Creator Forum - Racial Loyalty News Online

Racial Loyalty News => General News => Downunder News => Topic started by: Rev.Cambeul on Sat 23 Sep 2017

Title: Superstitious Tourists Scared of Abo Curse on Ayers Rock
Post by: Rev.Cambeul on Sat 23 Sep 2017
... or Uluru as it's been renamed. The idea behind the curse is that if you take anything from the rock or its surroundings, you'll receive bad luck. Of course it's nothing but bullshït superstition, but anyone gullible to go miles/hours/days out of their way to visit what amounts to be nothing more than a dirty great petrified turd in the middle of the desert with the idea that it's an event that will provide them with life-long cultural enrichment, will believe anything.


IT'S a souvenir from an iconic Aussie spot that's irresistible to tourists. But now hundreds of visitors to Uluru are desperate to send their mementos back.

Leah McLennan (http://twitter.com/LeahMcLennan) | News.com.au (http://www.news.com.au/) (Australia) | 23 September 2017

http://www.news.com.au/travel/australian-holidays/northern-territory/the-souvenir-from-uluru-you-should-never-take/news-story/31345382f651611f088775ae0eb16e5f

One traveller from Hong Kong posted a 300-gram piece of Uluru with the note: "When I received the rock I was so worried that I want to return it as soon as possible. [In] just one week, my brother broke up with his girlfriend, my father went to hospital and he will do heart surgery on the 20 January. Anyway I just want to return the rock to its rightful place and say good bye to the bad luck!"

Tourists caught trying to take rocks or sand from the park can face hefty fines of up to $8500.

(http://www.uluru.com/images/activities/aat_kings_tour.jpg)
(https://i0.wp.com/www.theupsidedownunder.blog/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/0040-Uluru-3.jpg)
Uluru, the great petrified turd in the centre of Australia
Title: Re: Superstitious Tourists Scared of Abo Curse on Ayers Rock
Post by: Br.IanVonTurpie on Sat 23 Sep 2017
http://mobile.abc.net.au/news/2010-06-28/uluru-stripper-just-wanted-to-rock/883870


A French-born exotic dancer who stripped off on top of Uluru has defended her actions, saying she could feel the spiritual value of the sacred site and just wants Australia to "rock".

Alizee Sery, 25, says the show was meant as a tribute to Indigenous culture, but the Central Land Council has called for her to be deported after she released footage of the stunt.

Today Ms Sery told Channel Seven she understood why people are upset, but said she could feel the spiritual value of Uluru.

"When I went there the first time and again I could just feel, it was like seeing an old mate of mine and I was really happy," she said.

"Going up the rock was fantastic and I could feel the good energy of the place and I just needed to express myself."

But Northern Territory Police spokesman David Harris says Ms Sery has committed an offence and could face a $200 fine for stripping in public.

"It's the first anyone down there at Uluru has heard of it and certainly there has been no complaint made to police," he said.

"So until such time as someone does make a complaint and knows perhaps where this woman is, there's really not a lot we can do."

Northern Territory Government Minister Kon Vatskalis hopes the woman is fined.

"How (would) let's say French people feel if an Australian danced semi-naked on the alter of the Notre Dame?" he said.

"I tell you what, Greece would be outraged if this happened in the Parthenon and I think Aboriginal people have every right to be outraged.

"Not only Indigenous Territorians, but every Territorian."

Australian Sex Party president Fiona Patten says many exotic dancers will view the display as a tasteless publicity grab.

"With an industry such as ours which is quite often marginalised - and workers in our industry do have difficulties in so many aspects - this makes it even more difficult, when people like this do something that could only be considered stupid," she said.

"Sadly it probably will bring her a lot of attention, but for the wrong reasons," she added.

"And while I support her right to be an exotic dancer - and I think sex and sexuality can play a role in performance art - certainly doing it on Uluru was really thoughtless."

The controversy has reignited calls for the rock to be closed to tourists.

Aboriginal entertainer Jimmy Little says people who do things like this for publicity cross the line.

He says it is an insult.

"We are a proud race like every race in the world. We have sacred sites and we have deep beliefs that if people cross that line, they're really almost spitting in your face, or slapping you in the face and saying 'I can live my life the way I want to'," he said.
(https://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcSlO7fF-R_qXZ_9s-Ty-I3bex9BPswYZieepyjgkFNbZOV60kk_QxMuJhj9GQ)


The Abos think she has more Arse than class but they are just jealous of her because they are the ugliest,troll like people!Besides all they did was put cave paintings on the joint.They never did anything to craft it like :-Stonehenge or Puma Punku.
They sure want credit for something nature crafted!?

They get $30/tourist when they buy a permit to be in their part of "Australia 2" nobody else can go in. Well I forgot my passport to go into the Boong's Australia today ,ok they'll let me into "their land" if I cough up $30 to them!to see the biggest Rock on Earth."Their rock" they are a citizen of ...not me....even though I have an Australian passport like they do.

Anyway how about we invite some more French chicks to dance there and set up some pole dancing while we are at it?A lap dance might make my $30 worth it?!
Title: Re: Superstitious Tourists Scared of Abo Curse on Ayers Rock
Post by: Br.IanVonTurpie on Thu 09 Nov 2017
Climbing ban just the start

http://www.cairnspost.com.au/news/opinion/banning-climbing-ayers-rockuluru-does-nothing-for-aboriginal-reconciliation/news-story/b7bd9badcc750c471f9045f50fce11ee (https://www.google.com.au/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=2&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=0ahUKEwiVhfa5z7HXAhUFnZQKHRVKCwcQFggtMAE&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.cairnspost.com.au%2Fnews%2Fopinion%2Fbanning-climbing-ayers-rockuluru-does-nothing-for-aboriginal-reconciliation%2Fnews-story%2Fb7bd9badcc750c471f9045f50fce11ee&usg=AOvVaw2f9U8xJSAVHcSNqXvSV0_N)

PLANS to close Ayers Rock to climbers from 2019 add more weight to the notion that the most divisive force in Australia is not white people, but Aboriginal activists.

Already in response, other Aboriginal advocacies are calling for more natural landmarks to be closed to non-Aborigines, such as Mt Warning in northern NSW.

Closing The Rock to climbers will likely set off a domino effect of similar exclusion orders around the country.

Locally, entry to Mossman Gorge is controlled by the Kuku Yalanji people. They say entry needed to be managed to prevent damage by visitors.

The same can't be said for the hardy chunk of sandstone in Central Australia. Instead, it's being closed for "cultural reasons".

In the Daintree, the State Government is looking at increasing the role of Aboriginal culture in managing the area. This includes limiting entry to "sacred sites".

Those proposing closures say indigenous law should trump the law of the land.

For instance, chairman of the Uluru-Kata Tjuta National Park board of management at Ayers Rock, Sammy Wilson, said of the native people: "Anangu have a governing system but the whitefella government has been acting in a way that breaches our laws."

This is absurd and divisive.

If white people proposed a different set of laws for themselves, it would make international headlines and draw worldwide condemnation.

But laws that exclude whites are praised and defended.

Another example from the Daintree is that indigenous people can take dogs into the World Heritage area, light fires and shoot guns.

Good luck doing that if you're not from the right tribal group.

In the Hinchinbrook, a big chunk of Missionary Bay is off-limits to anyone who's not a traditional owner without a permit in order to protect "cultural resources", without actually saying what those are.

Preserving "culture" is continually pushed by activists determined to punish modern non-Aboriginal Australians for the sins of their fathers.

In reality, Aboriginal culture while undoubtedly worthy of pride, respect and learning, has been misused by some to promote self-segregation, with "no whites" computer rooms, sporting teams, jobs and land – all while criticising non-indigenous for failing to embrace "reconciliation".

But it's hard to reconcile when the other party keeps telling you how terrible you are and says you can't go to certain places.

If you don't support partioning off Australia along racial lines decided by Aborigines, you're culturally insensitive, ignorant, bigoted, and racist.

But whenever a defence of European, Caucasian or Christian culture is offered, there are reminders that we must all be eternally ashamed.

Natural features such as mountains, rocks, swimming holes, beaches and rivers belong to no one and should be accessed and enjoyed by all.

As explained recently by someone upset by this: "To ban anybody who is not indigenous from freely accessing this chunk of ancient dried sandstone is a form of racism. If the Human Rights Commission was of any use whatsoever it would be smacking this disgusting, selfish, nasty decision down."

If Aborigines say climbing Ayers Rock – or Uluru as they call it – is disrespectful to their culture, we can acknowledge that.

So no hitting golf balls off The Rock, no partying, no defecating and no leaving of rubbish.

Aboriginal rangers could patrol the area and prosecute those who don't treat the climb respectfully.

Same goes for the Hinchinbrook, Mossman Gorge and the Daintree.

Anyone should be allowed to go for free but not to desecrate.

Mt Olympus, Mt Everest, Mt Kiliminjaro, Mt Fuji, the Rock of Gibraltar – all these natural features are sacred to the indigenous peoples of those lands.

But you can still climb on them, and in fact, it is encouraged – respectfully of course.

So we must ask, if Aboriginal activists truly want "reconciliation" in a united Australia, what would work better: demanding laws that only benefit Aborigines and exclude whites? Or encouraging their people to be more tolerant, more open to change and more inclusive?
Title: Re: Superstitious Tourists Scared of Abo Curse on Ayers Rock
Post by: Rev.Cambeul on Thu 09 Nov 2017
Close The Rock.

(https://pics.me.me/so-i-heard-about-the-stolen-generation-i-dont-know-23930843.png)

In fact, close everything connected to Aboriginal Australians. Close all the natural tourist areas across the country. Force Whites in West Australia outside Perth and in the Northern Territory outside Darwin to get permits allowing them in Abo areas for a stated purpose ONLY.

Let's shut off Western New South Wales, most of South Australia and Queensland. Why not ??? It will only benefit White Australians to understand that if the UN and libtard do-gooders get their way, that's the way things will soon be. Let them get a taste of their handiwork now.

If rosy cheeked libtards want Aboriginal culture to gawk at, they can bugger off to Redfern on New Year's Day and see how they fair.

@Cailen.
Title: Re: Superstitious Tourists Scared of Abo Curse on Ayers Rock
Post by: Rev.Cambeul on Thu 24 Sep 2020
Google Earth Banned from Showing Uluru/Ayres Rock - White People Looking at Pictures of a Rock? Abos Declare "THAT'S RACIST!"

https://www.news.com.au/travel/travel-updates/virtual-uluru-google-forced-to-remove-virtual-climb-after-backlash/news-story/c67385d8dfbec030ad3a0b49a076e317

(https://lh4.googleusercontent.com/-Gx4jhxG-rso/TYBgbrYtKMI/AAAAAAAAAB8/N-w9mgokvmA/s1600/1694.gif)
(https://mapi15rc.azureedge.net/images/2/254/8/pcklst_254_8_1)
"Keep your eyes averted. Don't look at the rock."