Shooting at US HolyHoax Museum (Friend of Creativity Brother James W Von Brunn)

[Rev.WillWilliams]

What's the latest word on Brother von Brunn? Haven't heard anything about him for about three weeks.

Here's a month-old take on JvB as "frustrated artist." That's a good one.  I admire his skill as a visual artist almost as much as I do his uncompromising Creator world view and enduring activism over at least four decades. Somewhere I have a copy of JvB's portrait in oil of BK. I'll try to find it and share it here. It was PM Klassen's favorite portrait of himself. I'm surprised that it's not already on the 'Net somewhere???

http://upstreamzine.wordpress.com/2009/06/11/1465/

June 11, 2009...7:22 am
Was Holocaust Museum Shooter, James von Brunn, a Frustrated Artist?
Jump to Comments

Update: More paintings of James von Brunn have surfaced on the internet.

"It upsets me that I find his painting clever, interesting and well composed." Comment left on Gawker.com.

It goes without saying, but I will say it anyway, the shooting at the Holocaust Museum by White Supremacist, James von Brunn, is a tragedy. It's interesting, however, that many in the media are already referring to von Brunn as a "frustrated artist," without any explanation or evidence to prove the statement. Generally the term frustrated artist is used to denigrate an artist and his or her work. No one can deny that von Brunn is a racist, however, as an art lover I question the use of the term "frustrated artist" in reference to James von Brunn.

I am an admirer of Winston Churchill. Years ago his art was on display at the New York State Museum in Albany, and I went to see it. Churchill was not a great painter, but I was fascinated by his art because I admired the man. He wrote and interesting little book called "Painting as a Pastime."

No one has ever called Winston Churchill a frustrated or failed painter as they have James von Brunn and his hero, Adolf Hitler. If von Brunn and Hitler were admirable people, we would say they painting was an avocation or hobby of theirs as we do with Churchill, but we would not denigrate their artwork.

So far only one example of von Brunn's artwork has been located on the internet. Here it is.

artofjamesvonBrunn

If one lays aside his or her negative feelings about von Brunn, one has to admit that this is a decent work of art. The Madame Pickwick Art Blog said, "The painting is not original but is certainly not mediocre." Even Gawker admits as much, saying:

    As we mentioned, Von Brunn was a painter. Just like Hitler! But the one example of his work that we have (which is no longer for sale at AskArt.com) is, uh, interesting. It is a amalgam of Fragonard's The Reader and Picasso's Woman With a Book. A clever recontexulaization of classics by Renaissance and Modernist masters! By a 89-year-old White Supremacist who just killed a man at the Holocaust Museum!

So why was von Brunn supposedly a frustrated artist? Maybe because he had a hard time getting galleries to show his work. According to an AP story:

    Von Brunn applied to have his art shown at the Troika Gallery in Easton, Md., around the time the gallery opened about 12 years ago, two of the owners, Laura Era and Jennifer Wharton, told The Associated Press. They said they turned him down because it was not up to their quality and that made von Brunn angry.

    "He stomped out," Wharton said. "You don't normally get that reaction from artists."

    They say his work was not strange or violent, but the artists they show have many years of professional experience.

    Era and Wharton said they had heard that von Brunn had been in jail because of his political beliefs and knew that he had prejudices. They did not feel comfortable around him, but said they didn't want to make him an enemy.

One wonders if the owners of the Troika Gallery are telling the truth as to why they turned down von Brunn. I for one wonder if it had more to do with political correctness than the quality of von Brunn's work.

Most of the works being shown now at the Troika Gallery are good, but they are very staid and conservative. None of them are post-modern like James von Brunn's work. Art is somewhat a matter of taste, but it seems to me that von Brunn's painting above is a least as good as most of the paintings now hanging in the Troika Gallery and better than many.

The following example of the work by Laura Era, one of the owners of the Troika Gallery in Easton, Maryland is not particularly good, although some of her other work is better. Certainly, James von Brunn's work above is better.
Wine Cheese and Bread. Copyright Laura Era.

Wine Cheese and Bread. Copyright Laura Era.

James von Brunn did an evil thing when he killed a guard at the Holocaust Museum. No one should try to minimize that. But whatever he is as a human being, it does not detract from his art work.

James von Brunn is an evil person, but he is a good artist.

Postscript: For an interesting take on Nazism and Art, watch The Architecture of Doom by Peter Cohen.

[Rev.WillWilliams]

{In reference to a now removed post:} That's not the one I remember, though similar. What I recall had a whiter (& brighter) background that included mountain landscape, done so at BK's request. It was later made into a poster and offered for sale.

Thanks, though OM. That's a nice idealized image of COTC Founder.


https://creativityalliance.com/forum/gallery/picture/380/

[Rev.WillWilliams]

Several pages into an otherwise dead-end Google Image search for 'james von brunn, art' I just stumbled onto a source name that had a familiar ring: http://adamholland.blogspot.com/2009_06_01_archive.html Clicking on that link I found several informative articles about Mr. von Brunn, including one by NY Times, Co., Inc., owner Arthur Ochs Sulzberger, Jr., even, as well as another by Michael A. Hoffman II, a racially conscious White Xian writer, for "balance," I suppose.

What grabbed me, though, was this little kike gadfly Holland's dragging me into the fray:
---

Ron Paul organizer's website: "88 year old proud White Man opens fire on Washington DC holocaust museum"
I reported some time back about Will Williams (aka "White Will") the neo-Nazi who was an internet organizer, county campaign coordinator and candidate for Republican delegate on behalf of Ron Paul in 2008's Tennessee primary. (Read here.) Here's how his blog is portraying today's terrorist murder of an innocent security guard at Washington's Holocaust Museum:

88 year old proud White Man opens fire on Washington DC holocaust museum
Posted by Adam Holland at 10:34 PM
---

For the record, I haven't been near a plugged-in computer since the first of May until yesterday -- nor have I seen a TV since then. All I've heard about Mr. von Brunn has been what little there was on my radio or what a couple of friends told me back around the time of the incident. This blog that Holland says I have is not mine and I've never posted to it because I don't know how. The blog owner, my old friend McKinley, had added my name to it because he wanted to see me keep on writing, though I had been banned from most prominent While racial forums at the time. I've never had a blog. This is a lame attempt by the Jew to somehow link Ron Paul to James von Brunn through me, sort of like he tried to link
Ron Paul to Hitler, or William Pierce, or whoever, last year during the presidential primaries. Holland was screeching that the sky had fallen when he discovered I'd received nearly 12,000 votes here in Tennessee in the state Republican primary as a candidate to be party delegate. His smear of me was picked up by the Associated Press Jews and they ran with it like scalded dogs.

Here's the link to McKinley's blog: http://kentuckyannatruenews.blogspot.com/2009/06/88-year-old-proud-white-man-opes-fire.html.

Whew! Following a couple of the links at Holland's blog I find this aspiring watchdog has worked up a biography of me with a little help from fellow hate watchdogs: http://adamholland.blogspot.com/2007/10/neo-nazi-support-for-ron-paul.html I hadn't seen any of this before. I notice the COTC is mentioned by the commie ARA (Anti-Racist Action) watchdog, "nikki," in the comments section. She points out that "Klassen says Williams abused his wife."

Perhaps one day we'll get to write our own history, huh?

NEVER AGAIN THROUGH THE SERPENT'S EYE!

[Rev.WillWilliams]

The best source of information I've found so far about Brother von Brunn is here: http://vnnforum.com/showthread.php?t=95777.

Find much of JvB's book archived there. The Jew does NOT want von Brunn's message to see the light of day, as he obviously intended for it to be spread after his publicity stunt at the HollowHoax Museum. It's good reading, with lots of good quotes about the perfidious Yids by famous historical and literary figures through history.

"KILL THE BEST GENTILES!" or
"Tob Shebbe Goyim Harog!"
(THE TALMUD: Sanhedrin 59)

THE RACIALIST GUIDE FOR THE PRESERVATION AND NURTURE OF THE WHITE GENE POOL

by JAMES W. VON BRUNN

Copyright ©2002 Holy Western Empire, LLC.

Library of Congress Catalog Card Number: TXu 916-945, 10 September 1999

[...]

PREFACE

The purpose of this book is to present to WHITE YOUTH
factual information conventionally suppressed or distorted by the
mass media, and denied them by schools and universities — which
are forced to promulgate the Marxist line or lose their government
subsidies. Appearing throughout the text are quotes from world
authorities whose credentials appear in the bibliography. Upon
reading TOB SHEBBE GOYIM HAROG! (KILL THE BEST
GENTILES!) you will understand that — despite loud protests of
denial — an age old CONSPIRACY does exist to destroy Western
Civilization. At this moment we are engaged in a deadly war with
the HISTORIC ENEMY to determine whether or not our Nation
will endure. We are losing that war because an Iron Curtain of
censorship has descended over the landscape abrogating the First
Amendment to the Constitution of the United States. Without
Freedom of Speech our system of government cannot function.
The hour is late. You and your family are in grave danger. We will
present the FACTS then discuss what actions must be taken.

Best wishes,

James W. von Brunn

[Rev.WillWilliams]

The best source of information I've found so far about Brother von Brunn is here: http://vnnforum.com/showthread.php?t=95777...

http://www.nickelrant.com/rants/090610rant.htm

Attorney Ed Steele jumped the gun when he wrote this on June 10th:

"Make no mistake:  I do not defend Von Brunn's rhetoric or actions.  On the contrary, I roundly condemn them both.  Even so, listen up, folks - because there will be more ... lots more ... acts like today before this is over.

"Defending the Politically Incorrect

"I am an attorney best known for defending the politically incorrect in cases where our important constitutional rights are at issue in situations where those people are being railroaded for their beliefs in the context of trumped-up civil and/or criminal charges.  I have defended and provided legal advice to, probably, more of the politically incorrect than has any other attorney in America today.  Always, I have required that they be fundamentally decent people, trapped on the business end of a railroad job ... and innocent - always they must be innocent, regardless of how things might eventually turn out in court.

"And, believe me, I get at least one opportunity each and every week to defend the politically incorrect.  Problem is, usually they are guilty or stupid, or, more likely, both.  I'll tell you this much about Von Brunn, though: stupid he is not.  Reportedly, he is a member of Mensa, the group for bona fide geniuses.  I believe it.

"Would I defend Von Brunn for his actions today?  Absolutely not, unless it was simply to secure him a fair plea deal or at a sentencing hearing.  Never could I defend his conduct at trial.  And, even then, I wouldn't do a single thing for him pro bono.

"Fair disclosure:  if anything, I am biased against James Von Brunn, not for him or his 'cause,'..."

That's a disgusting disclaimer from one who is supposed to be the top defender of WNs in the U.S.  Brother von Brunn's 'cause' is my cause. I'm not sure what Ed Steele's cause is?

I can only hope Ed amended this statement later.

[Rev.Cambeul]

Museum shooter indicted for murder

http://www.news.com.au/adelaidenow/story/0,22606,25856307-5005962,00.html

JAMES Von Brunn, an 89-year-old white supremacist, was indicted today on murder and hate crimes by a grand jury in connection with his shooting attack at the US Holocaust Museum on June 10.

The US Justice Department said the octogenarian, who killed a security guard when he opened fire at the Washington DC museum, would appear before a federal judge tomorrow.

He faces seven charges, including murder, gun law violations and hate crimes violations.

"If convicted, the defendant faces a maximum sentence of life imprisonment. Four of the counts in the indictment also are death penalty eligible," the Justice Department said.

The indictment accuses Mr Von Brunn of "willfully, deliberately, maliciously and with premeditation and malice" committing first degree murder.

It also alleges that he carried out the shooting attack with "prejudice" based "on the actual or perceived race and religion of another" and that he violated gun laws.

Mr Von Brunn, a resident of neighbouring Maryland, entered the Holocaust Museum in downtown Washington DC on June 10 and opened fire, seriously injuring Stephen Tyrone Johns, 39, a security guard who later died of his injuries.

Other security guards at the museum returned fire and seriously wounded Mr Von Brunn, who was taken to hospital in critical condition.

It also alleges that he carried out the shooting attack with "prejudice" based "on the actual or perceived race and religion of another"

And if the shot security guard was just a White man doing his job - no matter how much he disagreed with the existance of any Holohoax Museums - he most likely still would have been shot and killed. Although hate crime charges would have been added to the list, they would have been rather tenuous at the very least. Instead, the security guard that happened to respond was Black, so the Jewish and Black supremacist hate machine is allowed to go into overdrive to make an example of a hated White "supremacist."

More:
Proof that Von Brunn intended to kill anyone at all is yet to be shown.
Proof that he was carrying a weapon for anything other than self defence is yet to be shown.
Proof that he was intent to do anything other than make a political statement is yet to be shown.

What's Ed Steele's take on the charges? Or are Holohoax museums now sacred to so-called "Right-Wingers?"

We White men are on our own. Remember that when you deal with a lawyer.

@Cailen.