Racial Loyalty News

R.L. News => General News => Topic started by: Rev.Cambeul on 10 May 2012 at 01:55

Title: UN: Whites to Return Stolen Indigenous Land! Go Home to MULTIRACIAL Europe?
Post by: Private on 10 May 2012 at 01:55
US should return stolen land to Indian tribes, says United Nations

http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2012/may/04/us-stolen-land-indian-tribes-un (http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2012/may/04/us-stolen-land-indian-tribes-un)

Chris McGreal in Washington | http://www.guardian.co.uk (http://www.guardian.co.uk) | Friday 4 May 2012

UN's correspondent on indigenous peoples urges government to act to combat 'racial discrimination' felt by Native Americans

A United Nations investigator probing discrimination against Native Americans has called on the US government to return the land stolen from Indian tribes as a step toward combatting continuing and systemic racial discrimination.

James Anaya, the UN special rapporteur on the rights of indigenous peoples, said no member of the US Congress would meet him as he investigated the part played by the government in the considerable difficulties faced by Indian tribes.

Anaya said that in nearly two weeks of visiting Indian reservations, indigenous communities in Alaska and Hawaii, and Native Americans now living in cities, he encountered people who suffered a history of dispossession of their lands and resources, the breakdown of their societies and "numerous instances of outright brutality, all grounded on racial discrimination".

"It's a racial discrimination that they feel is both systemic and also specific instances of ongoing discrimination that is felt at the individual level," he said.

Anaya said racism extended from the broad relationship between federal or state governments and tribes down to local issues such as education.

"For example, with the treatment of children in schools both by their peers and by teachers as well as the educational system itself; the way native Americans and indigenous peoples are reflected in the school curriculum and teaching," he said.

"And discrimination in the sense of the invisibility of Native Americans in the country overall that often is reflected in the popular media. The idea that is often projected through the mainstream media and among public figures that indigenous peoples are either gone or as a group are insignificant or that they're out to get benefits in terms of handouts, or their communities and cultures are reduced to casinos, which are just flatly wrong."

Close to a million people live on the US's 310 Native American reservations. Some tribes have done well from a boom in casinos on reservations but most have not.

Anaya visited an Oglala Sioux reservation where the per capita income is around $7,000 a year, less than one-sixth of the national average, and life expectancy is about 50 years.

The two Sioux reservations in South Dakota Rosebud and Pine Ridge have some of the country's poorest living conditions, including mass unemployment and the highest suicide rate in the western hemisphere with an epidemic of teenagers killing themselves.

"You can see they're in a somewhat precarious situation in terms of their basic existence and the stability of their communities given that precarious land tenure situation. It's not like they have large fisheries as a resource base to sustain them. In basic economic terms it's a very difficult situation. You have upwards of 70% unemployment on the reservation and all kinds of social ills accompanying that. Very tough conditions," he said.

Anaya said Rosebud is an example where returning land taken by the US government could improve a tribe's fortunes as well as contribute to a "process of reconciliation".

"At Rosebud, that's a situation where indigenous people have seen over time encroachment on to their land and they've lost vast territories and there have been clear instances of broken treaty promises. It's undisputed that the Black Hills was guaranteed them by treaty and that treaty was just outright violated by the United States in the 1900s. That has been recognised by the United States supreme court," he said.

Anaya said he would reserve detailed recommendations on a plan for land restoration until he presents his final report to the UN human rights council in September.

"I'm talking about restoring to indigenous peoples what obviously they're entitled to and they have a legitimate claim to in a way that is not devisive but restorative. That's the idea behind reconciliation," he said.

But any such proposal is likely to meet stiff resistance in Congress similar to that which has previously greeted calls for the US government to pay reparations for slavery to African-American communities.

Anaya said he had received "exemplary cooperation" from the Obama administration but he declined to speculate on why no members of Congress would meet him.

"I typically meet with members of the national legislature on my country visits and I don't know the reason," he said.

Last month, the US justice and interior departments announced a $1 billion settlement over nearly 56 million acres of Indian land held in trust by Washington but exploited by commercial interests for timber, farming, mining and other uses with little benefit to the tribes.

The attorney general, Eric Holder, said the settlement "fairly and honourably resolves historical grievances over the accounting and management of tribal trust funds, trust lands and other non-monetary trust resources that, for far too long, have been a source of conflict between Indian tribes and the United States."

But Anaya said that was only a step in the right direction.

"These are important steps but we're talking about mismanagement by the government of assets that were left to indigenous peoples," he said. "This money for the insults on top of the injury. It's not money for the initial problem itself, which is the taking of vast territories. This is very important and I think the administration should be commended for moving forward to settle these claims but there are these deeper issues that need to be addressed."
Title: Re: UN: Whites to Return Stolen Indigenous Land! Go Home to MULTIRACIAL Europe?
Post by: Private on 14 May 2012 at 10:08
Like I said on the weekend, sending the Whites living in the old colonies back to Europe could be the worst mistake the UN could make.

Send millions of angry Whites to a country they've never lived in before, one crowded by muds, they'd be coming to Creativity in droves. The UN would effectively unite us geographically and force us to unite politically.
Title: Re: UN: Whites to Return Stolen Indigenous Land! Go Home to MULTIRACIAL Europe?
Post by: Private on 17 May 2012 at 05:11
This is bullshit. Is every last mongrel in central asia, turk from asia minor and the myriad mixed mud immigrants of western europe going to * off out of white land? No, it's just get out whitey. Remove yourself from this world.

As far as going back to Europe, all of us from colonial territories are euro mutts. Very few of us are 100% of any one white tribe. I myself have balkan and brittish blood. Many of you are german and english or scottish and italian etc. Where would we go? What part of europe is that? If every last white flooded into europe there would be a major backlash. First of all we are unwanted there. If masses of us immigrated to anywhere other then UK/Ireland there would be an immediate language problem. That and taking other peoples jobs etc we would be seen as just another group of immigrants and enemies of said country, just like you have with say eastern europeans in UK or France who are mistreated. The culture of the host country would be destroyed by our bastardized colonial culture. I want to see white cultures survive not be destroyed. If you flooded Germany with Americans first of all there would be a German revolt and if there wasn't Germany would just become New America and German culture would go extinct. There would be no pure blood Germans left, the same thing would happen to any european nation I'm just using Germany as an example here. Think about the long term consequences. The only place that would even possibly welcome us is Siberia, the middle of fucking nowhere, if we all learn to speak Russian.

I could see an effort to bring expats home to their countries in europe. I think that would be beneficial. As far as an all encompassing white land, for all whites it cannot be in europe and could only be in colonial territory for the reasons I stated above. Of course there's nothing wrong with a few individuals here and there moving to other white nations but en masse would be a problem and the result would be whites vs. whites.

The American Indian is not even 1% of the population here, they are irrelevant. The only thing that can be learned from them is history, don't let others colonize your land. We do not want our fate to mirror theirs.
Title: Re: UN: Whites to Return Stolen Indigenous Land! Go Home to MULTIRACIAL Europe?
Post by: Private on 17 May 2012 at 06:28
Except for those like me who remain citizens of a particular Euro nation or three by descent (and you are correct, we would not be welcome), if we were to be deported to Europe and they sent us all to the same area, we would outnumber the Indigenous European population, and then it would be as already said, we would be angry and united with a common cause. Ejected from the world at large for being White, it would be us that would sweep away European nationalist goals with our pan-European ways, and cleanse Europe of the filth of the Third World. But as you said Brother Mikey, European culture would suffer at our mixed colonial expense.

And Siberia? Even if the Russians allowed that, the Chinks would put a stop to the threat of a new independent White Racial Nation on their doorstep before it happened, otherwise ... next stop, Peking!

Cailen.
Title: Re: UN: Whites to Return Stolen Indigenous Land! Go Home to MULTIRACIAL Europe?
Post by: Private on 17 May 2012 at 06:53
I see your stress on a common place for pan-white-ism and I agree a focal point, one specific place would make it way easier but where? Where would that one place be? That has been a question for a long time. If it was outside of europe we wouldn't have to sacrifice a white nation. As far as european revolt it seems a long dragged out process that is taking forever but civil unrest is happening there and opposition to islam grows everyday. It is sad to say but I think America and possibly Canada are too far gone already. When the dust settles I'm sure we will be left with a white state here but how big will it be? it will definitely not be all of america. It seems the only 2 colonial territories to still have white immigration from europe in significant amounts is Canada and Australia.

I take that back, there is one european nation I absolutely would have no problem sacrificing, Albania. * them. I know you're going to delete that.

From what I hear Siberia is 99% white, excluding a few small ethnic areas. haven't seen it myself, just what I heard.
Title: Re: UN: Whites to Return Stolen Indigenous Land! Go Home to MULTIRACIAL Europe?
Post by: Private on 17 May 2012 at 07:08
Canada's as useless as Alaska. Even if Whites outnumber muds, half the country is frozen for a majority of the year, and they have already divided it along racial grounds. That leaves Australia. Same land mass as the USA, and although it has its racial boundries dividing the nation, they will never be to the same extent as Canada ... and the place isn't a majority frozen land mass for most of the year. Desert can always be reclaimed with technology these days, so that's no longer a problem. At 22 million vs the USA's 350 plus million, there is plenty of room for a massive influx of Whites, plenty of new frontiers to take possession of, and bugger all to deport. It all depends if Australia will ignore UN orders when the time comes. To date, they have a history of ignoring anything UN related they don't like - and that includes orders to hand over land to the Abos at White expense.

LOL No, I wont delete the comment about Albania. Albanian Creators have said the same as you regarding their own nation. None seem to be particularly proud of being Albanian. They know what the JOG has encouraged the muds there to do to other former White nations in the Balkans and are ashamed of it.

Cailen.
Title: Re: UN: Whites to Return Stolen Indigenous Land! Go Home to MULTIRACIAL Europe?
Post by: Private on 19 May 2012 at 07:23
Our Religion states that "This planet is all ours" every last square foot of it. Nature recognises no morality or justice...only survival.

Racial expansion, colonisation, even genocide are all legitimate in the eyes of Nature. The winner takes all.
At the end of the day every race is in conflict with every other race. Only the White Race is unaware of this reality. All the other races know this and they also know our weak point and Achilles heal. Our weak point is our sense of fair play, justice and general decency. It is this that they target.

Ultimately it is nonsense (the article in question). So long as people are well fed and sated the urge to survive will not be triggered. It is just another stick to beat the White Race with.

In fact there are more red niggers now than there ever were...over 4 million bred by the White Man's generous and idiotic welfare programmes. Compare this with the 1 million red niggers that lived in the geographic united states 300 years ago.

As for mongoloids...these originated in Mongolia about 8,000 years ago and on learning  agriculture from the White Race expanded rapidly driving out the original Polynesian type population from the whole of mainland China and Taiwan. They then expanded down into Indo-China and Indonesia driving the aboriginal populations there to extinction..and so it goes on. Racial competition is a fact of life and Nature. The White Race just needs to rise to the challenge.