Creator Forum - Racial Loyalty News Online

Found the idea interesting of suing places that throw the "Hate group" label on everything.

Source:
https://www.cheatsheet.com/gear-style/reasons-people-have-sued-facebook.html

Excerpt: 12 Reasons That People Have Sued Facebook

Another recent lawsuit involving Facebook elicited a very different reaction from civil rights groups than the one that stemmed from ProPublica's investigation. And while it doesn't involve a suit brought directly against Facebook, it does demonstrate the diversity of ideologies in Facebook's user base. Ars Technica reports that the American Freedom Defense Initiative and Jihad Watch sued U.S. Attorney General Loretta Lynch in July. AFDI, which the Southern Poverty Law Center designated as an anti-Muslim hate group, was co-founded by Pamela Geller and Robert Spencer, who also founded Jihad Watch. Both groups have seen their materials regularly removed from Facebook. They argue that their First Amendment rights have been violated, and target Lynch because of her power to "enforce" Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, a civil (rather than criminal) statute that limits libel and other civil suits against websites, service providers, and online publishers. Geller wrote that she was "suing Facebook" because of "the outrageous bias of Facebook's speech policies," which prohibit "hateful, obscene, or threatening" content.

Facebook terms of service are for a private club. Facebook is a private entity that does not need to comply with American Civil Rights.

Facebook is not a Newspaper; it is legally a private club that you CHOOSE to join. You have no rights.

Accusing FB of handing out a false label, ... yeah, try suing the richest body on Earth.

If RACIST means refusing to associate with the inferior mud races, then we are RACIST.

If anti-Semitic means we treat jews like the rest of the inferior mud races, then we are ANTI-SEMITES.

FTW and R!