Tulsa White Lives Matter Protests 1921: Mostly Peaceful?

[Rev.Cambeul]

More Black Americans have been killed by Black Lives Matter "Mostly Peaceful Protesters" in the last year than were killed in Tulsa in 1921. If BLM riots, violence, murders, arson et al are officially designated as "Protests" that are "Mostly Peaceful", then Tulsa in 1921, was, by comparison, Unquestionably Peaceful.

Summary

 * Why? A Nigger raped a White woman in a lift. People could hear her screaming. Her dress was torn.

 * Armed Blacks showed up to support the rapist.

 * Armed Whites showed up to support the raped.

 * Blacks killed Whites.

 * In retaliation, Whites killed Blacks and "BLM'd" Nigger Town.

 * 38 people of all races died.

 * Thousands of Blacks were displaced in the ensuing holocaust of destruction. Many disappeared from Tulsa history, and went off to live happily-ever-after ... elsewhere.

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/factcheck/2020/06/17/fact-check-tulsa-race-massacre-worst-u-s-riot-isnt-ignored-history-books/5341812002

Tulsa 1921: Between 300 and 3,000 were killed, wounded and/or missing

The death toll is difficult to pin down, and the claim is made even harder by combining killed, wounded and missing into one figure.

"Although the exact total can never be determined, credible evidence makes it probable that many people, likely numbering between 100-300, were killed during the massacre," according to the findings of Oklahoma's official Tulsa Race Riot Commission.

Historian John Hope Franklin, in a report that accompanies the official state inquiry, wrote: "One-hundred-sixty-eight Oklahomans died that day. They were Black and white, Native American and Hispanic, young and old."

Dr. Clyde Snow, a forensic anthropologist who served as a consultant to the Oklahoma State Medical Examiner, said in his findings for the official report that a "conservative estimate starts with 38 victims who could be identified individually."

. . . .

The Tulsa riot of 1921 was the worst riot in American history 

"Nope, not even close," says Broussard, who says the Tulsa Race Massacre, while horrific, "generally will take a back seat to the major race riots that occurred in the summer of 1919."

He says the 1917 race riot in East St. Louis, in which 39 Black people and six white people died, was worse, as was the three-day riot in Los Angeles in 1991 that followed the acquittal of four police officers in the beating of Rodney King. More than 60 people died and the rioting caused at least $1 billion in damage.

At Tulsa, Biden Ramps Up Racial Animosity

James Bowman | TheEpochTimes.com (USA) | 4 June 2021

https://www.theepochtimes.com/at-tulsa-biden-ramps-up-racial-animosity_3844564.html

In Tulsa on June 1, President Joe Biden said this: "According to the intelligence community, terrorism from white supremacy is the most lethal threat to the homeland today. Not ISIS, not al-Qaeda: white supremacists. That's not me. That's the intelligence community under both Trump and under my administration."

If I were the media, I would call that a Big Lie.

Not only is it quite obviously false, to the point of absurdity, to say that white supremacists are "the most lethal threat to the homeland today," it's also false that "the intelligence community" has said any such thing.

Biden also claimed that he had said this before, in his address to a joint session of Congress on April 28, but that wasn't true either.

Back in April he had been more careful, citing the supposed white supremacist threat in the context of the withdrawal of U.S. troops from Afghanistan. "The threat has evolved way beyond Afghanistan," he told the congressional lawmakers. "Those of you in the intelligence committees, the foreign relations community, defense communities, you know well. We have to remain vigilant against the threats to the United States wherever they come from. Al-Qaeda and ISIS are in Yemen, Syria, Somalia, other places in Africa, in the Middle East and beyond."

And then he added, as if it were an afterthought, "And we won't ignore what our intelligence agency has determined to be the most lethal terrorist threat to the homeland today: white supremacy's terrorism."

See the difference? "The most lethal threat" vs. "the most lethal terrorist threat."

But the latter isn't true either, at least not judging by the number of terrorist incidents we can positively identify as such.

The problem is that "terrorism," like beauty, is often in the eye of the beholder.

Remember when the Defense Department of the Obama-Biden administration described the massacre at Ft Hood, Texas, in 2009, by the Muslim Army psychiatrist Nidal Hasan in which 13 people were murdered and more than 30 wounded as "workplace violence"?

Hasan had shouted "Allahu Akbar!" before he began shooting and was later found to have been in correspondence with Anwar al-Awlaki, identified by "the intelligence community" as a leader of al-Qaeda in Iraq.

President Obama himself must have agreed with this assessment by the time he had Awlaki assassinated by drone in 2011, but the official identification of the massacre as "workplace violence" remained in effect.

On the other hand, the killings of six Asian women in Atlanta in March by Robert Aaron Long, though they were not officially classified as white supremacist terrorism, and though the shooter himself claimed that his motivations were sexual and religious rather than racial, were spoken of by President Biden at the time as typifying "anti-Asian hate crimes."

Such a characterization of the massacre cannot have been entirely unconnected with calculations of the threat from "white supremacy" by "the intelligence community"—and it was used to persuade the Senate to pass (as it did with only one dissenting vote) the bit of virtue-signaling known as the COVID-19 Hate Crimes Act.

Moreover, we know from the last four years (if we didn't already know it during the George W. Bush administration) of the extent to which the intelligence services have been politicized—which makes it more than probable that they are as eager to find excuses for labeling anything that might conceivably fit the bill as "white supremacist" terrorism as they have long been eager to deny that random killings by Muslims amount to Islamicist terrorism.

In both cases, "the intelligence community" has become a reliable supporter of the Democratic party narrative.

This has become clear once again just this week with the news that they are now having to reconsider their dismissal of the Chinese lab theory of the origins of the coronavirus.

It would take someone more naive than Biden, or even Anthony Fauci, to believe that intelligence reports contradicting a speculation by President Donald Trump as to the manmade origin of the virus were the product of a disinterested concern for the truth.

But no doubt it's their truth, just as it is Biden's truth to see white supremacists everywhere he looks. His ideology requires him to believe that there has been no change in our politics or culture, no progress in race relations since 1921 when the Ku Klux Klan was at the height of its power and the Tulsa massacre took place.

We also know that the President has lent his authority to Democratic calls to investigate the breach of the Capitol by Trump supporters on Jan. 6 as if it were a terrorist incident on the scale of 9/11 and that he has continued to repeat that other big lie, that Trump once called white supremacists in Charlottesville "very fine people."

In short, the President was using the massacre in Tulsa a hundred years ago to reinforce the Democratic narrative, going back at least to Hillary Clinton's "basket of deplorables" in 2016, that the Trump campaign itself was based on and derived its energy from a "white supremacist" movement—later said to have been allied to "police violence" in which all Republicans and supporters of the police were necessarily complicit.

It was that fabricated narrative which the audience was recognizing when it burst into applause in response to the President's false assertion that "white supremacy is the most lethal threat to the homeland today."

The whole occasion of the commemoration of the killings a century ago was designed to inflame racial animosity, because racial animosity works to the advantage of Biden and his fellow Democrats at the polls. If he continues on this course of rabid partisanship, relying only on the appeal of being the anti-Trump, he may find by November of 2022 that it is their only advantage.

James Bowman is a resident scholar at the Ethics and Public Policy Center. The author of "Honor: A History," Bowman is a movie critic for The American Spectator and the media critic for the New Criterion.

[Rev.Cambeul]

When the bloody racial war breaks out, this Black Fella and his family should be given a 1^st Class Ticket to safety - to a Black nation of his own choosing ...

1921 Tulsa Massacre WAS A BIG LIE
From a Black American police officer

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H--xP8Xvnd8

Listen to the end. It's good. You may learn something.

Point of note: Tulsa offered each survivor of 1921 100,000 each & a seed gift of 2 million for the survivor's families. They accepted. THEN a lawyer came back & asked for 1 million for each survivor & a seed gift of 50 MILLION!!! Tulsa said no.