Brenton Tarrant: Marxist Anarchist Conspirator - Excuse to Turn Against Whites

[Br.IanVonTurpie]

Yes, behaving like a Tarrant, Brievik is just going to get you locked up for good. Those people made their beds and they are laying in them. If you want to be part of the community you can't break the law. I think Tarrant was suicidal anyway. He went off the rails after his Dad died. He travelled a lot , did what he wanted with his Dad's inheritance money.

What good is suicide when you can serve a cause/ purpose? In his mind  he become "Saint Tarrant"?

The thing is though how do we reverse multiculturalism so  whites can prosper and have a place of their own? I'd like to think politics could do it but ... that is just a dream really.
It'd take thousands of Tarrant's to sort that out. (Whether you think he is either a ZOG agent/ Commie/Anarchist/ Marxist provocateur ).

Something has got to give in the end. You and I know multiculturalism breeds hatred. If you don't want hatred then don't have multiculturalism.

The non whites know race is real and it matters but most whites don't want to believe that now! Some of the whites around here couldn't care less about their origins or preserving their race or even believing they are European, they forget about that and let it go sadly. Just what ZOG wants.

We can't just keep finding a new Oasis to drink from every time the Jew came  to ours and employed:- Beaners, Gooks, Indians to bottle water that goes to swimming pools that:- Africans, Arabs, Gypsies, Islanders and Abos poo and piss in so the water is undrinkable and we try go off to find a new place to call home.

He thought "We got this problem... what can we do about it"? Let's face it though how much :- flyering , rallying and racialist musical shows are going to change any white nation that has been wrongfully imposed with multiculturalism against the people's will in a show of contempt for them?

[Br.Rebel]

My opinion about Tarrant is that he had messiah complex (one group of mental illness). Klassen removed cult of personality because Pointifex Maximus is Curch leader only 10 years between ages 20-30. It means that Creativity do not belive in white messiah as lot of religions. Klassen's opinion about The Order? I hope that you red "On the Brink of..." and you can see that he had negative opinion about them because of criminal activity. Lot of former criminals were within organization.

The problems do not exists when we still have Whites in military and police so we must respect White order as it is.
History told us that White police and military can be aware of all what is hapenning around us and be on right side. We must just show to the our white government that we have peaceful solutions to problems of our society without violence.   

About ZOG conspiracy theories,I rather belive that it is RaHoWa because without Jews,racial tensions would still exists but yes I agree that they manipulate with our brains. Political parties are results of religion. It is total irrelevant whose of conservative parties are in power because they are all part of Christianity.

History told us that is religion most powerful weapon of political order. It is reason why Klassen made religion. I do not want to blame Jews for all and be like african nigger who blame Whites for all.  Whites before Creativity was created had eugenic solution,racial segregation laws but did not have religion. When you do not have dedication of your mission through religion,you can not be successful on long step.

[Rev.Cambeul]

He is example how psychotests within pro-white movement must be mandatory created by White doctors as Germany had in Hitler's time. ... We do not need people as Ben Smith,Tarrant,Breivik etc. Serious pro-white organization would not allow them within.

Ben Smith was gullible and needed to be led. The problem is, he attached himself to Hale - a psychopath that belongs in prison for what he did to Ben Smith. However, if Smith had joined the Creativity Alliance later, he would have been shown how to think for himself. We pride ourselves on the ability of our Church Members to think for themselves and to become leaders and great men in their own right. Hale preferred the whole "OBEY! OBEY! OBEY!" deal for his members.

As for Tarrant and Breivik, they would never have got into our Church. Both are fans of Israel and one of China - that's enough reason for us to dispense with them.

A New Zealand Royal Commission into the attack, publicly released on Tuesday, found he was a supporter of numerous Australian far-right groups including the United Patriots Front, True Blue Crew and the Lads Society.

Those three "groups" are the same group. The people within them move from one to the other to the next in quick succession, using whatever name gains the most for them, all the while pretending to be different groups. The other thing is, they are more or less mainstream groups, run by mainstream parties and Israeli entities in the background. They call themselves "Patriots". The true "Australian Nationalists" do not mix with them. We - Creators, Australia First Party and others that call themselves White Australian Nationalists - believe the "Patriots" to be setup by government agents in order to detract from genuine White Australian Dissidents, like Creators and Australia First. For example, we and Australia First could put out ten thousand flyers each in a single weekend, and there wouldn't be a single peep on the MSM News. However, if United Patriots Front/True Blue Crew/Lads Society farts in public, the entire country learns about it as it becomes the top story for the next week.

Simply put, the "Patriots" are not the real deal. They are a tool of Mainstream Media, Government, Police and a few indulgent personalities that seek to promote themselves at the expense of the people of the formerly White Nation named Australia.

[Br.IanVonTurpie]

https://thenewdaily.com.au/news/2020/12/10/far-right-terrorism-inquiry

Australia must do "a lot better" in tackling far-right extremism, online radicalisation experts warn amid hopes that a parliamentary inquiry will help halt the accelerating threat.

"It's important and probably long overdue," Lydia Khalil, a research fellow and extremism expert at the Lowy Institute, told The New Daily

The probe into right-wing extremism was coincidentally launched just hours after a teenager from Albury with alleged neo-Nazi views was arrested by Australian Federal Police following claims he encouraged a mass casualty terrorist attack


Home Affairs Minister Peter Dutton on Wednesday asked the federal Parliament's powerful Joint Committee on Intelligence and Security to open an inquiry into 'extremist movements and radicalism in Australia'.

The Australian Security Intelligence Organisation said recently right-wing terror accounted for up to 40 per cent of its current workload, and that an attack was possible in Australia.

The inquiry's terms of reference ask politicians to probe both far-right and Islamist terrorism, but Labor's Kristina Keneally – who led the charge for the investigation – said the inquiry would focus largely on the far-right.

"The responsibility we have in the parliament is to explain right-wing extremism to the community and engage the community to help us keep Australians safe," she said.

The inquiry will investigate how extremism has been affected by the COVID pandemic, which experts say has supercharged some radical groups. It will probe whether Australia's framework to list organisations as terror groups – which currently does not include any far-right groups, despite all other 'Five Eyes' intelligence partners doing so – is fit for purpose to deal with this threat.

The inquiry will also look at "the role of social media, encrypted communications platforms and the dark web" in fostering extremism – timely, considering the Royal Commission into the Christchurch terror attack found the Australian shooter had been influenced and radicalised by content on YouTube and Facebook.

Labor MP Dr Anne Aly – a globally recognised expert in counter-terrorism and a professor at Edith Cowan University before entering politics – welcomed that specific focus.

"The difference between right-wing extremism and Islamic extremism, the right-wing extremism has a lot more on the surface web ... They do use social media quite frequently," she said, as opposed to 'dark web' organising

"Social media plays a unique role in spreading right-wing extremism."

Experts 'sounding alarm'

Just hours before the inquiry was announced, the AFP arrested an 18-year-old man who allegedly supported a mass casualty event and spoke of his potential involvement in another.

The arrest came after police said they had monitored his online activity for some time.
AFP Assistant Commissioner Scott Lee claimed the man had "extremist right-wing ideology and is focused on neo-Nazi, white supremacist and anti-Semitic material".

Experts in extremism welcomed the parliamentary inquiry, saying the far-right threat was on the rise in Australia.

"It's a growing threat a lot of researchers and analysts have been sounding the alarm about," The Lowy Institute's Ms Khalil told TND.

"It's clear that, while jihadism remains a significant global force, what we're seeing now in terms of emerging threats is this far-right extremism."

She said it was important to probe how the threat was evolving in the face of the COVID pandemic, which had seen countless baseless racist conspiracy theories rocket around the world.

"But what's not explicitly mentioned in the inquiry, and is really important, is around conspiracy theories and how that intersects with extremism," Ms Khalil said

"I've heard it said that extremism is an elaborate conspiracy in itself. I imagine in a lot of the work researchers are doing in that space, it will come up, but it would have been something to explicitly note and acknowledge."

Dr Andre Oboler, CEO of the Online Hate Prevention Institute, said Australia has "room to improve" on how it deals with right-wing extremists. He welcomed scrutiny on how the internet is radicalising or helping in the planning of attacks, but warned the problem was bigger than simply cracking down on social media content or increasing police funding.

"We need to have this discussion because we could be doing a lot better, but it can't just be all about new powers for government. They can't solve this problem on their own," Dr Oboler told TND.

He welcomed recent powerful moves from Facebook to stamp out hate speech and extremist content online.

However, Dr Oboler warned that radicals were simply moving to other, less-policed platforms that had sprung up as social media giants cracked down on extremists.

Associate professor Debra Smith, a researcher on extremism at Victoria University, said Australia could not afford to become "complacent" about evolving terror threats.

"Our current counter-terror framework was set up in an era of al-Qaeda and ISIS being the major threat," she told TND.

"This is seemingly changing, but while the far-right extremist threat has been here for a while, the rise of this problem to be much more prominent, means it's simply sensible to reassess if our current structures are fit for purpose

Here's an idea if they want to stop Rightwing extreamists. Reintroduce the White Australia policy and expell the non whites. You'll find people will settle down after all that.

[Br.IanVonTurpie]

https://thenewdaily.com.au/life/tech/2020/12/10/dutton-surveillance-bill-australia

The Morrison government's proposed Surveillance Bill could be used to target everyone from Black Lives Matter campaigners to underage kids illegally downloading movies, critics have warned.

Victorians Greens Senator Lidia Thorpe told The New Daily that the sweeping powers proposed by the Bill have "far-reaching implications for grassroots activists, and people standing up for their rights".

"No one's safe under these new laws," Senator Thorpe said.

"It will affect grassroots communities across the country, it will affect children. It will affect anybody who downloads a movie illegally over the internet – they could go to jail for five years."

The proposed legislation gives the Australian Federal Police, the Australian Criminal Intelligence Commission and, through those bodies, the Australian Signals Directorate three new powers to investigate and disrupt criminal activity online

Under the laws, authorities could hack, secretly takeover, and add, copy, and delete material on computers and digital accounts anywhere in the world without the account-holder's knowledge or consent.

Black Lives Matter campaigners, climate and forest activists, and others who use social media to protest and organise could "be subjected to these invasive new laws that allow government agencies to infiltrate people's social media platforms, change the wording, and have complete control over people's personal social media platforms," Senator Thorpe said.

She slammed the Bill as "just another way that [Home Affairs Minister Peter] Dutton is trying to stay relevant by bringing in these these laws that are intrusive into people's lives".

"It's an invasion of privacy, it's a breach of human rights, and it's more reason that we need a bill of rights in this country," Senator Thorpe said.

"This government has a very bad track record on human rights violations ... and then introduce these sweeping laws that are about spying on their own community."

Mr Dutton introduced the Surveillance Legislation Amendment (Identity and Disrupt) Bill  to parliament last Thursday and argued that the new legislation is needed to crack down on child sexual abuse and terrorism offences perpetrated under the cover of the dark web.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XP6CNrzSNhQ

[Br.IanVonTurpie]

From Australia first newsletter 17/12/20


'Far Right' Terror A Myth – Islamic Terror The Reality
Mark F.

Almost 16 years have passed since March 11 2004, when 10 Islamic terrorists carried out coordinated bombing attacks on trains in Madrid during its morning rush hour. These attacks left 191 dead and 1841 wounded. Sixteen months later on July 7 2005, 52 people lost their lives and 750 were wounded as the result of more Islamic inspired terrorism. On November 27 2009 in Moscow 26 people met their demise and 4 months later also in Moscow, on March 29, 2010 another 38 were murdered, once more in the name of Allah. The total number of dead in those four acts of Islamic terrorism is 307. Whilst those maimed totalled 2,789.

Several years later on November 13 2013, Islamic terrorists carried out an attack at the Bataclan Music Hall in Paris, murdering 89 and injuring 332. As well, earlier in May that year, two African Muslim refugees,gruesomely disembowelled (Digger) Lee Rigby in Manchester. Two years later in January 2015, 17 people were liquidated by Muslims in the Charlie Hebdo terrorist attack. Then 11 months later on November 13 2015, another 19 people were slaughtered by Muslim terrorists at the Le Carillion and the Le Petite restaurants and another 15 at the Belle Equip restaurant; this now totals 448.

Then in Nice, on July 14 2016, yet another 86 people are massacred by a Muslim terrorist who callously ran them down in a truck. Then ten months later on May 22, 2017, another Islamic terrorist killed 22 and mutilated 119 at a rock concert in Manchester. Then on August 17 2017 in Barcelona, a Muslim killed 24 and injured another 130 people by mowing them down with a vehicle. Most recently in a three-week period from October 14 until November 3 another 10  people were slain in 5 separate acts of terrorism; 590 murdered plus well over 3,100 maimed.

And whilst these incidents of Islamic-inspired terrorism are the most serious, in that same timeframe, there has been a total of 187 other abhorrent acts of either terrorism or honour-killings carried out by Muslims in the name of Allah - stretching from Russia, Turkey, Europe. However also in that very time-frame across Africa, the Middle East and the Subcontinent since the Madrid attacks, more than 20,000 people have been slaughtered by Muslims. The approximate number of people who have been murdered in those regions, just since Brenton Tarrant carried out his heinous offences, is close to 2000.

Thus, in comparison to the hundreds of acts of Islamic terrorism close to 20,000 people who have been massacred since March 11 2004, there have been seven serious acts of terrorism carried out by non-Muslims with extremist right-wing ideologies.

The most prominent extreme right crimes were:

Anders Breivik, who on July 22 2011, murdered 78 in Norway. Almost 8 years later there was Brenton Tarrant in Christchurch on March 15 2019 who killed 51 and wounded 40 people at two mosques. In between that duo, there was the murder of the British politician, Jo Cox, on June 16 2016. Thomas Alexander Mair, killed her because of her defence and support of open-door immigration.

Yet, in spite of the numbers of terrorist acts which were perpetrated by Muslims in the name of Allah being in the mass (either in Britain/Europe/Turkey and Russia and then in Africa/the ME/the Subcontinent), as opposed to a combatively minute degree of acts of terrorism carried out by non-Muslims: we must ask why is that media outlets and the politicians never pour anywhere near the degree of condemnation upon Muslims? Yet, they do with the White, right-winger variants, who appear in the forms of Breivik and Tarrant?

With that said do not for a millisecond construe that I am, in any manner whatsoever, attempting to defend their actions?! My motivation for raising these decidedly incongruities is to ask why it is that Western media vehemently condemns (as they should do) the likes of Breivik, Tarrant or Mair with inquisitional-like ferocity; but when it comes to condemning Muslims for exacting odious acts of terrorism, they profoundly alter their ploys to concentrate upon holding-hands and saying prayers at a multifaith get-togethers?

Yet, I can state that, had the leaders of those Western nations where these acts of  Muslim terrorism were inflicted stood up and condemned it properly,  then creatures like Tarrant wouldn't have arisen from the bowels of inequity and cut down the defenseless worshipers in the mosques in Christchurch. Quite simply, what made a man like Tarrant enact his crimes – was solely because, in his mind, presidents and prime ministers and media played a softly-softly approach to deal with affairs.

Essentially, Tarrant carried out those attacks because he construed affairs to be the Biblical an eye for an eye scenario. And for those guilt-ridden and, incredibly self-righteous liberal/progressive minded people in Western media and political stratums to pretend that this wasn't Tarrant's intrinsic impetus, demonstrates just how deluded they must be.

No doubt, the latest 18-year-old simpleton from Albury, who was arrested last week and charged with terrorism offences, will be held high by the likes of Christina Keneally to push for an intensive investigation to root out right-wing extremists.  She will now be in her element, holding his head aloft (metaphorically speaking) on her spear of triumph.

Media reports regarding the 18-year-old from Albury, summarily convey to us that he was a right-wing extremist and a neo-Nazi and, of course, a white-supremacist. Indeed, his ideological position is/was extreme! As for him being a neo-Nazi, this would have required him to have read about der-Foorah (sic); and all that went along with Nazism. However, I would almost be certain that his knowledge of that era would be totally insignificant. He probably just liked pretty uniforms. As for anti Semitism, it's an old ideology and it's hard to say what this kid thought.

But as for this 18-year-old being a, white-supremacist (or with any person/party who opposes open-door immigration), is an absurdity in the extreme. While it might be true that, there are a few Caucasian people who think that they are 'superior' to other races, the characteristic reality to take into careful consideration, is to ask why people are opposed to open-door immigration from diverse-ethnocultural-sources. It isn't because they consider themselves 'superior'. It is entirely due to how these immigrants arriving in such volumes over the past 10 to 20 years that they have totally dispossessed Caucasian people in their natural spheres. The kid might be a supremacist but the rest of us are not. We are realists and patriots and that's it!

Apropos to that scenario: Senator Christina Keneally's electoral office is situated smack-dab in the heart of Parramatta's CBD. That entire district become so transformed by mass-non-European immigration such that it now resembles Delhi or Mumbai. Alas, Keneally and her like-minded ilk of open-borders and liberal/progressives are oblivious to or are completely unsympathetic to the people, with long-generational connections to the Parramatta area, becoming reduced to an absolute racial minority in it.

Thus, Keneally would castigate people who oppose the transformation of their suburbs as white-supremacists which is a complete distortion of reality.

35% of Parramatta's residents claim to be Hindu or Sikh. I wonder if Keneally is calling upon them to seek forgiveness for the atrocious manner in which the government of India endorses institutionalised bigotry and oppression against its minorities?

There's a big fraud going on in this whole discussion. Terrorism, far-right, supremacists and all of it. The real problems lie somewhere else and with others.