Creator Forum - Racial Loyalty News Online

In the early hours of November 4th in Milwaukee, Wisconsin, a batch of 143,379 ballots, all for Joe Biden were dropped.  On Saturday we unearthed an email that shows the culprits behind the 'drop' were laughing about it.

We all now know about the many states that dropped huge numbers of ballots stealing the race for Joe Biden.  On the morning of November 4th, America woke up to see the results of the massive fraud in multiple swing states. In Wisconsin, over 140,000 ballots for Joe Biden alone were dropped in Milwaukee, giving Biden the lead.  We've referred to this fraudulent tactic as the drop and roll. On Saturday we uncovered an email to Claire Woodall-Vogg, the executive director for elections in Milwaukee.In the email the sender, Ryan Chew, from the Election Group shared: "Damn, Claire, you have a flair for drama, delivering just the margin  needed at 3:00 am.  I bet you had those votes counted at midnight, and  just wanted to keep the world waiting." Ms. Claire is the Executive Director of the Election Commission of the city of Milwaukee.


Milwaukee Election Director Claire Woodall-Vogg was also giving daily reports on voting data  to Democrat operative Michael Spitzer-Rubenstein and private liberal  organizations before the election on exactly who was voting. Wisconsin radio host Dan O'Donnell told his audience this about Woodall-Vogg's actions, "In  my estimation, the only reason for this is the creation of a massive,  and I mean massive ballot harvesting operation ahead of 2020  presidential election." The MacIver Institute in Wisconsin gained access to the emails from Spitzer-Rubenstein and Woodall-Vogg. Woodall-Vogg admits to handing over the daily reports to the liberal groups.



Once early voting started, she was providing him with a daily update  on the numbers of absentee ballots returned and still outstanding in  each ward. "Here's what I'll need," Spitzer-Rubenstein wrote to her in late  October, "1) Number of ballot preparation teams, 2) Number of returned  ballots per ward, 3) Number of outstanding ballots per ward." Even with this private data sharing that no other organization  received (or should have received)


Spitzer-Rubenstein still wanted  more. He wanted access to the Milwaukee Election Commission's voter  database... "While I completely understand and appreciate the assistance that is trying to be provided," Woodall-Vogg replied, "I  am definitely not comfortable having a non-staff member involved in the  function of our voter database, much less recording it." That may have been a bridge too far, but Woodall-Vogg still  gave Spitzer-Rubenstein exclusive access to the database in the form of  daily reports...  How is this not criminal conduct? Woodall-Vogg may want to lawyer up.