Creator Forum - Racial Loyalty News Online

"Out of control" ASIO make false claims of possible "Right-Wing" terrorism in Adelaide in order to keep the funding flowing ...


Spy agency ASIO monitored Adelaide's far-right National Front to prevent racist attacks, declassified cabinet papers reveal

Peter Jean - Political Reporter | The Advertiser (http://www.adelaidenow.com.au/) | 1 January 2018

http://www.adelaidenow.com.au/news/south-australia/spy-agency-asio-monitored-adelaides-farright-national-front-to-prevent-racist-attacks-declassified-cabinet-papers-reveal/news-story/7cfa4f182784635c862f779e01616189 (https://www.google.com.au/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&ved=0ahUKEwj10rv9z7rYAhWBmZQKHQ75B28QqOcBCCkwAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.adelaidenow.com.au%2Fnews%2Fsouth-australia%2Fspy-agency-asio-monitored-adelaides-farright-national-front-to-prevent-racist-attacks-declassified-cabinet-papers-reveal%2Fnews-story%2F7cfa4f182784635c862f779e01616189&usg=AOvVaw15x6g5GmaafVOLRCk1alLO)

Extract: SPY agency ASIO identified Adelaide as the "centre of right wing extremism" in Australia and was monitoring the local chapter of anti-Asian group National Front, declassified federal cabinet papers from 1994 reveal.

Prime Minister Paul Keating's Labor cabinet was briefed on anti-mail bomb measures after the deadly attack on the Adelaide offices of the National Crime Authority and intelligence agencies expressed their concerns about the potential for terrorist attacks by Islamic extremists.

The intelligence briefings are contained in cabinet papers from 1994 and 1995 which have been released by National Archives of Australia.

It includes information on the National Front, which under leader Michael Brander ran a campaign against the "Asianisation of Adelaide" in the 1990s.

The group clashed with police and other protesters at rallies, disrupted a citizenship ceremony and jeered swimmers participating in a gay community sporting carnival.

An ASIO planning document circulated to ministers in November 1994, said the National Front was, "Active in Adelaide, with a high intent and capability to undertake acts of racist violence." Intelligence agencies were also concerned about the potential for anti-Semitic and racist attacks by other far-right groups.

"Areas of large Jewish populations, such as Sydney and Melbourne, remain the most likely areas of concern, although Adelaide is currently the centre of right wing extremism. Similarly Asian businesses have been targeted by racist groups in Perth and Adelaide. The sensitivity of race as an issue means the level of risk posed by the groups will continue to be high, requiring continued investigative action by ASIO, in conjunction with law enforcement agencies"

One intelligence document said a national bomb response strategy was being considered after a parcel bomb killed Detective Sergeant Geoffrey Bowen and seriously injured lawyer Peter Wallis in the Waymouth Street NCA office.

Although the September 11 attacks in the United States were almost seven years away, Islamic extremism was on ASIO's agenda — particularly in the wake of the 1993 car bombing of the World Trade Centre in New York.

Details of some of the terrorist groups with a presence in Australia have been redacted from the documents released on Monday (January 1) due to ongoing security concerns.

"Adding to uncertainties is the wild card of Islamic extremism perpetrated by small, diverse groups previously associated with international terrorism and distant from the Middle East (for example the groups responsible for the New York World Trade Centre bombing), an ASIO briefing stated.

ASIO expected "factional struggles" between moderate and radical elements for control of the major mosques in Australia could be expected to continue.

FEARS TOP SPY AGENCY OUT OF CONTROL

THERE were fears Australia's top secret overseas spy agency was "out of control" and needed to be reigned in following the end of the Cold War, Cabinet papers from 1994-95 reveal.

It was also a time when Islamic terrorism was increasingly coming on to the top spy's radar as a "wildcard threat".

While the security landscape in Australia today has seen the introduction of the biggest reforms to national security and foreign interference, 1995 saw the reverse taking place.

In the final sitting week of last year Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull introduced to Parliament new laws which strengthen treason and sabotage offences and new provisions designed to combat foreign interference in Australia's political system, as fears of Chinese and Russian involvement grow to "unprecedented levels".

But a 1995 cabinet submission from Justice Minister Duncan Kerr saw the offences of treachery and treason replaced with a narrower offence of treason, the repeal of offences of mutiny, assisting prisoners of war to escape and harbouring spies, as well as narrowing of espionage and sabotage laws.

"The existing provisions reflect their imperial and cold war origins and do not adequately recognise the present day realities," Mr Kerr stated.

Australia's security agencies were also becoming wary of the growing "wildcard" of Islamic extremism.

Firstly: Have you noticed that they're only carrying on about Michael Brander's period. That means the ASIO records on Jim's period as leader of the same group have not yet been released. What has ASIO got to hide?

Secondly: I was a member of National Action in the 90's; I still wear an NA pin on my leather Creator vest that only former NA members would recognise. ASIO and the MSM are so useless, they (deliberately?) confuse the name of Australian National Action with the British born National Front. Pictures that show arrests in Glenelg in 95 are of Whites who defended themselves against a combination of violent Marxists and Aboriginal Supremacists with assistance from the police. From my recollection, all charges were dropped because the MSM was there to film and lie, and (inadvertently) recorded the truth, which resulted in all charges against Michael Brander being dropped. There were also more than a hundred witnesses to the attack by anti-Whites, fake media reporting and setup/provocation and illegal detention by police.


Even coppers from that period are willing to admit the truth, although they wrongly think we are less dangerous than National Action ever was. The difference is, we are more careful. We have Hate Crime laws that NA didn't have to contend with, designed to justify the wrongful arrest of anyone White that is willing to tell the truth.

Back then, police knew that when Marxists and non-Whites attacked, White Activists could be dragged off with any amount of false charges. Today it's much the same, but we have our own electronic surveillance, meaning that we have a good chance of beating any false charge. So the coppers of today really have to think which side they are on; the side of politically incorrect but typically law-abiding decency and honesty, or the side of politically correct anarchy, violence and murder?

The truth is that National Action was no more of a terror risk than the modern anti-Islamic Zio-Populists of Reclaim Australia and its half-dozen offshoots. The difference is, the government was desperate to shut down National Action, with multiple false arrests and convictions of its leaders, Jim Saleam (now head of Australia First Party) and Michael Brander, along with car torching, home invasions and more by police paid traitors from the skinhead scene. Reclaimers (and their offshoots) are connected to the Australian Liberal Party; all they have to contend with are the combination of Marxists and non-Whites. The police are there to defend their Liberal Party stooges.

When we joined with Reclaimers, it was never in any official capacity. We agree with what the Reclaimers ostensibly stand for, if not everything they stand for. We see/or saw their events as an opportunity for discussion with the ordinary people that would normally run in terror back to their PC Safe Space rather than speak the truth with our kind of people. And we were largely successful, only ever having run-ins with the Reclaimer heads who saw us as a threat they wanted removed from what they saw as a pro-Multicultural event. By the end of their run, the Reclaimers were using the police to escort our people away from their events. That alone should show that Reclaim itself is a state-sponsored show, set up as a diversion to keep Australia on the Multicultural path of White Genocide.

@Cailen.