Twitter isn't censoring accounts to keep users 'safe', it is using its power to spoon-feed the world establishment narratives
May 9th, 2021
(https://ingaza.files.wordpress.com/2021/05/4-twitter-warnng.jpg)
Which makes it all the more clear this isn't about "facts" or "safety" but blatant censorship
It's one thing to have policies against violence, abuse, and harassment. But in "protecting" users, Twitter is hell-bent on censoring voices that rock the boat, even when all they have tweeted is a peer-reviewed scientific paper.
"What's especially concerning is that I didn't make any personal comment on the paper's content. I only said that regarding that paper, masks CAN lead to massive health damages. It's the conclusion of a scientific piece of work that has been peer-reviewed by at least 2 experts in the field." According to Twitter, Goddek violated their policy on,
"spreading misleading and potentially harmful information related to Covid-19." "Not a month on Twitter & we were locked out of our account, forced to delete our pinned tweet. We must self-censor or be banned says Twitter (paraphrasing) We mustn't contradict official sources. But our letters contradict official sources. (https://thumbor.forbes.com/thumbor/711x474/https://specials-images.forbesimg.com/imageserve/5f99a003bdadc9c0da914236/960x0.jpg)
I'm your guru, can't you tell?
When users try to open a tweet to an Off Guardian article, they are met with a warning that the link could be potentially spammy or unsafe. The warning continues with a large blue button advising to return to the previous page, and a teeny tiny
"continue" on to the article option. Last year, I tried to tweet an article written by respected journalist F. William Engdahl for New Eastern Outlook. Twitter wouldn't allow me to even tweet it, instead
giving me an error message about the link being "potentially harmful." A Twitter account focusing on the propaganda around Xinjiang had his account suspended.
And when the New York Post wrote exposés about Hunter Biden's emails, Twitter locked (https://nypost.com/2020/10/14/facebook-twitter-block-the-post-from-posting/) the Post's account. Which makes it all the more clear this isn't about "facts" or "safety" but blatant censorship. Whether or not you agree with a point or comment being made by one of the people censored by Twitter, we should be allowed to access their perspective, research for ourselves and come to our own conclusions.
We don't need Twitter to hold our hands and spoon-feed us establishment narratives. Twitter's
"rules" page:
"Twitter's purpose is to serve the public conversation. Our rules are to ensure all people can participate in the public conversation freely and safely." Twitter isn't censoring accounts to keep users 'safe', it is using its power to spoon-feed the world establishment narratives | Jew World Order (http://www.jewworldorder.org/twitter-isnt-censoring-accounts-to-keep-users-safe-it-is-using-its-power-to-spoon-feed-the-world-establishment-narratives/)
http://www.jewworldorder.org/twitter-isnt-censoring-accounts-to-keep-users-safe-it-is-using-its-power-to-spoon-feed-the-world-establishment-narratives