Video: Militarized SWAT Forcefully Evict Elderly Woman From Foreclosed Home (http://www.blacklistednews.com/Video%3A_Militarized_SWAT_Forcefully_Evict_Elderly_Woman_From_Foreclosed_Home/27651/0/38/38/Y/M.html) July 26, 2013
Source: Story Leak
Fail to pay your mortgage due to the collapsed economy? SWAT members may show up wearing full military gear in order to forcefully evict you from your home at the direction of international banking cartels.
(http://cdn.storyleak.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/07/swat-elderly-foreclosure-300x145.jpg)
There have been numerous instances of this, but one that was really ignored for the most part happened back in November of last year as reported on by AOL Real Estate in a piece that has virtually zero views. Because apparently militarized SWAT troopers removing an elderly woman from her home because she couldn't keep up with paying the mega banks that are bloated with $83 billion per year in taxpayer funding is now the role of the 'debt force' SWAT team.
And instead of sending in some local officers to escort the 63-year-old woman from her home in Idaho Springs, Colorado, the SWAT team was apparently afraid of some of the elderly woman's supporters who came to protect her home. As it turns out, one of the protesters apparently had a concealed carry at the scene, which sent the SWAT into a furious outrage that led with the troopers pointing assault rifles at 12 protests who were outside of the home.
Because law-abiding citizens with concealed carry licenses are the real threat, despite the fact that we know citizens are preventing over 900,000 crimes that could have turned bloody thanks to handguns in the hands of law-abiding citizens. Surely the SWAT team with full military gear, assault rifles, and bulletproof armor was deathly afraid of the protester who had a concealed carry. According to the AOL report:
"...one of the two dozen protesters there had a concealed handgun. The officers reportedly showed up to the scene pointing assault rifles at the protesters."
And the protesters revealed just how seriously of a threat they determined the 63-year-old woman and 12 protesters trying to save her home to be. The protesters reported:
"About 10 vehicles filled with men in what appeared to be full battle gear (and assault weapons already in hand) began to fill the road in front of the house."
It's truly amazing, but we've actually seen worse.
In the past, SWAT teams have gassed homes to get rid of homeowners who have been foreclosed on, earning them the title of 'debt enforcers' who target homeowners with military-style tactics. And the home they gassed housed toddlers aged 2 and 3, who were then confiscated by the Florida Department of Children and Families. Of course all of this is buried in the AOL Real Estate section that is all about housing finance and market conditions, never to be seen in the top stories or even perhaps a featured article. Articles like these are why I dig through the news and find these hidden gems that are thrown in the back of niche sections and brushed off by mainstream news.
What it comes down to is that if we sit around and ignore other citizens being assaulted by the system, we will be next. __________________
Its only a matter of time before these bullies pick on the wrong people. Muslims, mexicans and blacks stick together and riot when threatened. After many years of study I have come to the conclusion that Whites don't do this because they tend to have other economic options and a way out.
I am generally against violence if there is a risk of another White person being harmed even in law enforcement. But how do these mercenaries do it? how do they live with themselves- that they served money and evicted old ladies and children?
I could imagine one ethnic group doing it to another but not doing it to your own people.
One of theses days someone is going to crack or have the will of the muslim fanatic that says "you have come to mess up my life but I will take all of yours."
If 13,000 Taliban can see off the Us government with its tail between its legs it won't take much for american citizens to crash their wicked system.
Another option would be to burn the building down. Along the lines of "Ok you are coming to take what should be mine by right but you will only get ashes."
a healthy society would make sure that all its citizens were decently housed freely as a right and not cajoled and prodded like a hamster on a tread mill to work away their life making someone else a millionaire.
Quote from: Rev.VanDamme on Sun 04 Aug 2013
Its only a matter of time before these bullies pick on the wrong people. Muslims, mexicans and blacks stick together and riot when threatened. After many years of study I have come to the conclusion that Whites don't do this because they tend to have other economic options and a way out.
No, Whites just react differently to external stimuli to muds. When something goes wrong in a White man or woman's life, he or she thinks and tries not to make the situation worse. Niggers, gooks et al ad nauseam, react with animal instinct. Some argue that it's cultural, but I believe that it's as I said it is: Animal instinct to riot on a tribal scale - and these days the tribe includes anyone anywhere that is of similar appearance. Apart from the White tendency to think before reacting, Whites are still divided due to our names and our individual heritages ... i.e. Divide and conquer via the latent "Nationalism" that remains in almost every White person, except for Creators and guilt laden libtards. As an example of the divide and conquer technique, consider all the war movies put out by Hollywood; when it's Mud vs White, all muds are united against the Whites. Otherwise, it's White against White and the fools that watch the movies accept that division as the natural order of things ... just as they accept pornographic C-rap music videos for their little kids.
The only Whites who react the same as muds, not only live the mud lifestyle, but live in mud neighbourhoods and have surrendered their Whiteness to an assumed cloak of niggerdom.
However, Brits, Germans, French, Russians and the rest of our still homogeneous mother nations do fight back when needed. They don't react like a pack of howling niggers, but they do fight back! While Australians are more likely to fight back than Americans, that's only because Australia's population is of more recent European stock and less diversified than American; but they are not much better than the Americans and given half a chance, will stick their heads in the sand just as quickly as any American and hope for the best.
To put it in simpler terms: Niggers from all over Africa (for example) fight to the death, but when imported into a White nation, let their differences drop away to unite against all other races - with the White man at the top of their hate list. The White man however, allows Hollywood and government agencies to play on his personal bias to reaffirm his European tribal borders, encouraging him to embrace his hate of neighbouring tribes while stamping down on even the mere shadow of discontent against their new black brethren.
Which means life in Niggertown is an eternal zoo at feeding time; and the White man will not even make a peaceful stand against blatant race-based injustice perpetrated against his own kind, because he is so divided - and hence conquered - he no longer has a
kind he is willing to recognise as his own.
Fear of accusations of racism, White Supremacy et al ad nauseam, all stem from that one fact ... and reinforce both the guilt and the desire to avoid confrontation on practically any level.
Think about it.
@Cailen.