason a landlord would concede so much is because they know they have a white elephant on their hands and they don't know what to do with it."

Dave Hugo, Cape Town's 2010 technical director, disagrees. "I honestly believe it is going to be an asset ... we certainly don't see it being a white elephant. To achieve that we have to sweat the asset. He believes that SAIL Stadefrance is a "world best". "The city is not in the business of running international stadiums .... if they can't make it work, no-one can. It won't be a walk in the park", Du Plessis concedes. "On any basis, it is going to be tough."

He believes a "fair deal was hammered out" in the lease despite suggestions the city was "out-manoeuvred and out-negotiated" by the consortium's lawyers. "Fifty percent of the critics say the stadium can't sustain itself; another 50% say our deal is too good." But Ralph Malan, a retired engineer and vehement opponent of the stadium, says the project has been "bedevilled from start to finish with official deception of the public. The stadium is going to haemorrhage money."

Estimates of what it will cost to maintain vary considerably. Early figures suggested it would cost as little as R1.3m a year but others range as high as R30m and even R150m a year. Du Plessis said initial costs would be low as "everything is new and under guarantee". "As they age, stadia do start costing money and we understand that, but there is a limit to the commercial return we can generate."

David Polovin, a lawyer and businessman who led a ratepayers' investigation into the merits of the stadium says that while it "brought with it a lot of infrastructural benefits for Cape Town", he is concerned that the city agreed to share a percentage of the "profits". "It is a fundamental weakness that the lease comes down to a share of the profits. What motive is there for the stadium operators to show a profit ? Profit means tax and it means they have to share with the city. So all they have to do is eliminate profit with expenses. Any shrewd businessman knows how to hide income in expenses."

But Polovin believes Cape Town was in an impossible position and had little choice but to accept the terms of the lease. "There were very few contenders for post-2010 operators. The operator dictated the lease to them." Hugo says there are no guarantees, but the operator's business plans project the stadium will run at a profit "except for the first couple of months".

"We believe the operating costs of the stadium will, at least, break even and not burden the ratepayer. There are no guarantees of course and time will tell." Du Plessis says an anchor tenant which will draw 10 to 12 large matches a year is key to the stadium's success. "We can then build an event strategy around that." SAIL Stadefrance are currently in tentative talks with Cape Town's two big soccer clubs, Ajax Cape Town and Santos. But real negotiations can only take place once the lease is signed and sealed. "All we have at the moment is the potential for an events strategy," Du Plessis says.

"We have got our work cut out for us."

Source : http://www.news24.com/Content/SouthAfrica/986/0ff6c7025fb74a789141372d4568e67d/04-10-2009-04-33/R45bn_stadium_to_let_for_R1yr

More tax payers money down the drain !